SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What the sabres should have done

Créé par: ErikJohannsen
Équipe: 2016-17 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 3 mars 2017
Publié: 3 mars 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2017 (FLA)
2.
BUF
  1. De La Rose, Jacob
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2017 (MTL)
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (DET)
4.
BUF
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2018 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de WSH
Logo de DET
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2018
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
2019
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2073 000 000 $51 641 191 $0 $5 815 000 $21 358 809 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
UFA - 2
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
670 000 $670 000 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
AD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
2 225 000 $2 225 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
5 142 857 $5 142 857 $
DD
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mars 2017 à 20 h 14
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,377
Mentions "j'aime": 9,099
Modifié 3 mars 2017 à 20 h 26
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW
4 mars 2017 à 14 h 17
#2
GMTM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 0
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious
7 mars 2017 à 16 h 6
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 477
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Jeez we got some real critcs in the comments eh? I really don't think my propositions are that ridiculous that my GMing warrants a one star...I'd like to see one of you do better.

Quoting: GMTM
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious


Quoting: Shibbal18
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW
7 mars 2017 à 16 h 49
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,614
Mentions "j'aime": 6,752
Quoting: ErikJohannsen
Jeez we got some real critcs in the comments eh? I really don't think my propositions are that ridiculous that my GMing warrants a one star...I'd like to see one of you do better.

Quoting: GMTM
A 2nd and 5th for Kane? Hilarious


Quoting: Shibbal18
Why would they trade Kane for picks if they are trying to become a contender instead of a rebuild team. Kane is their best forward, they arent shopping him nor are they looking to dump him. If they trade him its for a player that helps immediately. Also GMTM was very open about teams not giving him an offer for Kuli or Franson. So yes they should have traded them, but it takes 2 teams to make a deal. McCormick is also done for his career. Gorges is not a top pairing dman, Larsson is done for the season, Moulson is a 4th liner, and Reinhart is Eichels RW


Judging by the reactions, I'm guessing there was a trade of Kane for a 2nd a 5th. The others are right, that is selling Kane short even if he may or may not have off ice issues etc. If you had to associate a value to Buffalo with Kane and a value to Buffalo minus Kane but with the two picks, I'd say your better off with Kane.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage