RONDE 1 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
1 | - | best player | ||
2 | - | second best player | ||
3 | - | #1 defenseman | ||
4 | - | #1B center | ||
5 | - | defenseman | ||
6 | - | go for a center | ||
7 | - | winger | ||
8 | best player | |||
9 | - | need defenseman | ||
10 | - | the one who surprisinly drops. every year its someone so ill guess its him | ||
11 | - | we need a 2LD but we arent reaching that far for one. Likely to trade this pick for an NHL LD | ||
12 | - | seems like a san jose pick. | ||
13 | - | wentforward before, now defense | ||
14 | - | Boeser/Garland replacement????? | ||
15 | - | defense | ||
16 | - | stops dropping. | ||
17 | stacking the forward core | |||
18 | - | likely to trade pick | ||
19 | - | best player | ||
20 | - | best player--seems like a NSH pick tbh | ||
21 | - | best player. Likely to trade pick for Chychrun so i will assume this is arizona | ||
22 | - | seems so Washington | ||
23 | - | best player | ||
24 | idk saw some ducks fan say he really wanted Gleb | |||
25 | - | okay this is so toronto | ||
26 | - | idk what they need | ||
27 | best player | |||
28 | - | memes | ||
29 | - | letang future replacement? | ||
30 | build up the d core | |||
31 | no need for defeseman. another forward | |||
32 | build up the d core |
RONDE 2 | ÉQUIPE | ORIGINAL | JOUEUR | DéTAILS |
---|
33 | - | forward | ||
34 | - | same as ARZ. build up the d core | ||
35 | - | another forward | ||
36 | - | forward in first, defense now | ||
37 | - | seems like new jersey. defense in first, forward now | ||
38 | im picking for them so much bro | |||
39 | - | forward | ||
40 | - | im done explaining. | ||
41 | - | |||
42 | - | |||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | - | |||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | - | |||
49 | - | |||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | - | |||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | - | |||
57 | ||||
58 | first goalie? | |||
59 | - | |||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | - | |||
63 | ||||
64 | done |