SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

See Yinz after the drafts

Créé par: SpaghettiHead11
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2021
Publié: 11 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Last post till both drafts. Stories vary on Geno's injury from just missing training camp to "hope he's back for the playoffs", so I split the difference. I think that the trades are fair and that this is a pretty balanced team. I'd like a better safety net at G but it is what it is.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 600 000 $
42 000 000 $
21 050 000 $
2875 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2800 000 $
43 250 000 $
42 500 000 $
2750 000 $
2900 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
SEA
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
Détails additionnels:
Expansion pick
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Jankowski, Mark [Droits de RFA]
  2. Larmi, Emil [Droits de RFA]
  3. Lindgren, Jesper [Droits de RFA]
  4. Zucker, Jason (2 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Compensation for taking MP
3.
PIT
  1. Deangelo, Anthony (2 400 000 $ retained)
NYR
  1. Miletic, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Riikola, Juuso
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
4.
PIT
  1. Gaudette, Adam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Airola, Santeri [Liste de réserve]
  2. Zohorna, Radim [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
5.
PIT
  1. Geekie, Morgan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $81 006 364 $0 $212 500 $493 636 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
875 000 $875 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
-1 400 000 $-1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Big pass from canes. Jumping up a few spots isn’t worth Geekie.
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 45
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: vikhodush
Big pass from canes. Jumping up a few spots isn’t worth Geekie.


What would PIT need to add?
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 46
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: SpaghettiHead11
What would PIT need to add?


I mean he’s probably worth 4th straight up but he’s more valuable to the Canes than his fair value in a trade so I can’t see a deal like that happening unless you guys overpaid and gave like a 2nd or something which I know you wouldn’t do
SpaghettiHead11 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 48
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: vikhodush
I mean he’s probably worth 4th straight up but he’s more valuable to the Canes than his fair value in a trade so I can’t see a deal like that happening unless you guys overpaid and gave like a 2nd or something which I know you wouldn’t do


I see him being like Andrew Mangiapane. I was trading for him years ago and I was roasted for it.
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: SpaghettiHead11
I see him being like Andrew Mangiapane. I was trading for him years ago and I was roasted for it.


id love that but idk if his ceiling is quite that high. His type of game and cost is super valuable to the canes tho
SpaghettiHead11 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 52
#6
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Rangers have absolutely zero incentive to retain money on DeAngelo.
Viper15 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2021 à 21 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: aecliptic
Rangers have absolutely zero incentive to retain money on DeAngelo.


NO they don't. They can continue to bury him in the minors and pay his full salary (not talking cap) after the waived him and got no takers. They could buy him out and live with it for 4 more years. Here they at least get some assets and are done after this upcoming season.
11 juill. 2021 à 22 h 7
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
this whole thing is so bad.

No one is paying anything for Deangelo. No one.
"Compensation for taking MP"..............you must be kidding.
Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2021 à 22 h 9
#9
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: SpaghettiHead11
NO they don't. They can continue to bury him in the minors and pay his full salary (not talking cap) after the waived him and got no takers. They could buy him out and live with it for 4 more years. Here they at least get some assets and are done after this upcoming season.


4 years? Do you even know what youre talking about? A buyout would keep him on the books for 2 years, 383k this year, 883k next year.

Thanks for playing. Pick up your participation prize on the way out.
11 juill. 2021 à 22 h 18
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: pharrow
this whole thing is so bad.

No one is paying anything for Deangelo. No one.
"Compensation for taking MP"..............you must be kidding.


I get what you are saying. I have seen most if not all of your posts but I see you always see player for player value. You don't seem to get the cap value of players vs their abilities. That, unfortunately, cap is more important than talent. MP is a high 2m low 3m player but Rutherford signed him high. He then doubled down with Matheson. I'm not saying you are wrong but can a cap strapped team afford to have roughly 13m just on their LD? MP is the loose thread and everyone knows it. PIT is not dealing from a position of strength.
11 juill. 2021 à 22 h 20
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 206
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: aecliptic
4 years? Do you even know what youre talking about? A buyout would keep him on the books for 2 years, 383k this year, 883k next year.

Thanks for playing. Pick up your participation prize on the way out.


My bad on the 4 years. Was looking at several players and mixed them up. Doesn't change the outcome of AD for the NYR's.
12 juill. 2021 à 2 h 18
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: SpaghettiHead11
I get what you are saying. I have seen most if not all of your posts but I see you always see player for player value. You don't seem to get the cap value of players vs their abilities. That, unfortunately, cap is more important than talent. MP is a high 2m low 3m player but Rutherford signed him high. He then doubled down with Matheson. I'm not saying you are wrong but can a cap strapped team afford to have roughly 13m just on their LD? MP is the loose thread and everyone knows it. PIT is not dealing from a position of strength.


they aren't paying anyone to take MP, FFS he would be a 2nd pairing defense man on like 20 teams.
Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2021 à 13 h 45
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 263
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: pharrow
they aren't paying anyone to take MP, FFS he would be a 2nd pairing defense man on like 20 teams.


What he is paying to get rid of Petterson is closer to what they would have to pay to get rid of Matheson. Anyways, he also misses the fact that Larmi is no longer Pens property. He is on his way back to Finland and won't be coming back to NA. Also the Pens would likely have to bribe someone to take Jankowski's rights. The best move with him, is to not qualify him.
12 juill. 2021 à 23 h 58
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Rurik766
What he is paying to get rid of Petterson is closer to what they would have to pay to get rid of Matheson. Anyways, he also misses the fact that Larmi is no longer Pens property. He is on his way back to Finland and won't be coming back to NA. Also the Pens would likely have to bribe someone to take Jankowski's rights. The best move with him, is to not qualify him.


people keep saying this about Matheson, they said the same things about Gudbranson too. It's just not true. There is a sever shortage of defensemen in the league. They would get a return for him, not give something up.......unless it's to seattle, who they would be paying not because of Matheson, but to keep them off other guys like Tanev.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage