spoken like a truly civil pikey

Because their is valuable points from both sides, you don’t have to agree with them. Tanev is the better d man than Schneider, and the rangers are still cap compliant after the trade. If NYR are unwilling to move Schneider at this point, that is a fair and acceptable argument, but both sides have merit.

. . . and this would explain why you have the just-arrested child molester Andrew Tate.

You have issues. Now it is my fault Great is Swedish. I did check this trade it is awful for NYR but your thick head don't get it. I can't win over stupidity.

What? Based on what? Where is he a better defence men? Show me all the metrics supporting your claim

lol as if? how is that connection exactly?

LOL @ Schneider being better who can't produce at more than 15mins vs Norris finalist

When was Tanev norris finalist?

Either way Schneider is better point producer and had his whole career in front of him. Do you want to actually argue the point or go off trying to attack me on none hockey related matters?

Both Schneiders Corsi %/60 and Fenwick %/60 is well below Tanevs. In truth I think they’re a similar player.
For me Tanev beats Schneider by the he test, because he rarely makes a mistake. He makes a younger mobile d-man much more valuable at this point in his career. Will Braden be better over his career? Maybe?

Top 15 finalist is still a finalist.

Tanev is the player you hope Schneider can become and would help NYR with their poor right side this year and next far more than Schneider

Schneider has more points, and has the whole career a head of him. So that is not a maybe.

Not that this matters because this isn't happening. By the way your friend accusing me of not knowing math or is related to Greta is not hockey arguments. He doesn't answer my counter arguments and just trying to attack. So I am trying to explain but he refuse to listen.
And this you based that it must be "close" on...

Alright buddy you do you. This is clearly not happening but if you get enjoyment of this then so be it.

Fair enough, don’t know the guy, not my friend. I don’t appreciate any attacks on here. I enjoy constructive debates. I’m sorry that you got painted that way.

go ahead, what's the relation?

et tu brutus?

the swedish clownfish started his aggression, typical i know... and then whines about not having me accept his argument that Schneider is better because he has a few more points as a depth defensemen vs the other arguments presented as in TOI/CF/Fenwick/Norris consideration. The trade is literally cap compliant and he complains about that too. Sounds a lot like it must be something in the water.

I know the trade is cap compliant as I said, and I believe that Tanev is a better d man than Schneider.
“And me as well”? I don’t believe I ever attacked anyone.

Like I said I appreciate the debates. Cheers

the attacks were from @AG_sweden as I described the post above

et tu because you distanced yourself after the olive branch was accepted and we both seemed to enjoy the banter

ze brutish fish is the one who yells nonsense and claims no one plays nice, he said the cap didnt work, it does, and then that the obviously much worse dman is better, which we both shared stats and arguments vs his "bUt MoRe PoInTs"

Just read the first insults. It was not from me. And a lot on attacks because I Swedish. I never mixed in nationality.

Just going to ignore whatever you write from now on.

Want us to add shesty and fox too? I mean you can’t rawdog us any harder than this.

No thankyou, we can’t afford them, lol

Both teams pass