SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mr. Murray's Wild Ride

Créé par: atomsapple
Équipe: 2016-17 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2017
Publié: 15 févr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
See comment section for explanation.
Transactions
1.
2.
ANA
  1. Hanzal, Martin (1 550 000 $ retained)
  2. Vrbata, Radim
ARI
  1. Despres, Simon
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $67 093 595 $0 $3 100 000 $5 906 405 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
2 504 887 $2 504 887 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
0 $0 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 250 000 $$2M)
AD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
724 500 $724 500 $
C
UFA - 1
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 856 708 $2 856 708 $
DG
UFA - 6
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. 2017 à 0 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 0
These two trades check all the boxes for the Ducks.

Palat gives the Ducks a proper LW for the Getzlaf line. Palat can play the cycle, the forecheck, and score.

Vrbata and Hanzal as pure rentals give the Ducks stability and scoring depth. Rakell can play LW on a line with those two, shifting Ritchie and Vermette to the 4th line. The Ducks would have 3 of the top 10 FO% in the league in Vermette, Kesler, and Hanzal. The Ducks also rid themselves of Despres' contract. If the Coyotes have interest in re-signing Vrbata and/or Hanzal, these two are UFAs this summer.

If Coyotes trade is too lopsided, can add to Ducks side. Also toying with finding a taker for Thompson to open up additional cap space. Cramarossa can provide C depth, with Garbutt finding his way back onto the bench from San Diego.

As far as the expansion draft, with Bieksa waiving his NMC, Stoner and Bieksa are exposed, protecting Lindholm, Fowler, and Manson. Perry, Getzlaf, Kesler, Rakell, Silfverberg, and Cogliano are protected, with Vermette and Boll exposed. Possibility of Cramarossa and/or Shaw being exposed if signed to extensions during season.
16 févr. 2017 à 0 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I like them
16 févr. 2017 à 1 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 12
The reported asking price for Hanzal is around a first round pick. So with the fact that Despres may not play again and his contract would be more of a dump, and that Hanzal alone is asking a first, you're not giving Arizona anywhere near enough. I think the price is too high for Hanzal, personally, but that's what TDL Deals are like, if you'll remember what they got for Vermette just a few years ago and Yandle as well. Also, with the fact that they'd be retaining salary the price would also increase as well. They'd probably want someone like Jones or Steel to make that deal go through, along with the first round pick, and honestly I'm still not sure they'd stop at that.
16 févr. 2017 à 1 h 55
#4
Go Bolts!!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 153
I don't see the Lightning trading Ondrej Palat - he is the best two way player the Bolts have plus he is LW which the Bolts are short on. The Bolts have tons of center depth so if one of Drouin, Palat or Johnson is traded it will be Tyler Johnson.

Would you do Johnson for Vatanen? I am not sold on Vatanen seems to be struggling this year but he is a major upgrade for the Bolts because once you get past Hedman and Stralman its a crapshoot.
16 févr. 2017 à 8 h 13
#5
Go Ducks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 107
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I think the trades have a good base to them, but could use some tweaking. Maybe look for Killorn over Palat (Johnson would be too much for just Vatanen), and Hanzal is a bit undervalued in your trade, since they are only getting picks, but overall, good ideas!

As far as your lines go, I would like to see Perry and Getzlaf broken up. I think you would get more balanced lines if you switched the wingers for Getzlaf and Hanzal. Lastly, throw in Kase or Shaw over Boll.
16 févr. 2017 à 10 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
I think the trades have a good base to them, but could use some tweaking. Maybe look for Killorn over Palat (Johnson would be too much for just Vatanen), and Hanzal is a bit undervalued in your trade, since they are only getting picks, but overall, good ideas!

As far as your lines go, I would like to see Perry and Getzlaf broken up. I think you would get more balanced lines if you switched the wingers for Getzlaf and Hanzal. Lastly, throw in Kase or Shaw over Boll.


Why would be want Killhorn over Palat? The guy is overpaid and doesn't produce any more than Cogliano (his best season was 41 pts - not that impressive for 4.5M per season). Palat is at least an elite defensive winger who can chip in 45-60 points a season. He'd make an excellent addition to the team IMO.

Quoting: stammerman
I don't see the Lightning trading Ondrej Palat - he is the best two way player the Bolts have plus he is LW which the Bolts are short on. The Bolts have tons of center depth so if one of Drouin, Palat or Johnson is traded it will be Tyler Johnson.

Would you do Johnson for Vatanen? I am not sold on Vatanen seems to be struggling this year but he is a major upgrade for the Bolts because once you get past Hedman and Stralman its a crapshoot.


I'd consider it. Works better with the current line-up IMO.

Rakell - Getzlaf - Perry
Cogliano - Kesler - Silfverberg
Ritchie - Johnson - Kase

I'm just not sure a top 6C on the 3rd line is the best way to counter the loss of Vatanen.
16 févr. 2017 à 11 h 42
#7
Bricks_n_Sticks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 12
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Cool cool
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage