SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston trade

Créé par: davejud8
Équipe: 2017-18 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2017
Publié: 3 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This trade makes absolutely 0 sense for the Caps but I did it because I'm bored and I want it to be October already. As far as value I think this is fair. Bruins give up a few of their best D prospects and dump McQuaids contract while getting back a legit top pair rhd and lhd. Carlson signs extension with the Bruins after getting rid of McQuaids contract and Chara's coming off the books after this year. Their left defense is now set for years to come after Orlov extension (Orlov and Krug) and it also allows McAvoy to flourish in a second pair role without too much pressure on him on the right side. Sweeny said today that he's willing to make some big moves to improve the left side immediately so I tried to do that. EDIT: changed Carlo to McAvoy
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
76 000 000 $
64 125 000 $
2800 000 $
63 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 900 000 $
2800 000 $
22 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
43 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2017 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Orpik, Brooks
Détails additionnels:
rights to Grubauer
2.
3.
BOS
  1. Carlson, John
Détails additionnels:
Carlson signs extension
rights to Orlov
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de ARI
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2018
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2019
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2274 000 000 $71 704 273 $4 978 $1 395 000 $2 295 727 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 8
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
692 500 $692 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 4
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2017 à 13 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
You're better off keeping both Carlson and or lovo think
3 juin 2017 à 13 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Vegas can take Grubauer in the draft no need for them to take Orpik to.
3 juin 2017 à 13 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: oilnate
Vegas can take Grubauer in the draft no need for them to take Orpik to.


My bad sorry didn't read that right
3 juin 2017 à 13 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Dylan1995
You're better off keeping both Carlson and or lovo think


Oh absolutely, this move makes no sense but I'm just messing around
3 juin 2017 à 13 h 54
#5
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
I don't see why Washington gives up a top pairing quality defenseman and a solid top 4 defenseman for this. As a Bruins fan, I would take in a heartbeat.
3 juin 2017 à 14 h 14
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: BreKel
I don't see why Washington gives up a top pairing quality defenseman and a solid top 4 defenseman for this. As a Bruins fan, I would take in a heartbeat.


Changed Carlo to McAvoy, I'm sure your opinion has changed completely now lol
3 juin 2017 à 14 h 18
#7
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: davejud8
Quoting: BreKel
I don't see why Washington gives up a top pairing quality defenseman and a solid top 4 defenseman for this. As a Bruins fan, I would take in a heartbeat.


Changed Carlo to McAvoy, I'm sure your opinion has changed completely now lol


Boston says no in a heartbeat. Please change it back. Seeing fans throw McAvoy into deals gives me heartburn. That kid is a stud and going nowhere.
Pasta88Sauce a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2017 à 14 h 33
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: davejud8


Changed Carlo to McAvoy, I'm sure your opinion has changed completely now lol


Boston says no in a heartbeat. Please change it back. Seeing fans throw McAvoy into deals gives me heartburn. That kid is a stud and going nowhere.


To be fair your top 4 immediately becomes one of if not the best in the league for at least 4 years after this deal
3 juin 2017 à 14 h 45
#9
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: davejud8
Quoting: BreKel


Boston says no in a heartbeat. Please change it back. Seeing fans throw McAvoy into deals gives me heartburn. That kid is a stud and going nowhere.


To be fair your top 4 immediately becomes one of if not the best in the league for at least 4 years after this deal


or they keep McAvoy and build with him instead. I'd prefer that route.
3 juin 2017 à 15 h 5
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: BreKel
Quoting: davejud8


To be fair your top 4 immediately becomes one of if not the best in the league for at least 4 years after this deal


or they keep McAvoy and build with him instead. I'd prefer that route.


Fair enough, depends on your preference. All I'm saying is that you get two top pairing dmen who are arguably in their prime at the cost of a young kid who looks to be well on his way to becoming that, another d prospect who could turn out great but has 0 nhl games under his belt AND you get to dump a contract. To not at least consider it would be a disservice to your aging forward core.
3 juin 2017 à 15 h 17
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: davejud8
Quoting: BreKel


or they keep McAvoy and build with him instead. I'd prefer that route.


Fair enough, depends on your preference. All I'm saying is that you get two top pairing dmen who are arguably in their prime at the cost of a young kid who looks to be well on his way to becoming that, another d prospect who could turn out great but has 0 nhl games under his belt AND you get to dump a contract. To not at least consider it would be a disservice to your aging forward core.


Wait if McAvoy has 0 NHL games under his belt, who the **** was pretending to be him in the playoffs?

The reality is Sweeney & Co. love McAvoy and Carlo. I don't see either of them being traded unless its for franchise altering player. In today's NHL you need young cost controlled players. Chicago for years would lose a guy and then have someone else step in, when they wanted more then CHI could offer they traded them. Unfortunately they also started burning picks on rentals to make runs and now look at where they are.

Carlo + McAvoy + Bergeron + Marchand + Pastrnak are as close to untouchable as you can get
3 juin 2017 à 15 h 19
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: ON3M4N
Quoting: davejud8


Fair enough, depends on your preference. All I'm saying is that you get two top pairing dmen who are arguably in their prime at the cost of a young kid who looks to be well on his way to becoming that, another d prospect who could turn out great but has 0 nhl games under his belt AND you get to dump a contract. To not at least consider it would be a disservice to your aging forward core.


Wait if McAvoy has 0 NHL games under his belt, who the **** was pretending to be him in the playoffs?

The reality is Sweeney & Co. love McAvoy and Carlo. I don't see either of them being traded unless its for franchise altering player. In today's NHL you need young cost controlled players. Chicago for years would lose a guy and then have someone else step in, when they wanted more then CHI could offer they traded them. Unfortunately they also started burning picks on rentals to make runs and now look at where they are.

Carlo + McAvoy + Bergeron + Marchand + Pastrnak are as close to untouchable as you can get


Zboril is the one I was referring to who has 0 nhl games.
3 juin 2017 à 16 h 59
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: davejud8
Quoting: ON3M4N


Wait if McAvoy has 0 NHL games under his belt, who the **** was pretending to be him in the playoffs?

The reality is Sweeney & Co. love McAvoy and Carlo. I don't see either of them being traded unless its for franchise altering player. In today's NHL you need young cost controlled players. Chicago for years would lose a guy and then have someone else step in, when they wanted more then CHI could offer they traded them. Unfortunately they also started burning picks on rentals to make runs and now look at where they are.

Carlo + McAvoy + Bergeron + Marchand + Pastrnak are as close to untouchable as you can get


Zboril is the one I was referring to who has 0 nhl games.


Still rather take the gamble on Zboril if it means I keep McAvoy
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage