SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres have to have a big offseason

Créé par: GoSabres
Équipe: 2016-17 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2017
Publié: 11 avr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Jobs of coach and gm on the lines
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
Antipin, Viktor
2925 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
    Player to be named later
    VGK
    1. Ennis, Tyler
    2. Ullmark, Linus
    Détails additionnels:
    Ulmark is the bonus for taking moulson or Ennis
    2.
    WSH
    1. McCabe, Jake
    Détails additionnels:
    Washington needs cap space
    3.
    4.
    ANA
    1. Fasching, Hudson
    2. Girgensons, Zemgus
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (MIN)
    4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (WSH)
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2017
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2018
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2019
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2373 000 000 $59 833 413 $0 $4 335 000 $13 166 587 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 5
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C
    UFA - 2
    1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    689 167 $689 167 $ (Bonis de performance160 000 $$160K)
    AG
    UFA - 2
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    670 000 $670 000 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
    AD
    UFA - 2
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    718 333 $718 333 $ (Bonis de performance160 000 $$160K)
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    2 225 000 $2 225 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Antipin, Viktor
    925 000 $925 000 $
    5 142 857 $5 142 857 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    650 000 $650 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 avr. 2017 à 11 h 39
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2015
    Messages: 1,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    I feel like you could acquire Niskanen without giving up McCabe, from an outsider's perspective I'm not sure that the VAN deal is a good one, yes Horvat and Juolevi are really good but you're giving up 3 potentially core players for 2, and at this point I don't think that would be helpful
    11 avr. 2017 à 12 h 3
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    I feel like you could acquire Niskanen without giving up McCabe, from an outsider's perspective I'm not sure that the VAN deal is a good one, yes Horvat and Juolevi are really good but you're giving up 3 potentially core players for 2, and at this point I don't think that would be helpful


    although I'm not sold on juolevi as an nhler, kane with one year on his contract and guhle are hardly core players. if kane's stellar play continues he would be a great trade at TDL if the sabres wanted some futures.
    11 avr. 2017 à 13 h 33
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 493
    Mentions "j'aime": 30
    As a Canucks fan, veering off the road to a steady rebuild by trading both Horvat and Juolevi hurts but the return is there.
    I do want Reinhart, I am not sure Kane will deliver.

    The Canucks will be at the bottom for a couple seasons so we have some flexibility in offsetting D loss with the draft, and taking more salary back. (edit: I missed seeing Guhle, a LD, in the trade. I was saying I would take it at Horvat-Juolevi for Reinhart-Kane, the local storyline never hurts... until it backfires with partying)
    11 avr. 2017 à 14 h 23
    #4
    Eichel Tower
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 4,716
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
    Maybe you should put in you application for GM. I am not sure if the kids are ready, but so what you get great returns on your trades.
    11 avr. 2017 à 20 h 25
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 39
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Highly doubt the ducks move Vatanen, especially for that, and I just can't get behind that VAN trade. Plus you then have a whole lot of inexperience on the roster and putting them in big roles (Smith, Nylander, Juolevi, etc). Juolevi especially, jumping to the 1st pair right out of Juniors. Points for creativity though.
    11 avr. 2017 à 21 h 28
    #6
    thewookie1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,522
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,055
    Horrid trade with Vancouver, hurts us more than anything else. Our #2 Youngster, Top D prospect, and Top Goal Scorer for another teams high end youngster and high end d prospect. I'd rather keep our guys than go after the greener pastures illusion while sacrificing a 28 goal scorer in the process.

    Ullmark and Moulson maybe but not with Ennis; Ennis at least still has potential to be something again abiet small.

    No interest in Sami Vatanen but value seems ok, I honestly think Vatanen sucks and just has a tad more offensive skill than most run of the mill barrel scrapers.

    The McCabe-Niskanen deal is kinda useless as we may get better in the short term but will suffer in the long run.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage