SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NHL 23 player ratings

Créé par: All_Knowing
Équipe: 2022-23 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 26 août 2022
Publié: 26 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NHL 23 player ratings predictions (taking into account that NHL ratings tend to be lower than they should):

Ovi - 93
Kuzy - 88
Brown - 84

Sheary - 82
Strome - 84
Mantha - 84

McMichael - 79
Eller - 80
Oshie - 83

MoJo - 79
Dowd - 80
Hathaway - 81

Fehervary - 83
Carlson - 87

Orlov - 85
Jensen - 83

Gustafsson - 79
TVR - 80

Kuemper - 86
Lindgren - 80

LITR / Potential call-ups (in no particular order):
Wilson - 86
Backy - 83
Hags - 78
Johansen - 76 (Bottom d-pair potential)
Lapierre - 76 (High top 6 potential)
Leasson - 74 (Bottom 6)
Protas - 76 (Bottom 6)
Snively - 77 (Bottom 6)
Alexeyev - 77 (Bottom d-pair 6)
Borgstrom - 77 (middle 6)
Fucale - 76 (Backup)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $65 211 667 $100 000 $0 $17 288 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 août 2022 à 13 h 53
#1
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,322
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Robbery on potential for Leason, Protas, and Alexeyev
26 août 2022 à 14 h 5
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
Robbery on potential for Leason, Protas, and Alexeyev


Robbery in which way?

For me, I had a tough time on those. As a Caps fan, I think our prospects are great (bias I know). I was trying to come at it from the EA NHL angle that always undervalues players (with lower potential and low ratings), especially smaller name prospects like these three you mentioned.

As far as my personal potential for those three: Protas - middle 6 forward (3rd line) ; Alexeyev - top 4 potential (more 2nd line defender) ; Leasson - bottom 6 forward (sticking with it).
26 août 2022 à 14 h 40
#3
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,322
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: All_Knowing
Robbery in which way?

For me, I had a tough time on those. As a Caps fan, I think our prospects are great (bias I know). I was trying to come at it from the EA NHL angle that always undervalues players (with lower potential and low ratings), especially smaller name prospects like these three you mentioned.

As far as my personal potential for those three: Protas - middle 6 forward (3rd line) ; Alexeyev - top 4 potential (more 2nd line defender) ; Leasson - bottom 6 forward (sticking with it).


Quoting: All_Knowing
Robbery in which way?

For me, I had a tough time on those. As a Caps fan, I think our prospects are great (bias I know). I was trying to come at it from the EA NHL angle that always undervalues players (with lower potential and low ratings), especially smaller name prospects like these three you mentioned.

As far as my personal potential for those three: Protas - middle 6 forward (3rd line) ; Alexeyev - top 4 potential (more 2nd line defender) ; Leasson - bottom 6 forward (sticking with it).


I personally think they are too low. I would have done:

Protas at Low Top 6
Alexeyev Medium Top 4
Leason at medium top 9

Eidt: apologies on the double quote
All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 52
#4
Sway4Vezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 361
EA really seems to like John Carlson for some reason. 88 or 87 is good
All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 15 h 0
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: cMac73
EA really seems to like John Carlson for some reason. 88 or 87 is good


Agreed. 87-88 is a very fair rating for him.
26 août 2022 à 15 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
I personally think they are too low. I would have done:

Protas at Low Top 6
Alexeyev Medium Top 4
Leason at medium top 9

Eidt: apologies on the double quote


Gotcha. Yeah makes sense - We agree with Alexeyev. Protas for me will be a mid guy (right now only due to his somewhat poor skating ability). Leasson for me is a solid bottom 6 guy but would love be proven wrong!
26 août 2022 à 21 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,349
Mentions "j'aime": 1,911
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
I personally think they are too low. I would have done:

Protas at Low Top 6
Alexeyev Medium Top 4
Leason at medium top 9

Eidt: apologies on the double quote


Protas I think has shown he is at worst a bottom 6 NHL player so I definitely agree w the low top 6 there. Alexeyev and Leason however both have enough pro seasons under their belt that in all likelihood this is what they will be.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage