SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season No Trades Shaw Offseason LTIR

Créé par: Pat_Foley
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 1 août 2021
Publié: 1 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 967 547 $452 439 $3 382 500 $15 532 453 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $ (2 375 000 $$2M2 375 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 août 2021 à 17 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 503
Mentions "j'aime": 105
I think with no trades, you're more than likley going to see Gaudette or Borgstrom get a shot at 3C with TyJo on the wing (or reversed), but I don't see the Hawks trading for Borg and Gaudette and obliterating their development.
1 août 2021 à 17 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,406
Mentions "j'aime": 5,058
Quoting: Orionus
I think with no trades, you're more than likley going to see Gaudette or Borgstrom get a shot at 3C with TyJo on the wing (or reversed), but I don't see the Hawks trading for Borg and Gaudette and obliterating their development.


I agree, but it also seems like those trades were made before stan changed his mind that he wanted to be a contender. I'm operating under the assumption that Toews is going to be a full go, because I think theres no way Stan does all this if he isn't. We just have better options than those two guys if we really want to compete. Guadette can play 4C or wing and Borgstrom can get a year in Rockford with Reichel
1 août 2021 à 18 h 2
#3
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,376
Mentions "j'aime": 4,557
I think we’re gonna trade Dylan Strome but ok
1 août 2021 à 18 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
We gotta stop putting strome on the wing. It just doesn’t work. Trade him or put him at center with Dach at wing.
1 août 2021 à 18 h 48
#5
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: HatterTParty
We gotta stop putting strome on the wing. It just doesn’t work. Trade him or put him at center with Dach at wing.


That's a waste of Dach, in my eyes. If we aren't trading Strome to Seattle for Vince Dunn (still trying to force this into the ether) , then I'd want to see Strome centering a third with Johnson capable to step in and take the draws when needed (spoiler: he will be). I think we should keep Strome, because he's capable of putting up good numbers when he's on. How do we ensure he's on?

Put Debrincat on his left. Strome is at his best with Cat on his line, so I'd like to see a line of CAT-STROME-TJ, which conveniently turns that top line into HAGEL-DACH-KANE. Hagel has proven himself useful in just about every situation, he's more than capable of getting to the dirty spots and taking finesse from 77 & 88 to get it in the net. Puts three legitimately threatening lines out there, and that = sexy time.
1 août 2021 à 21 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: JackBurton
That's a waste of Dach, in my eyes. If we aren't trading Strome to Seattle for Vince Dunn (still trying to force this into the ether) , then I'd want to see Strome centering a third with Johnson capable to step in and take the draws when needed (spoiler: he will be). I think we should keep Strome, because he's capable of putting up good numbers when he's on. How do we ensure he's on?

Put Debrincat on his left. Strome is at his best with Cat on his line, so I'd like to see a line of CAT-STROME-TJ, which conveniently turns that top line into HAGEL-DACH-KANE. Hagel has proven himself useful in just about every situation, he's more than capable of getting to the dirty spots and taking finesse from 77 & 88 to get it in the net. Puts three legitimately threatening lines out there, and that = sexy time.


Problem from my perspective is that Dach is just not a center. Pure and simple. He can’t take faceoffs and he’s too indirect in his playing style to be an effective center. The latter will most likely come with time. But at wing he could be extremely effective given his size. Now I’ll admit for a guy his size he IS NOT a power forward. He doesn’t hit and really doesn’t appear to have that desire. How Dach does now means very little to me though. When Kane is actually gone, then we’ll see if Dach is for real. It’s been a very polarizing first two years as is.

I agree that strome is best with cat, but I also would rather have Kane with them too. It’s pure magic when they are each feeding off each other. Dach is a long term defensive center in my eyes anyway. He doesn’t shoot and his passing still has a little fine tuning to go. His vision is good but his defensive is very good for his age. Dach just hasn’t earned top line time yet. I don’t want that forced either. Put Johnson with Dach and Hagel with kurashev with toews and kuba, and that’s assuming you go the Dach at center route. Still three very solid lines, especially if people are as high on Dach as they act like. Let’s see him make some others better instead of others making him better.
1 août 2021 à 22 h 17
#7
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: HatterTParty
Problem from my perspective is that Dach is just not a center. Pure and simple. He can’t take faceoffs and he’s too indirect in his playing style to be an effective center. The latter will most likely come with time. But at wing he could be extremely effective given his size. Now I’ll admit for a guy his size he IS NOT a power forward. He doesn’t hit and really doesn’t appear to have that desire. How Dach does now means very little to me though. When Kane is actually gone, then we’ll see if Dach is for real. It’s been a very polarizing first two years as is.

I agree that strome is best with cat, but I also would rather have Kane with them too. It’s pure magic when they are each feeding off each other. Dach is a long term defensive center in my eyes anyway. He doesn’t shoot and his passing still has a little fine tuning to go. His vision is good but his defensive is very good for his age. Dach just hasn’t earned top line time yet. I don’t want that forced either. Put Johnson with Dach and Hagel with kurashev with toews and kuba, and that’s assuming you go the Dach at center route. Still three very solid lines, especially if people are as high on Dach as they act like. Let’s see him make some others better instead of others making him better.


Dach's future is down the center, putting him at wing only hampers his ability to learn on the job in the role he has to grow into. He hasn't played enough pro games for us to be polarized by his time in Chicago so far, he needs more. His job isn't going to be top line center until Toews is gone, and that ma not be for awhile yet. Who knows. So let's stop worrying about that top line vs 2nd line center stuff.

I just happen to disagree with you on the lines, because I remember how much of a disaster the CAT-DACH-KANE line was in their own zone. Sure they were magic in the offensive zone, but how often were they actually there? They got hemmed in constantly and bad **** happened, and having a disastrous blue line only made it worse.

Maybe now with a better D group, that changes. But for now, I will still reflexively grimace when I see CAT-DACH-KANE hop over the boards.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage