SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Habs offseason

Créé par: JoelWard
Équipe: 2017-18 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2017
Publié: 24 avr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Kovalchuk, Ilya
15 750 000 $
15 500 000 $
66 350 000 $
Shipachyov, Vadim
14 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
COL
  1. Emelin, Alexei
  2. Juulsen, Noah
  3. McCarron, Michael
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (WSH)
4.
MTL
    Rights to Ilya Kovalchuk
    NJD
      Rights to Nathan Beaulieu
      Lowest of 2018 2nd round picks
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2018
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      2019
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      2020
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2175 500 000 $73 182 142 $0 $850 000 $2 317 858 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 2
      3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 4
      Kovalchuk, Ilya
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      Shipachyov, Vadim
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      6 350 000 $6 350 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 5
      839 166 $839 166 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      912 500 $912 500 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 5
      850 000 $850 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
      DG/DD
      NTC
      UFA - 1
      7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
      DD
      UFA - 9
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      DG
      UFA
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG/DD
      UFA - 3
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA

      Unités spéciales

      Avantage numérique 1
      Kovalchuk, I.
      Avantage numérique 2
      Shipachyov, V.
      Infériorité numérique 1
      Infériorité numérique 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      24 avr. 2017 à 14 h 26
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 54
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      I like it. I think a Galchenyuk for Fowler trade might be a bit more realistic since I'm not sure SJ has the depth to cover for losing Vlasic, but I like the idea. I wonder if Colorado would be willing to move Duchene for that price, comes down to their evaluation of Juulsen I guess, let's hope Sakic is very high on him lol.
      24 avr. 2017 à 14 h 43
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Joel Ward
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 80
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: texus8
      I like it. I think a Galchenyuk for Fowler trade might be a bit more realistic since I'm not sure SJ has the depth to cover for losing Vlasic, but I like the idea. I wonder if Colorado would be willing to move Duchene for that price, comes down to their evaluation of Juulsen I guess, let's hope Sakic is very high on him lol.


      Fowler certainly would be an alright consolation prize if the Ducks were willing to move him. It really depends on what San Jose wants to do this offseason, as they do have a older core and Jones, Vlasic, Hertl, Couture, and Pavelski all seeing their contracts expire over the span of a year. I'm really not sure what to think about Duchene, as I can't see Bergevin or Francis being willing to move Segachev or Hanifin for him. Perhaps Carolina could land him with Fleury/Bean and their first this year.
      24 avr. 2017 à 15 h 53
      #3
      NateElder12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2016
      Messages: 5,736
      Mentions "j'aime": 801
      Quoting: texus8
      I like it. I think a Galchenyuk for Fowler trade might be a bit more realistic since I'm not sure SJ has the depth to cover for losing Vlasic, but I like the idea. I wonder if Colorado would be willing to move Duchene for that price, comes down to their evaluation of Juulsen I guess, let's hope Sakic is very high on him lol.


      Fowler would cost a little more than Galchenyuk most likely. Probably would take Galchenyuk and one of Lehkonen/Sherbak/Mccarron at least.
      24 avr. 2017 à 16 h 36
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 54
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Modifié 24 avr. 2017 à 16 h 42
      Quoting: NateElder12


      Fowler would cost a little more than Galchenyuk most likely. Probably would take Galchenyuk and one of Lehkonen/Sherbak/Mccarron at least.


      I'm not sure I agree. Galchenyuk has some deficiencies but he is still a productive LW which is a position of need for Anaheim. He's 0.65 pts/game over the past 3 seasons combined, that would put him tied for third on the Ducks over that time span. He's young and they can sign him to a reasonable medium/long term contract. Fowler is not indispensable since they Have Theodore and Lindholm ready for top 4 roles on the left side, and Fowler only has one year left on his deal and is older than those guys. Would be a fair trade for both teams imo
      24 avr. 2017 à 17 h 2
      #5
      Leafs Rule
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 316
      Mentions "j'aime": 15
      Quoting: texus8
      I like it. I think a Galchenyuk for Fowler trade might be a bit more realistic since I'm not sure SJ has the depth to cover for losing Vlasic, but I like the idea. I wonder if Colorado would be willing to move Duchene for that price, comes down to their evaluation of Juulsen I guess, let's hope Sakic is very high on him lol.


      That's right, what Anaheim needs more of, players they CAN'T PROTECT.

      Kovalchuc for just that? No way. 1 star for you.
      24 avr. 2017 à 17 h 28
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 54
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Quoting: Dragongrave
      Quoting: texus8
      I like it. I think a Galchenyuk for Fowler trade might be a bit more realistic since I'm not sure SJ has the depth to cover for losing Vlasic, but I like the idea. I wonder if Colorado would be willing to move Duchene for that price, comes down to their evaluation of Juulsen I guess, let's hope Sakic is very high on him lol.


      That's right, what Anaheim needs more of, players they CAN'T PROTECT.

      Kovalchuc for just that? No way. 1 star for you.


      What do you mean with Anaheim players they can't protect?
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage