SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Center Depth Change

Créé par: aastorino1993
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 2 août 2021
Publié: 2 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Dvorak, Christian
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
2.
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de SEA
Logo de ARI
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $68 349 802 $0 $8 400 000 $13 150 198 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 août 2021 à 20 h 58
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,361
Mentions "j'aime": 24,176
Rangers are lowballers. Didn’t even offer Chytil for Eichel def not gonna offer him for Dvorak. Lmao
2 août 2021 à 21 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
With all that cap space, you actually diminish the teams C depth.
2 août 2021 à 21 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Kind of a lateral move to move out one C with term for another. We have Defensive pieces to substitute.
2 août 2021 à 21 h 52
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: SpaghettiHead11
With all that cap space, you actually diminish the teams C depth.


how? Dvorak takes stromes place as a younger 2c with panarin and goodrow is a center who wins almost 50% of his draws. Dvorak is a good player that may flourish with panarin
2 août 2021 à 22 h 1
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: Shakabakes
Kind of a lateral move to move out one C with term for another. We have Defensive pieces to substitute.


Moving out a 3C to get a 2C? an actual 2C with Goodrow as 3C, thats a pretty good center set up in my opinion. Strome is not good in the center circle and neither is Chytil which is why they would probably move him to the wing because Goodrow is a better center than him. Dvorak is a great 2-way forward that can score and produce.
2 août 2021 à 22 h 3
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: csick
Rangers are lowballers. Didn’t even offer Chytil for Eichel def not gonna offer him for Dvorak. Lmao


Yah i get that but if they were to trade for Dvorak, it would probably take Chytil which would mean they get a legit center in return. Chytil is not great in the center circle. GEO is just a part of it because Arizona's goalies are on their way out.
2 août 2021 à 22 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 22
You just made the center depth worse...
2 août 2021 à 22 h 33
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: DavidS36
You just made the center depth worse...


how?
3 août 2021 à 11 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: aastorino1993
how?


You went from having a clear 1C (Zibanejad) and 3 3C (Goodrow, Strome, Chytil) quality centers to two 3C (Goodrow and Dvorak). Don't get me wrong I think Rangers trading for Dvorak would be great but if you do make that trade, you don't move Strome until the deadline (depending on playoff contention), have Goodrow center your 4th line and move Chytil to 3RW.

Arizona needs a goalie, the trade should most likely focus around Georgiev instead of a center to replace Dvorak in the Yotes lineup
3 août 2021 à 12 h 27
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: DavidS36
You went from having a clear 1C (Zibanejad) and 3 3C (Goodrow, Strome, Chytil) quality centers to two 3C (Goodrow and Dvorak). Don't get me wrong I think Rangers trading for Dvorak would be great but if you do make that trade, you don't move Strome until the deadline (depending on playoff contention), have Goodrow center your 4th line and move Chytil to 3RW.

Arizona needs a goalie, the trade should most likely focus around Georgiev instead of a center to replace Dvorak in the Yotes lineup


I agree that Goodrow and Dvorak are 3C's on a Center Depth team (like Tampa, just using them since Goodrow was a 3C there). If the Rangers wait till the deadline to get rid of him, they may not get what they want for him because its a cap dump? But it could be right and go the other way that a team over prices him and spends more to get him. I would rather sell him now while his potential is there because if he doesn't have a great season, then getting rid of him can be an issue.
3 août 2021 à 12 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: aastorino1993
I agree that Goodrow and Dvorak are 3C's on a Center Depth team (like Tampa, just using them since Goodrow was a 3C there). If the Rangers wait till the deadline to get rid of him, they may not get what they want for him because its a cap dump? But it could be right and go the other way that a team over prices him and spends more to get him. I would rather sell him now while his potential is there because if he doesn't have a great season, then getting rid of him can be an issue.


Goodrow wasn't the 3C on Tampa, Gourde was. Goodrow played the 3LW in Tampa but can also play center... A Strome deal at the deadline would NOT be a cap dump. Strome will be UFA at the end of this upcoming season a trade at the deadline would be selling him off at the price of a rental. There is no reason to sell on him now unless you are using him to get a objectively better center to play 2C. Worse possible outcome is you hold onto him try to make a playoff run and lose him for nothing in free agency.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 44
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 246
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: DavidS36
Goodrow wasn't the 3C on Tampa, Gourde was. Goodrow played the 3LW in Tampa but can also play center... A Strome deal at the deadline would NOT be a cap dump. Strome will be UFA at the end of this upcoming season a trade at the deadline would be selling him off at the price of a rental. There is no reason to sell on him now unless you are using him to get a objectively better center to play 2C. Worse possible outcome is you hold onto him try to make a playoff run and lose him for nothing in free agency.


The both of them were 3C's Goodrow took more draws throughout the year. I have proof but its off a website my team and I use for video. Also, I didn't mean to say cap dump, but I am afraid that he will not have a good year or a year up to the standards of how he has been playing and it diminishes his value. This team won't make a playoff run unless the young guys step up big time. The D are super young still so there won't be anything besides a quick exit for this team if they do make playoffs.
3 août 2021 à 19 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: aastorino1993
The both of them were 3C's Goodrow took more draws throughout the year. I have proof but its off a website my team and I use for video. Also, I didn't mean to say cap dump, but I am afraid that he will not have a good year or a year up to the standards of how he has been playing and it diminishes his value. This team won't make a playoff run unless the young guys step up big time. The D are super young still so there won't be anything besides a quick exit for this team if they do make playoffs.


If Strome has a bad year then the Rangers hold onto him and try to resign him for a team-friendly deal. And yes this team is young but I still think they can make a solid push
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage