SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline 2017

Créé par: lesage_b4343
Équipe: 2016-17 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 22 févr. 2017
Publié: 22 févr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Desharnais, David
  2. McCarron, Michael
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
conditional 2nd if Hanzal resigns with Montreal
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (MIN)
3.
DET
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
4.
CAR
  1. Gallagher, Brendan
  2. Plekanec, Tomas
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (CHI)
5.
NSH
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2017 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
2018
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $66 041 184 $0 $257 500 $6 958 816 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
839 166 $839 166 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 982 375 $2 982 375 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 10
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 févr. 2017 à 13 h 35
#1
Herms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 125
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Please!!! Don't bring back Vanek hahaha
22 févr. 2017 à 13 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: herms
Please!!! Don't bring back Vanek hahaha


haha he was actually a really solid player in Montreal - 15 points in 18 games (10 in 17 in playoffs) and he really was only not signed due to his high price. I'd bring him into the top six for a couple picks in a heartbeat, we need that kind of depth. Although center is the real glaring spot, Hanzal helps alot and Riberio is a risk but with his production it'd be worth it IMO.
22 févr. 2017 à 13 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,601
Mentions "j'aime": 6,738
Quoting: lesage_b4343
Quoting: herms
Please!!! Don't bring back Vanek hahaha


haha he was actually a really solid player in Montreal - 15 points in 18 games (10 in 17 in playoffs) and he really was only not signed due to his high price. I'd bring him into the top six for a couple picks in a heartbeat, we need that kind of depth. Although center is the real glaring spot, Hanzal helps alot and Riberio is a risk but with his production it'd be worth it IMO.


Ehh, I could find it If I really needed to but I'm almost certain Bergevin said he wasn't resigning Vanek way before he hit free agency that year. Also there were numerous reports that he his first choice was to sign with Minnesota before anyone else.

No one doubts Vaneks talent. Its his CHaracter that is in question. I'd happily take him on for a playoff run if the price isn't too high however.
23 févr. 2017 à 12 h 31
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 4
F50marco
And the same will certainly be said about Riberio but at the end of the day when you need scoring touch those two (vanek/riberio) offer it to the team. You're probable right about not resigning Vanek but if he were available for 3-3.5 at a short term I'd probable do it if I'm Montreal. He's a tertiary signing after we lock up the likes of Galchenyuk/Radulov.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage