SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If team NA was assembled today

Créé par: asauer1122
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 5 avr. 2022
Publié: 5 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The last NA team would for sure out play this squad, but still very talented
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
26100 000 002 $68 860 508 $0 $16 900 000 $31 139 494 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 330 674 $8 330 674 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Power, Owen
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 150 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 avr. 2022 à 13 h 57
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Hayton, Comer, Cozens, Caufield, Laf, Patrick and Dach over Zegras?!?!?!
5 avr. 2022 à 14 h 0
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,638
Mentions "j'aime": 585
Quoting: Lenny7
Hayton, Comer, Cozens, Caufield, Laf, Patrick and Dach over Zegras?!?!?!


ill be honest missed him. adding in.

btw probably taking Cozens over zegras. Besides zegras having the fancy moves, cozens is the more complete player. Just look at any chart
5 avr. 2022 à 14 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: asauer1122
ill be honest missed him. adding in.

btw probably taking Cozens over zegras. Besides zegras having the fancy moves, cozens is the more complete player. Just look at any chart


That's such an L take. If you reduce Zegras to "fancy moves", you are basically acknowledging you haven't watched him play besides the few highlight reel goals. And if you wanna look at charts, let's start with Dom Luszczyszyn's cards (aka Dom at the athletic). Here, Zegras is better in every category (projected / pace):

Goals
Z: 20 / 21
C: 15 / 15

Assists
Z: 41 / 45
C: 24 / 27

Points too, obviously

Offense
Z: 6.9 / 12.1
C: -0.9 / -2.1

Defense
Z: 1.2 / -1.0
C: -3.3 / -3.8

GSVA
Z: 2.1 / 2.2
C: 0.5 / 0.5

This alone shows that not any chart shows that Cozens is allegedly the more complete player.
HeadHighSauce et Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2022 à 9 h 24
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,638
Mentions "j'aime": 585
Quoting: TZ11
That's such an L take. If you reduce Zegras to "fancy moves", you are basically acknowledging you haven't watched him play besides the few highlight reel goals. And if you wanna look at charts, let's start with Dom Luszczyszyn's cards (aka Dom at the athletic). Here, Zegras is better in every category (projected / pace):

Goals
Z: 20 / 21
C: 15 / 15

Assists
Z: 41 / 45
C: 24 / 27

Points too, obviously

Offense
Z: 6.9 / 12.1
C: -0.9 / -2.1

Defense
Z: 1.2 / -1.0
C: -3.3 / -3.8

GSVA
Z: 2.1 / 2.2
C: 0.5 / 0.5

This alone shows that not any chart shows that Cozens is allegedly the more complete player.


Cozens has a better GAR, xGAR (offense AND defense), better PP offense GAR, Better shorthanded GAR, xGAR, which doesnt say much for this argument of course cause zegras doesnt play 200ft game while cozens is a 200 ft player

So opinions are opinions, but your exact quote "This alone shows that not any chart shows that Cozens is allegedly the more complete player" is actually completely wrong and goes to show you dont have a ton of deep hockey knowledge except saying "wow that lacrosse goal was cool guys!!!"

Zegras is a good player but your statement is totally wrong. They are two totally different players and just so happens Cozens prides himself on being good both ends of the ice which will hurt his offence early in his career while zegras is all about offence but has awful defensive analytics.
6 avr. 2022 à 11 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: asauer1122
So opinions are opinions, but your exact quote "This alone shows that not any chart shows that Cozens is allegedly the more complete player" is actually completely wrong and goes to show you dont have a ton of deep hockey knowledge except saying "wow that lacrosse goal was cool guys!!!"


Huh? I only replied to your comment that "any" chart shows that Cozens is better which is simply untrue. Also, why put words in my mouth? I literally said that his "fancy moves" aren't the main part of his game and if you think that's how I view things, you're just assuming stupid ****. And why say I don't have a ton of deep hockey knowledge? You just didn't understand my comment. I never said who's actually better, I only said that not every chart proves your point, that's all.

Quoting: asauer1122
Zegras is a good player but your statement is totally wrong. They are two totally different players and just so happens Cozens prides himself on being good both ends of the ice which will hurt his offence early in his career while zegras is all about offence but has awful defensive analytics.


How can my statement be wrong when I literally just said that not any chart proves your point which I showed through the stats above. Additionally, I said that Zegras isn't just fancy which is a fact and anyone who actually knows Ducks hockey will tell you the same.

Quoting: asauer1122
Cozens has a better GAR, xGAR (offense AND defense), better PP offense GAR, Better shorthanded GAR, xGAR, which doesnt say much for this argument of course cause zegras doesnt play 200ft game while cozens is a 200 ft player


Zegras' xGAR is literally higher than Cozens'.
Zegras: 4.3
Cozens: 3.7

I'M not saying Zegras is 100% better. I'm just saying that you shouldn't reduce him to his flashiness because that proves you don't know how he plays. I'm also not trying to discredit Cozens here, he's made great improvements this season and I'm truly happy he's playing this well.
asauer1122 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage