SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Targeting Would-Be Exposed Players

Créé par: mewatki2
Équipe: 2017-18 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 22 mai 2017
Publié: 22 mai 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
And Matt Duchene. The logic here is that these players would be exposed so it would be smart to get them below their normal value.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Duchene, Matt
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (LAK)
COL
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. McKeown, Roland
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (CAR)
2.
ANA
  1. Kuokkanen, Janne
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (CAR)
3.
MIN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2017 (CAR)
4.
CAR
    Expansion Draft
    VGK
    1. Läck, Eddie
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (NJD)
    5.
    CAR
    1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2017
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    2018
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de TOR
    2019
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2373 000 000 $58 481 666 $0 $2 740 000 $14 518 334 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    5 725 000 $5 725 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    683 333 $683 333 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 mai 2017 à 16 h 59
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Duchene isn't being exposed.

    Why would Vegas take Lack over Subban or Raanta?
    22 mai 2017 à 17 h 16
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Michael
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: dirtface
    Duchene isn't being exposed.

    Why would Vegas take Lack over Subban or Raanta?


    Sorry I didn't make it clearer. Duchene trade isn't because he would be exposed, Canes should be targeting him anyway for the right price. I think Sakic will be forced to lower his prices and I can see this deal going down on draft day.

    The 3rd round pick is an incentive to take Lack over those goalies (they may even take both with Lack). McPhee has stated that he will be looking to add picks for unwanted players. Lack didn't fit well with the Canes but I think he still has potential to be a solid back up with the right goalie coach. Throw in a 3rd and Vegas may bite.
    22 mai 2017 à 17 h 45
    #3
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 33,053
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
    Pretty sure that Anaheim plans on protecting Silfverberg, Don't see them dealing him.
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 2
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    I don't see Lack as a guy Vegas would have any interest in and I say this as a Canucks fan who loves him. I can understand an argument of them being convinced to take Ward as a kinda 1 and 1a mentorship of a young goalie but not Eddie. He's not experienced enough.
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 2
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Michael
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: Larkinisking
    Pretty sure that Anaheim plans on protecting Silfverberg, Don't see them dealing him.


    Obviously they'd love to, but I figured they'd be going 4 forwards (Getz, Perry, Kesler on NMC, plus Rakell) and 4 defense men (Bieksa on NMC, Vatanen, Lindholm and Theodore/Manson). Who do you think they'll protect?
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 7
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Michael
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: dirtface
    I don't see Lack as a guy Vegas would have any interest in and I say this as a Canucks fan who loves him. I can understand an argument of them being convinced to take Ward as a kinda 1 and 1a mentorship of a young goalie but not Eddie. He's not experienced enough.


    Yeah, it may take more to sweeten the pot. I just think Lack has a higher ceiling at this point in his career. I don't see Ward staying in Vegas more than his 1 contract year with his son having all of his medical specialists in Raleigh.

    At the end of the day, this is still my best case scenario and I really see Vegas taking whoever we don't protect out of Stempniak, McGinn, and Di Giuseppe.
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 11
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 263
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Modifié 22 mai 2017 à 18 h 17
    Quoting: mewatki2


    Obviously they'd love to, but I figured they'd be going 4 forwards (Getz, Perry, Kesler on NMC, plus Rakell) and 4 defense men (Bieksa on NMC, Vatanen, Lindholm and Theodore/Manson). Who do you think they'll protect?


    Ducks will buyout Bieksa before expansion draft to avoid protecting him

    Ward wouldn't be in Vegas because of his ceiling he'd be there to help teach Subban or Raanta how to be a starting goalie in the nhl. If you want young players to improve they need mentors. Though I fully expect Vegas to sign Ryan Miller to do that. His family lives in LA so it would be close for him and they won't have to waste a pick in expansion draft to get him
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 12
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,788
    Mentions "j'aime": 208
    Anaheim will probably protect Perry, Rakell, Getzlaf, Kesler, Colgliano, Silfverberg, then trade Vatanen or Fowler for another forward and protect that forward. Bieksa will waive his no movement clause or they will buy him out and then protect Lindholm, Manson, Fowler/Vatanen whichever is't traded. Theodore is exempt from the expansion draft.
    22 mai 2017 à 18 h 58
    #9
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,645
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,732
    A third round pick isn't enough to get rid of Lack. Vegas will have a choice of lots of good goalies and Lack isn't one. Of course you have followed the script of so many that Vegas doesn't care about the quality of their players or the their cap.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage