SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto trades

Créé par: Terry_AkiSauce
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2022
Publié: 22 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
31 750 000 $
31 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Demko, Thatcher
  2. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
VAN
  1. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Niemelä, Topi
  4. Robertson, Nicholas
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
NYI
  1. Muzzin, Jake
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
4.
TOR
  1. Brown, Connor (1 800 000 $ retained)
OTT
  1. Kase, Ondrej [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 433 116 $212 500 $0 $66 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 5
#51
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
I'll take what we have over what the Canucks have every day of the week


More second round appearances than the Leafs in the past 15 years
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 6
#52
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Juiceman
More second round appearances than the Leafs in the past 15 years


same amount of cups and one of the teams is currently much better than the other
SoftGuentzels a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 7
#53
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
same amount of cups and one of the teams is currently much better than the other


Lol I’m not continuing this pointless squabble

Imagine being the person making a extremely poorly thought out ACGM, going onto defend poorly thought out ACGM, and then begin insulting other fanbases because you can’t accept that your ACGM just makes no sense
Knuckl3s et The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 9
#54
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Juiceman
Lol I’m not continuing this pointless squabble

Imagine being the person making a extremely poorly thought out ACGM, going onto defend poorly thought out ACGM, and then begin insulting other fanbases because you can’t accept that your ACGM just makes no sense


You insulted the leafs fanbase first hahhahahaha - enjoy bruce boudreau buddy we didnt even want him as an assistant
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 11
#55
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
You insulted the leafs fanbase first hahhahahaha - enjoy bruce boudreau buddy we didnt even want him as an assistant


Wow going off and saying something completely irrelevant and unrelated to the conversation. Color me shocked. If you’re so upset about me replying to you, go ahead and add me to your ignore list
Knuckl3s et The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 15
#56
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: Juiceman
More second round appearances than the Leafs in the past 15 years


You're right, nucks are a wagon frfr. Wagons fire their coach midway through the season
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 16
#57
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
More second round appearances than the Leafs in the past 15 years


And it's not like the Canucks are stuck in mediocrity like some people believe, there are legitimate ways for them to improve themselves this very off-season, not to mention their core isn't as old as Toronto's. Lastly, OEL's contract is actually buyout friendly in a year unlike Tavares is
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 18
#58
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Knuckl3s
And it's not like the Canucks are stuck in mediocrity like some people believe, there are legitimate ways for them to improve themselves this very off-season, not to mention their core isn't as old as Toronto's. Lastly, OEL's contract is actually buyout friendly in a year unlike Tavares is


Yeah must suck having to buy out a player you just traded for, meanwhile we have no reason to buy out JT
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 20
#59
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: SoftGuentzels
Overpay by the Leafs, as a nucks fan


You’re literally a Leafs fan?
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 21
#60
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Yeah must suck having to buy out a player you just traded for, meanwhile we have no reason to buy out JT


The team knew it would be a possibility when they traded for him. Doubt the same thinking was taken into account when signing Tavares
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 21
#61
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Yeah must suck having to buy out a player you just traded for, meanwhile we have no reason to buy out JT


Gonna blame us for a bad GM? It’s not like we have any control over what our team does…
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 16 h 22
#62
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: SoftGuentzels
You're right, nucks are a wagon frfr. Wagons fire their coach midway through the season

You sound like quite the Canucks fan. Oh wait…
Knuckl3s et The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2022 à 17 h 18
#63
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,030
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
I don't know what you consider tier 1 prospects but I don't think those guys ever get traded. Niemela is a top 25 prospect in the league (according to many, many lists), could see Knies getting swapped with NRob here.. Not that this trade would ever happen but when considering trades of the past, its not horrible value


I will try to ignore the cringe baiting and trolling from earlier in this post and answer you honestly.

A tier one prospect would be a player who projects higher than middle of the lineup. Robertson could be a decent middle 6 scorer. Niemela had a good season, probably has top 4 upside. Knies I like a lot but again we’re talking a 2nd liner ceiling. Lots of quantity, but no A level piece

For reference, Canucks rejected Chytil, Lunqist, and a 1st for Miller alone. Lundqvist and niemela have similar value. Chytil has more value than Robertson. So literally half the package you offered does not land miller on his own.

The other half? A cap dump, another late first, and a good forward prospect in knies. Simply nowhere near enough for Demko alone. I sincerely believe the Canucks would not trade Demko for the 2nd overal pick from New Jersey, let alone the package you have here.

So, this package does not lend miller and Demko. Splitting the package in half does not one either player individually either.

If the trade was for only miller at 50%, we’d be talking probably liljegren, knies, and a pick. Since Dubas didn’t want to trade a 1st at the deadline, I extremely doubt he would have any interest in trading a package that big for miller.

Now consider that Demko is more valuable to the Canucks than miller is. The package to get Demko would have to be massive
22 juin 2022 à 17 h 34
#64
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: The_Rocket
I will try to ignore the cringe baiting and trolling from earlier in this post and answer you honestly.

A tier one prospect would be a player who projects higher than middle of the lineup. Robertson could be a decent middle 6 scorer. Niemela had a good season, probably has top 4 upside. Knies I like a lot but again we’re talking a 2nd liner ceiling. Lots of quantity, but no A level piece

For reference, Canucks rejected Chytil, Lunqist, and a 1st for Miller alone. Lundqvist and niemela have similar value. Chytil has more value than Robertson. So literally half the package you offered does not land miller on his own.

The other half? A cap dump, another late first, and a good forward prospect in knies. Simply nowhere near enough for Demko alone. I sincerely believe the Canucks would not trade Demko for the 2nd overal pick from New Jersey, let alone the package you have here.

So, this package does not lend miller and Demko. Splitting the package in half does not one either player individually either.

If the trade was for only miller at 50%, we’d be talking probably liljegren, knies, and a pick. Since Dubas didn’t want to trade a 1st at the deadline, I extremely doubt he would have any interest in trading a package that big for miller.

Now consider that Demko is more valuable to the Canucks than miller is. The package to get Demko would have to be massive


Honestly, was only trolling due to the absolute overreaction to the trade. I will say that your projections for the prospects are off, though. Robertson would be a decent middle 6 scorer in the NHL tomorrow. He projects as a top 6 winger with 40 goal upside - Debrincat comparable. Knies' ceiling is much higher than a second liner, he's generated at a first line prospect rate in the NCAA and has very clearly elite tendencies in his game - guy could end up being an absolute star, not saying its likely but his floor is much closer to the 2nd line than his ceiling. You're right on Niemela, likely a top 4 guy.

I also want to say this trade would ONLY happen if VAN decided to blow it up for some reason. They shouldn't trade either of these players but obviously if they decide to tank and not compete for the next few years, this is the exact package they'd be looking for
22 juin 2022 à 18 h 36
#65
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,030
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Honestly, was only trolling due to the absolute overreaction to the trade. I will say that your projections for the prospects are off, though. Robertson would be a decent middle 6 scorer in the NHL tomorrow. He projects as a top 6 winger with 40 goal upside - Debrincat comparable. Knies' ceiling is much higher than a second liner, he's generated at a first line prospect rate in the NCAA and has very clearly elite tendencies in his game - guy could end up being an absolute star, not saying its likely but his floor is much closer to the 2nd line than his ceiling. You're right on Niemela, likely a top 4 guy.

I also want to say this trade would ONLY happen if VAN decided to blow it up for some reason. They shouldn't trade either of these players but obviously if they decide to tank and not compete for the next few years, this is the exact package they'd be looking for


I think we will have to agree to disagree on the prospect projections. I am probably less bullish on prospects than most though so very easily I could be underrating them.
22 juin 2022 à 18 h 39
#66
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: The_Rocket
I think we will have to agree to disagree on the prospect projections. I am probably less bullish on prospects than most though so very easily I could be underrating them.


I think it was much easier to take established players over prospects a few years ago but the talent level is so high in young players that they seem to hit the ground running more often than not
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage