SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Run Silent Run Deep

Créé par: Knuckl3s
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2022
Publié: 12 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
3800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
2950 000 $
86 400 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Halak, Jaroslav
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Chytil, Filip
  2. Jones, Zachary
  3. Kravtsov, Vitali [Droits de RFA]
  4. Lundkvist, Nils
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Miller, J.T.
Détails additionnels:
Miller signs 6 x 7.85M
3.
VAN
  1. Kiviranta, Joel
  2. Tufte, Riley [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Myers, Tyler (1 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 376 842 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $10 123 158 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Halak, Jaroslav
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai 2022 à 7 h 4
#1
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 398
Mentions "j'aime": 87
So we're tanking for Bedard?
12 mai 2022 à 7 h 9
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigTramFan
So we're tanking for Bedard?


Lol, that's not possible with this roster
12 mai 2022 à 8 h 32
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,784
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Lol, that's not possible with this roster


Yes it is. That defense is trash.

When you have to rely top4 minutes of Luke Schenn and Travis Dermott your team has a problem worth fixing. Demko alone can only do so much.

Offensively speaking the team is also worse. You don't have Miller to score those 90 points. Zucker and Chytil add 20 points each.

This is a bottom-5 team.

And btw I don't think anyone accepts these proposals. DAL has better use for that money, rentals don't gather out such packages and no one wants OEL.
12 mai 2022 à 9 h 25
#4
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,030
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
Quoting: justaBoss
Yes it is. That defense is trash.

When you have to rely top4 minutes of Luke Schenn and Travis Dermott your team has a problem worth fixing. Demko alone can only do so much.

Offensively speaking the team is also worse. You don't have Miller to score those 90 points. Zucker and Chytil add 20 points each.

This is a bottom-5 team.

And btw I don't think anyone accepts these proposals. DAL has better use for that money, rentals don't gather out such packages and no one wants OEL.


“Rentals don’t get her such packages” I mean Seth Jones literally got a bigger haul last off season. Seth Jones plus pick 32 plus a 6th for pick #12, pick 44, Adam boqvist, and then ANOTHER 1st which is going to be 6th overall this year.

Perfectly realistic to assume Miller could pull this package
12 mai 2022 à 10 h 16
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,784
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: The_Rocket
“Rentals don’t get her such packages” I mean Seth Jones literally got a bigger haul last off season. Seth Jones plus pick 32 plus a 6th for pick #12, pick 44, Adam boqvist, and then ANOTHER 1st which is going to be 6th overall this year.

Perfectly realistic to assume Miller could pull this package


Seth Jones was perceived as top10 D-man in the league in CBJ. Miller's barely a top20 center with one huge outlier of a year.

And the common opinion pretty much is that the Jones trade is one of the worst moves in last 5 years (although partly because of that contract).
12 mai 2022 à 17 h 44
#6
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 398
Mentions "j'aime": 87
The package proposed for Miller is a 3LW + 3 fringe NHL players + a 2023 1st (probably in the 15-30 range). Not exactly what I'd call a "haul"

VAN would be better going after a return that nets them a fewer number of weak pieces and trading for something more proven or with a higher potential ceiling. Otherwise just resign Miller. In 3 seasons in VAN he is averaging over 1.07 ppg.
13 mai 2022 à 2 h 41
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: justaBoss
Yes it is. That defense is trash.

When you have to rely top4 minutes of Luke Schenn and Travis Dermott your team has a problem worth fixing. Demko alone can only do so much.

Offensively speaking the team is also worse. You don't have Miller to score those 90 points. Zucker and Chytil add 20 points each.

This is a bottom-5 team.

And btw I don't think anyone accepts these proposals. DAL has better use for that money, rentals don't gather out such packages and no one wants OEL.


The defense isn't trash, you underestimate how good Luke Schenn is, and how much potential guys like Rathbone and Lundkvist have. Obviously with Dermott on the 2nd pair the team can't have Stanley cup aspirations, but clearly I'm not trying to be all that ambitious here

Pettersson, Hughes, and Podkolzin will all take steps next season (at least they should), and guys like Boeser, Hoglander, and Dickinson should bounce back. This team won't underachieve the way they did this last season, and it's not like I'm running things back here

When it comes to Chytil and Zucker, there are still good players in them, just haven't been optimal fits with their current teams

Bottom line is, as long as this roster has Pettersson, Hughes, and Demko, they will NEVER be bad enough to be bottom five

You are so so wrong on so many levels
13 mai 2022 à 2 h 43
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigTramFan
The package proposed for Miller is a 3LW + 3 fringe NHL players + a 2023 1st (probably in the 15-30 range). Not exactly what I'd call a "haul"

VAN would be better going after a return that nets them a fewer number of weak pieces and trading for something more proven or with a higher potential ceiling. Otherwise just resign Miller. In 3 seasons in VAN he is averaging over 1.07 ppg.


Kravtsov and Chytil are more reclamation projects, and I wouldn't call Chytil a fringe NHLer. Jones and Lundkvist are both prospects
13 mai 2022 à 3 h 50
#9
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 398
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Kravtsov and Chytil are more reclamation projects, and I wouldn't call Chytil a fringe NHLer. Jones and Lundkvist are both prospects


Sorry for the confusion...

The 3LW = Chytil (we already have Pearson, Dickinson, Hoglander that can play 3LW)

The 3 fringe NHLers are:
Lundkvist - played 25 NHL games this season
Kravtsov - played 20 NHL games last season, none this season
Jones - played 22 games over last 2 seasons

They are not really prospects anymore, they are tweeners struggling to make an NHL roster that haven't performed very well at the NHL level.

VAN already has Rathbone, who is a smaller sized Dman like Lundkvist and Jones, and he is out-performing both in the AHL.

I guess my point is that I would want a serious piece coming back in a trade for Miller (like a high pick or a top level prospect or player) not a 5 low level guys and a late pick.
13 mai 2022 à 3 h 56
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigTramFan
Sorry for the confusion...

The 3LW = Chytil (we already have Pearson, Dickinson, Hoglander that can play 3LW)

The 3 fringe NHLers are:
Lundkvist - played 25 NHL games this season
Kravtsov - played 20 NHL games last season, none this season
Jones - played 22 games over last 2 seasons

They are not really prospects anymore, they are tweeners struggling to make an NHL roster that haven't performed very well at the NHL level.

VAN already has Rathbone, who is a smaller sized Dman like Lundkvist and Jones, and he is out-performing both in the AHL.

I guess my point is that I would want a serious piece coming back in a trade for Miller (like a high pick or a top level prospect or player) not a 5 low level guys and a late pick.


I think the 1st rounder qualifies as a significant piece, plus it's in 2023 which is reported to be a deep draft. You can't call Lundkvist a fringe NHLer when he still has 2 more years on his ELC. With Chytil, he isn't even in his prime, and he's had some decent spurts of productivity at the NHL level. Plenty of NHL scoring wingers are streaky
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage