God I want Fantilli! he could be better than our last 2nd OA pick! I want him more than Bedard, they are both elite but Fantilli has 6” and 30+ LBS while not giving up much speed.

I am not a Sharks fan per say, but I think that when it's all said and done, Fantilli will have had a better career than Bedard (with all respects to Bedard). To me, he's the best in the class. Love his 6'2 size (he'll probably be at least 200 by the time his rookie season starts) and he's already playing against stiff competition. They will both be generational talents, but if it were my team, I'd want Fantilli.

On a side note: that Leo Carlsson looks OUTSTANDING! He'd be my number 3.

Of course, these are just my opinions (please no hate!)

100% agree. Fantilli and Carlsson definitely should be the priorities if the Sharks get a Top 4 pick. They need size if they're going to be going up against Beniers, Byfield and McTavish for the next ten years in the division. Fantilli would be the perfect Toews to Eklund's Kane.

Cant hate a person for giving their opinion. People on here comparing Bedard to Mcdavid and Fantilli to Eichle are not paying attention to the facts.
both those guys were within 1" and 10 pounds of each-other and so you could base your preference purely on skill.
Bedard is great but 5'9" and 155 pounds while Fantili is almost as good offensively and almost as fast but is 6'3" 195 pounds. and in a sport as physical and violent as hockey 6" and 40 pounds is HUGE. Bedard will be a very good hockey player (I see him being a slightly better version of Gaudreau) but Fantilli will be a powerful physical force while also being very good offensively (like a better bigger Pastrnak) and if a team like the sharks had the option to draft either one they would only have to look at their top 4 offensive prospects (Bordeleau 5'10" 165, Eklund 5'11" 178, Robins 5'8 160, Gushin 5'10" 178) and see a powerful larger C to offset their smaller prospects would be wise.

Couldn't agree more.