SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Somewhat competitive

Créé par: DannySavior
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2022
Publié: 23 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 875 000 $
2900 000 $
22 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
33 500 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $72 008 334 $0 $300 000 $10 491 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2022 à 21 h 32
#1
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,485
Mentions "j'aime": 6,457
Why do you think Edmonton trades Puljujarvi for a rental netminder, and why do they add a pick to boot?
Rocky et StonyOil a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 11 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,643
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Why do you think Edmonton trades Puljujarvi for a rental netminder, and why do they add a pick to boot?


Agree with this. I tried making a SJ ACGM with Puljujarvi but from EDM's perspective I don't know why they'd do that when they could just sign a UFA goalie for maybe a little more. Plus Reimer has a NTC. Not sure how EDM is going to sign both Yaramoto and Puljujarvi.
24 juin 2022 à 21 h 23
#3
Démarrer sujet
Danny Mr. GM Briere
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 622
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Why do you think Edmonton trades Puljujarvi for a rental netminder, and why do they add a pick to boot?


because that rental netminder is making half what his services provide. Another alternative is that the Sharks just offersheet Puljujarvi and the Oilers get a 2nd round pick and no goalie

idk maybe the oilers might want a piece that makes them more competitive now rather than a lottery ticket that could be good or could be garbage but likely the latter... it was more so a generous offer than anything else. There are plenty of teams that are willing to give up a 2nd to offer 4.2M to Puljujarvi. The Oilers are not willing to offer him this amount of money. So yeah thats kinda my rationale
25 juin 2022 à 0 h 16
#4
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,485
Mentions "j'aime": 6,457
Quoting: Sicksi
because that rental netminder is making half what his services provide. Another alternative is that the Sharks just offersheet Puljujarvi and the Oilers get a 2nd round pick and no goalie

idk maybe the oilers might want a piece that makes them more competitive now rather than a lottery ticket that could be good or could be garbage but likely the latter... it was more so a generous offer than anything else. There are plenty of teams that are willing to give up a 2nd to offer 4.2M to Puljujarvi. The Oilers are not willing to offer him this amount of money. So yeah thats kinda my rationale


Look I dont doubt the Oilers are going to poo in their own hands regarding the Puljujarvi situation: it's kind of what they're good at. The Oilers can realistically sign both Puljujarvi and Yamamoto this offseason - remember they're allowed to exceed the cap by 10% over the summer.

Until we see Edmonton put pen to paper on either JR or JP, Reimer is a rental and you're still undervaluing Puljujarvi in this deal.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage