SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

The only one that makes for the Leafs to get

Créé par: Steverap83
Publié: 11 juin 2022 à 20 h 30
Plafond salarial: 82 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 185/186 (99%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Rangers de New YorkRangers de New York

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Georgiev, AlexandarRangers de New YorkLNH-0 $011-------00
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Holl, JustinMaple Leafs de TorontoLNH-1 989 247 $011---0000--
Woll, JosephExempté du ballottageMaple Leafs de TorontoMineures-0 $011-------00
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial13 458 531 $1433472410
Variation-1 989 247 $021000
Final11 469 284 $ (↓)1435 (↑)48 (↑)2410000

Logo de Maple Leafs de TorontoMaple Leafs de Toronto

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Holl, JustinMaple Leafs de TorontoLNH-1 989 247 $011---0000--
Woll, JosephExempté du ballottageMaple Leafs de TorontoMineures-0 $011-------00
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Georgiev, AlexandarRangers de New YorkLNH-0 $011-------00
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial7 844 384 $173854338
Variation1 989 247 $0-2-1000
Final9 833 631 $ (↑)1736 (↓)53 (↓)338000
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 43
#1
odyssey
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
would be nice
Steverap83 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2022 à 21 h 24
#2
jzooks37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 6
they would have to give rangers a pick or something holl doesn't have that much value to them
11 juin 2022 à 23 h 42
#3
budgeteam
couldnt afford 2nd t
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 431
Someone will give them AT LEAST 2nd round pick for Georgiev, probably a lot more. They will sign him to a mid-term deal to be their starter. The above package isn't better than what they will get. From Toronto, it probably takes their 1st rounder.

If a team wants a 1B or better, the goalie market is very thin for UFAs. There are only 14 UFA goalies who played more than 20 games. Out of those 14, you can remove 9 or 10 instantly because they either are retiring or leaving the league (Koskinen, Anderson), they will be picky about where they sign (Fleury), they stink or aren't seen as anything more than fringe backups (Greiss, Lankinen, Gillies, Jones, Tokarski), or they are likely to remain with their current team (Kuemper).

That leaves Husso, Campbell, DeSmith, Holtby, and maybe Wedgewood since he had a strong close to the season in Dallas. You can reasonably assume that at least 1 of those guys stay with their current team as well.

The Rangers probably get a very nice return for Georgiev. There won't be many options in net. It's why the Leafs Matt Murray speculation by Chris Johnston isn't as crazy as it seems (assuming there are cap considerations).
12 juin 2022 à 0 h 41
#4
Steverap83
Démarrer sujet
Stevenrap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Matt Murray Will not happen or it would have been done years ago before he went to Ottawa Mackenzie Blackwood would be a better option than Murray
Quoting: budgeteam
Someone will give them AT LEAST 2nd round pick for Georgiev, probably a lot more. They will sign him to a mid-term deal to be their starter. The above package isn't better than what they will get. From Toronto, it probably takes their 1st rounder.

If a team wants a 1B or better, the goalie market is very thin for UFAs. There are only 14 UFA goalies who played more than 20 games. Out of those 14, you can remove 9 or 10 instantly because they either are





retiring or leaving the league (Koskinen, Anderson), they will be picky about where they sign (Fleury), they stink or aren't seen as anything more than fringe backups (Greiss, Lankinen, Gillies, Jones, Tokarski), or they are likely to remain with their current team (Kuemper).

That leaves Husso, Campbell, DeSmith, Holtby, and maybe Wedgewood since he had a strong close to the season in Dallas. You can reasonably assume that at least 1 of those guys stay with their current team as well.

The Rangers probably get a very nice return for Georgiev. There won't be many options in net. It's why the Leafs Matt Murray speculation by Chris Johnston isn't as crazy as it seems (assuming there are cap considerations).


Matt Murray Will not happen or it would have been done years ago before he went to Ottawa Mackenzie Blackwood would be a better option than Murray
12 juin 2022 à 1 h 27
#5
budgeteam
couldnt afford 2nd t
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 431
Quoting: Steverap83
Matt Murray Will not happen or it would have been done years ago before he went to Ottawa Mackenzie Blackwood would be a better option than Murray

Matt Murray Will not happen or it would have been done years ago before he went to Ottawa Mackenzie Blackwood would be a better option than Murray


Leafs could not afford him when he was available previously. Their cap was too tight. He clearly was trying to cash in. The Blackhawks had consummated a trade with Pittsburgh before Ottawa did, but it was contingent on an extension. Murray wanted more than they wanted to give him. Then Ottawa acquired him by giving him one of the largest goalie cap hits in the league.

The Leafs aren't going to acquire him at full ticket if they do. There will be cap considerations like Ottawa taking a bad contract and retaining. I assume it will be cap neutral for Toronto, with Toronto sending Ottawa some sunk cost contracts.
12 juin 2022 à 1 h 44
#6
Steverap83
Démarrer sujet
Stevenrap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: budgeteam
Leafs could not afford him when he was available previously. Their cap was too tight. He clearly was trying to cash in. The Blackhawks had consummated a trade with Pittsburgh before Ottawa did, but it was contingent on an extension. Murray wanted more than they wanted to give him. Then Ottawa acquired him by giving him one of the largest goalie cap hits in the league.

The Leafs aren't going to acquire him at full ticket if they do. There will be cap considerations like Ottawa taking a bad contract and retaining. I assume it will be cap neutral for Toronto, with Toronto sending Ottawa some sunk cost contracts.


It would be a bad move because injury history
12 juin 2022 à 2 h 44
#7
budgeteam
couldnt afford 2nd t
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 431
Quoting: Steverap83
It would be a bad move because injury history


I don't disagree.
13 juin 2022 à 0 h 23
#8
CanucksInPurgatory
Bruce, there it goes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 375
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Yep, agreed
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage