SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Were a team

Créé par: Napparific
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 mai 2022
Publié: 22 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Heard the leafs and ducks had talked shop on Gibson before... Wondering about the acquisition cost. Mrazek is included just to make money work, but if that was a no go for the ducks he could be removed from the trade and the leafs could add a 1st + later round picks to get cap retention from the ducks
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Robertson, Nicholas
  4. Sandin, Rasmus [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
ARI
  1. Holl, Justin
Détails additionnels:
He's a fine 3rd pair guy, there's a team that would take him
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 593 116 $212 500 $0 $-93 116 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
837 500 $837 500 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Boy little bit of editing. Kerfoot sucks I don't see Anaheim taking him. Certainly won't take Mrazek. Big no no there. Eliminate both of them you might be a little closer.
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 4
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
Boy little bit of editing. Kerfoot sucks I don't see Anaheim taking him. Certainly won't take Mrazek. Big no no there. Eliminate both of them you might be a little closer.


?? Kerfoot doesn't suck lol, Anaheim could absolutely use him. Mrazek, as I explained, is for money to work. Otherwise there could be additional picks for cap retention
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
I know with cap space its hard but even in this instance if I'm Toronto I just re-sign Soup rather than making huge changes that I don't think improve the situation anyway.
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 5
#4
JOSHUA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 394
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Gibson numbers have been bad. Dont know why your trading that much for a .904% goalie. Gibson half retain for 2nd round pick kerfoot and mrazek.
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Napparific
?? Kerfoot doesn't suck lol, Anaheim could absolutely use him. Mrazek, as I explained, is for money to work. Otherwise there could be additional picks for cap retention


Kerfoot definitely sucks.
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Napparific
?? Kerfoot doesn't suck lol, Anaheim could absolutely use him. Mrazek, as I explained, is for money to work. Otherwise there could be additional picks for cap retention


unknown.png?width=1298&height=925
22 mai 2022 à 22 h 23
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
unknown.png?width=1298&height=925


If WAR models were actual predictors of hockey the leafs would've won a cup this century
22 mai 2022 à 23 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Napparific
If WAR models were actual predictors of hockey the leafs would've won a cup this century


no not really. Obviously this is season for 1. It is a good predictor of season, but playoffs is a psychological thing. So I would have to disagree.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage