SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Magic Mike

Créé par: icehawk2006
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2022
Publié: 7 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 150 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 950 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
2.
CHI
  1. Balcers, Rūdolfs
  2. Wiesblatt, Ozzy
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
2022 1st Round
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $71 755 834 $0 $465 000 $10 744 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2022 à 13 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,067
Mentions "j'aime": 1,939
Honestly zero sense for buffalo to do this. Pretty much the same lotto ticket in the 5th round as the 3rd round.
Shibbal18 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 13 h 29
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,405
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
Ah yes, Buffalos biggest need... LD, there would only be 7 players above Simek on that depth chart
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 4
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Honestly zero sense for buffalo to do this. Pretty much the same lotto ticket in the 5th round as the 3rd round.


So your GM didnt say he was going to weaponize cap space to get better assets?? lol dude, the difference between a 5th and 3rd rounder is nearly a 20% to play 200 games in the nhl...

anyways, buffalo, arizona, chicago, who cares where he goes.
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,643
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: IconicHawk
Chicago just laughs at that offer


I don't think it's enough or that CHI should even entertain trading DeBrincat unless it's a ridiculous offer, but I don't think this offer is that far off in value since the 11OA is included.
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: poeticentropy
I don't think it's enough or that CHI should even entertain trading DeBrincat unless it's a ridiculous offer, but I don't think this offer is that far off in value since the 11OA is included.


Thanks. its pretty spot on considering the QO required if the Sharks want to re-sign him. contract structure is a big part of the reason that it wont be more than this kind of trade. He could take the QO and walk right to FA, so its higher risk for any team, which means lower offers.
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 28
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: poeticentropy
I don't think it's enough or that CHI should even entertain trading DeBrincat unless it's a ridiculous offer, but I don't think this offer is that far off in value since the 11OA is included.


Also think Chicago is dumb to trade Alex, but yet that is what they are intent on doing.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,643
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: icehawk2006
Also think Chicago is dumb to trade Alex, but yet that is what they are intent on doing.


If they do I can't imagine that Kane will want to stay, and losing both players means terrible things for ticket sales.

Seems almost identical to our Meier situation. Team doesn't want to trade but will entertain offers. Has insane QO. Would mean bad things for sales and roster morale if he was removed.
icehawk2006 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 15 h 36
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 4,067
Mentions "j'aime": 1,939
Quoting: icehawk2006
So your GM didnt say he was going to weaponize cap space to get better assets?? lol dude, the difference between a 5th and 3rd rounder is nearly a 20% to play 200 games in the nhl...

anyways, buffalo, arizona, chicago, who cares where he goes.


Lmfao. Moving from a round and half on picks that practically have the same percentage of success isn't weaponizing cap space, it's wasting it.

No team should do that trade, including Arizona or Chicago lol, it's absolutely trash.

16th for murray and 7th, along with murray retention is weaponizing cap space. Too bad murray said no. Love fans think swapping bull poop picks worth throwing the money away.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2022 à 1 h 28
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Lmfao. Moving from a round and half on picks that practically have the same percentage of success isn't weaponizing cap space, it's wasting it.

No team should do that trade, including Arizona or Chicago lol, it's absolutely trash.

16th for murray and 7th, along with murray retention is weaponizing cap space. Too bad murray said no. Love fans think swapping bull poop picks worth throwing the money away.


The fact you think that maximizing value in picks while gaining a serviceable nhl defenseman (even tanking teams need those) is something to scoff at tells me all I need to know about how much you know about how this business works and how much of an utter moron you are.

Comparing a goalie that’s substantially overpaid to a defenseman who’s only moderately overpaid, and for less term, thinking you’re the smartest and then assuming I’m a common fan are also signs of your pure stupidity.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage