So you think Vegas doesn't take Silfverberg? There's no way that they pass up on him or one of their defensemen

Trade one defensemen and waive Bieksa's NMC and you can protect the 3 other eligible defensemen. Silfverberg would then be covered in the 7 forwards.

What do you guys not understand about the Expansion Draft.

7 Forwards
3 Defenseman
Bieksa waives NMC

With Vatanen being injured now, which may be longer than Lindholm, does that drop the value of him trade wise? Obviously I am a Rangers fan. Does that change it from Miller to Hayes possibly?

I wonder the same thing. I think it just depends on what the other team wants. The Ducks now have a disadvantage over other teams like the Wild or nashville trading defenseman that healthy vs hurt.

I would say not that drastically. He was able to play through the injury and if he misses the full 5 months... that would be about the 10 game-ish mark of next year? So from 246 games under contract to 236. That's probably not the difference between Miller to Hayes. Without being in the Dr.'s office though I'm just wildly speculating.

And thanks for the rating on a admittedly boring and unimaginative roster!