SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just Spitballing

Créé par: DocArin0
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 22 juill. 2022
Publié: 22 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 350 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Askarov, Yaroslav
  2. Tomasino, Philip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew [Droits de RFA]
2.
CGY
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
FLA
    Future Considerations
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    2024
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de CGY
    2025
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2082 500 000 $68 714 166 $0 $1 262 500 $13 785 834 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    RFA - 2
    8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Panthers de la Floride
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    G
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 juill. 2022 à 15 h 51
    #1
    Dekesaladekes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
    I think they would prefer like svechkov over askarov also the value still just isnt there.

    Maybe something like
    Granlund+Svechkov+ Tomasino +23 1st + 24 2nd would work
    22 juill. 2022 à 15 h 58
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 735
    Mentions "j'aime": 143
    Quoting: Dekes
    I think they would prefer like svechkov over askarov also the value still just isnt there.

    Maybe something like
    Granlund+Svechkov+ Tomasino +23 1st + 24 2nd would work

    I thought so too, but hard to balance fair value & other GMs knowing if CGYs bind reducing the overall return. I realistically feel they only get 3 pieces back
    Dekes a aimé ceci.
    22 juill. 2022 à 17 h 36
    #3
    Lets go Preds
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 915
    Quoting: DocArin0
    I thought so too, but hard to balance fair value & other GMs knowing if CGYs bind reducing the overall return. I realistically feel they only get 3 pieces back


    I think this too. Calgary doesn’t have a leg to stand on. You’re obviously gonna take the best package for him but I think other gms will low ball them. Like you don’t wanna take this fine we’ll just wait a year. Calgary is not in a good spot right now.

    As far as the trade Nashville would have to move salary to make a trade for tkachuk work. Sad part I don’t look at anyone of our top paid players as negative value to dump.
    22 juill. 2022 à 18 h 27
    #4
    Dekesaladekes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
    Quoting: GeauxPreds1
    I think this too. Calgary doesn’t have a leg to stand on. You’re obviously gonna take the best package for him but I think other gms will low ball them. Like you don’t wanna take this fine we’ll just wait a year. Calgary is not in a good spot right now.

    As far as the trade Nashville would have to move salary to make a trade for tkachuk work. Sad part I don’t look at anyone of our top paid players as negative value to dump.


    though tkachuk wants gone calgary still has RFA rights for the next 2 seasons i think, plus with arbitration they will settle a contract so either way calgary doesn't have to say yes to a trade as they can still wait a whole year till next offseason before needing to make a decision
    22 juill. 2022 à 20 h 8
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 735
    Mentions "j'aime": 143
    Quoting: GeauxPreds1
    I think this too. Calgary doesn’t have a leg to stand on. You’re obviously gonna take the best package for him but I think other gms will low ball them. Like you don’t wanna take this fine we’ll just wait a year. Calgary is not in a good spot right now.

    As far as the trade Nashville would have to move salary to make a trade for tkachuk work. Sad part I don’t look at anyone of our top paid players as negative value to dump.


    I can definitely see Granlund in any package for RFA rights. Say throw in Granlund & CGY throws on their 3rd?
    22 juill. 2022 à 21 h 52
    #6
    Lets go Preds
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 915
    Quoting: Dekes
    though tkachuk wants gone calgary still has RFA rights for the next 2 seasons i think, plus with arbitration they will settle a contract so either way calgary doesn't have to say yes to a trade as they can still wait a whole year till next offseason before needing to make a decision

    If he signs a 1 year deal in Calgary he’ll be a ufa next summer meaning Calgary will lose him for nothing if they don’t trade him this year. I don’t know how true it is but supposedly he gave the teams hell sign a long term contract with making It harder for Calgary to maximize his trade value. If true no other team is probably gonna want to give much for a player that is only gonna play 1 year for. So that leaves Dallas, Vegas, Florida, Nashville and St. Louis(who I think he’ll eventually go to). Pretty much tkachuk gave is own modified no trade clause. These 5 teams are gonna have to clear cap to afford tkachuk so Calgary will have to a contract back. Calgary is looking for a top 6 player, a top prospect and a 1st is rumors are true so I see Nashville offering Johansen, Evangelista and a 1st. They might throw in another prospect but not another one of there top prospect like askarov. If they are rebuilding then they can retain a million or even 2 and get some great value back for Johansen.
    24 juill. 2022 à 18 h 33
    #7
    Dekesaladekes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 2,920
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
    Quoting: GeauxPreds1
    If he signs a 1 year deal in Calgary he’ll be a ufa next summer meaning Calgary will lose him for nothing if they don’t trade him this year. I don’t know how true it is but supposedly he gave the teams hell sign a long term contract with making It harder for Calgary to maximize his trade value. If true no other team is probably gonna want to give much for a player that is only gonna play 1 year for. So that leaves Dallas, Vegas, Florida, Nashville and St. Louis(who I think he’ll eventually go to). Pretty much tkachuk gave is own modified no trade clause. These 5 teams are gonna have to clear cap to afford tkachuk so Calgary will have to a contract back. Calgary is looking for a top 6 player, a top prospect and a 1st is rumors are true so I see Nashville offering Johansen, Evangelista and a 1st. They might throw in another prospect but not another one of there top prospect like askarov. If they are rebuilding then they can retain a million or even 2 and get some great value back for Johansen.



    Lol look what they just got for him they got about 2-3 times the value you were offering
    24 juill. 2022 à 19 h 39
    #8
    Lets go Preds
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,858
    Mentions "j'aime": 915
    Quoting: Dekes
    Lol look what they just got for him they got about 2-3 times the value you were offering


    True that was an overpayment by Florida and everyone was who has a right mind can see it was a major overpayment. On the flip side if they don’t get hubes and weeger signed it won’t look that hot. But they still have the option of selling where huberdeau will bring back at least a 1st and a top prospect. Plus weeger could bring back at least a 1st.
    Man if I was Calgary I would go full rebuild if I can’t those 2 signed but they have an owner that is against a rebuild
    Dekes a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage