SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames try to stay competitive

Créé par: BigBradT
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2022
Publié: 21 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Competitive is a stretch lets be honest, but I don't see the Flames going into a quick rebuild, I believe they will instead try and retool.
Explanations;
-Tkachuk is gone, we know that, and the alleged list of teams he proposed apparently wasn't true, so NJ is still a possibility, and I like the return of Bratt, who will fit in nicely on a line with Mangiapane and Lindholm, 2 early round picks and a prospect in Stillman. NJ also gets a top tier winger they can fit with one of Hischier or Hughes.
-Mangiapane contrcat as well as Kylington contract are nothing unseen so far in terms of projected contracts
-Phillips accepts QO and maybe finally gets his shot at some NHL minutes if Monahan continues to play poorly, in which case we can try and move him and a mid round pick to a team scraping the cap floor (ANA, ARI) in return for maybe a late round pick or struggling prospect (Not really necessary as he only has 1 year left, unless the Flames have some big moves in the works.)
-Ruzicka signs a 2 year deal worth about 100k more than his QO for 2 years, hoping he can settle in and continue to play well as he did in his brief stint last year, him and Lucic played well together so Lucic stays for his last deal.
-It's finally Pelletier's time, give him a shot at the big leagues and if he is struggling Rooney can sub in his spot and Lewis is back in lineup.
-Bring back Stone for a one year deal in case Valimaki is struggling.
-Just to justify Lucic on PP1, Sutter utilized him there in front of the net last year, idk if I agree with it but he'll stay for now.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
55 250 000 $
2850 000 $
1878 500 $
77 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Bratt, Jesper [Droits de RFA]
  2. Stillman, Chase
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $71 616 833 $0 $200 000 $10 883 167 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
878 500 $878 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 6
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,629
Mentions "j'aime": 22,724
Couldn't the Flames stay competitive by just holding onto Tkachuk? Now I think they should trade him,but doubt if they get that return.
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 7
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: palhal
Couldn't the Flames stay competitive by just holding onto Tkachuk? Now I think they should trade him,but doubt if they get that return.


Tkachuk won't sign with us
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Yes, I'd do that. We can probably give u foote or Mukhamadulin who are better prospects than Stillman
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Devsfan25
Yes, I'd do that. We can probably give u foote or Mukhamadulin who are better prospects than Stillman


Mukhamadulin would be a good sub i think, I just didn't want to make the trade seem too lopsided
Devsfan25 a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: BigBradT
Mukhamadulin would be a good sub i think, I just didn't want to make the trade seem too lopsided


Just posted my own ACGM so u can see the full trade I proposed
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 11
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Devsfan25
Just posted my own ACGM so u can see the full trade I proposed


I think if we wanted to go more of the rebuild route your proposed trade is better
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: BigBradT
I think if we wanted to go more of the rebuild route your proposed trade is better


Yup. All depends what CGY management wants to do
BigBradT a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 12
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,629
Mentions "j'aime": 22,724
Quoting: BigBradT
Tkachuk won't sign with us


He won't see long term, but he is going to be a Flame this year due to his arbitration .
UFAs come and go all the time.....why is should anyone think Tkachuk (or Gaudreau) would be any different. Funny how homer fans get upset if one of their own leave via UFA, but are OK with signing "other teams" UFA....like Markstrom, Coleman, and Tanev.
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 14
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,325
Mentions "j'aime": 1,339
Quoting: palhal
He won't see long term, but he is going to be a Flame this year due to his arbitration .
UFAs come and go all the time.....why is should anyone think Tkachuk (or Gaudreau) would be any different. Funny how homer fans get upset if one of their own leave via UFA, but are OK with signing "other teams" UFA....like Markstrom, Coleman, and Tanev.


Do u follow hockey? It came out yesterday. He’s being moved. Open Twitter
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 14
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: palhal
He won't see long term, but he is going to be a Flame this year due to his arbitration .
UFAs come and go all the time.....why is should anyone think Tkachuk (or Gaudreau) would be any different. Funny how homer fans get upset if one of their own leave via UFA, but are OK with signing "other teams" UFA....like Markstrom, Coleman, and Tanev.


In all the reports I've seen it seems as if a trade is imminent
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 21
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,629
Mentions "j'aime": 22,724
Quoting: BigBradT
In all the reports I've seen it seems as if a trade is imminent


OK let say he is traded. No reason why the Flames can't be competitive even with Tkachuk and Gaudreau gone. Just spend that 18m that had been allowed for those two wisely.
Certainly a team via trade isn't going to give up a whole lot, unless Tkachuk is signed long term. But if the trade as proposed went down, the Flames are still a playoff team, and next year with non value contracts Monahan and Lucic off the books, Flamers could reload immediately.
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 25
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,326
Mentions "j'aime": 1,895
This is a very realistic Tkachuk return imo
21 juill. 2022 à 11 h 29
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: palhal
OK let say he is traded. No reason why the Flames can't be competitive even with Tkachuk and Gaudreau gone. Just spend that 18m that had been allowed for those two wisely.
Certainly a team via trade isn't going to give up a whole lot, unless Tkachuk is signed long term. But if the trade as proposed went down, the Flames are still a playoff team, and next year with non value contracts Monahan and Lucic off the books, Flamers could reload immediately.


Yeah the whole point of the moves i made were to stay competitive. I tried to follow the direction i think the Flames management will go, and unless we sign Kadri I don't really see us being huge spenders this free agency, especially with most of the big names off the market already. I like your point about next year with lucic and monahan off the books, I definetly think we can make some moves
palhal a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage