SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

complete overhaul

Créé par: pastrnak_is_my_dad
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2021
Publié: 10 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
53 000 000 $
65 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
65 250 000 $
23 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
44 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Kuhlman, Karson
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. Zboril, Jakub
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Garland, Conor [Droits de RFA]
3.
NSH
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
4.
BOS
SEA
  1. Moore, John
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 138 452 $1 956 507 $125 000 $3 361 548 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
This isn't an overhaul. This is you trading complimentary parts for excellent players, robbing every team blind.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 232
Mentions "j'aime": 45
LOL .. so trade all the unwanted failed draft picks for talent? .. all trades here should be made in Fantasy land
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 35
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
This isn't an overhaul. This is you trading complimentary parts for excellent players, robbing every team blind.


which trade is "robbing them blind" I underpaid for Lindholm and Ekholm because they are expiring and likely to walk (the teams still get solid prospects and picks back) and you obviously don't watch or know hockey if you think pieces like Studnika and Vladar are "complimentary pieces"
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: Imback123
LOL .. so trade all the unwanted failed draft picks for talent? .. all trades here should be made in Fantasy land


which trade would any of these teams decline they are getting solid prospects ie. Studnika,Vladar and Zborjl etc. while all the players either want out and are RFAs or have on year left before walking in FA
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
which trade is "robbing them blind" I underpaid for Lindholm and Ekholm because they are expiring and likely to walk (the teams still get solid prospects and picks back) and you obviously don't watch or know hockey if you think pieces like Studnika and Vladar are "complimentary pieces"


Hi,

Ekholm: Debrusk isn't a prospect. He was drafted 6 years ago. He is an overpaid, underperforming player. They will do much better in an ekholm trade, especially considering his salary.

Anaheim would easily get a 1st plus for Lindholm.

2017 draft picks who haven't made any impact likely arent just going to magically become excellent players. The shine is off these guys, they aren't top prospects when they aren't NHLers entering their draft plus 5 years.

Vladar is ok, but hes still just an AHL goalie.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
which trade would any of these teams decline they are getting solid prospects ie. Studnika,Vladar and Zborjl etc. while all the players either want out and are RFAs or have on year left before walking in FA


those 3 players are entering their draft plus 5, plus 7 and plus 7 seasons. they aren't solid prospects!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Hi,

Ekholm: Debrusk isn't a prospect. He was drafted 6 years ago. He is an overpaid, underperforming player. They will do much better in an ekholm trade, especially considering his salary.

Anaheim would easily get a 1st plus for Lindholm.

2017 draft picks who haven't made any impact likely arent just going to magically become excellent players. The shine is off these guys, they aren't top prospects when they aren't NHLers entering their draft plus 5 years.

Vladar is ok, but hes still just an AHL goalie.


Ekholm: DeBrusk went through Covid and horrible personal stuff and will bounce back and NSH gets a mid first round pick for a guy who was gunna walk anyway.
Lindhom: Zborjl and Vak are still considered solid defensive prospects by the majority of people. They also get Kulman who should be a good 3rd line RW in the future as well as a 2nd and 3rd.
Garland: Studnika is considered a future 2C Vladar has very solid potential and Kase is great when healthy.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 46
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
Ekholm: DeBrusk went through Covid and horrible personal stuff and will bounce back and NSH gets a mid first round pick for a guy who was gunna walk anyway.
Lindhom: Zborjl and Vak are still considered solid defensive prospects by the majority of people. They also get Kulman who should be a good 3rd line RW in the future as well as a 2nd and 3rd.
Garland: Studnika is considered a future 2C Vladar has very solid potential and Kase is great when healthy.


People drafted in 2015 are not prospects in 2021.
Kase has a 2.6 million Qualifying offer and is never healthy
Studnicka is entering his 5th year since being drafted and isn't a full time NHL player yet. The idea that he is a 2C is far fetched.

These are awful trades and you seem to forget that there are 30 other teams in the NHL who can offer better trades. The idea that Nashville has to trade Ekholm to Boston for that or lose him for free is misguided. Also, debrusk will need a new contract and will have arbitration rights and a high qualifying offer. Its just not good.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 9 h 52
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
People drafted in 2015 are not prospects in 2021.
Kase has a 2.6 million Qualifying offer and is never healthy
Studnicka is entering his 5th year since being drafted and isn't a full time NHL player yet. The idea that he is a 2C is far fetched.

These are awful trades and you seem to forget that there are 30 other teams in the NHL who can offer better trades. The idea that Nashville has to trade Ekholm to Boston for that or lose him for free is misguided. Also, debrusk will need a new contract and will have arbitration rights and a high qualifying offer. Its just not good.


Studnika has been roughly a PPG in the AHL and had a bad nhl year because he was put on the RW with a struggling Coyle and DeBrusk. Kase will not take his QO and is roughly looking for 1mil for 1 year as a prove it deal. Vak And Zborjl have good value and there have been talks of Seattle wanting Zborjl instead of Lauzon. And again DeBrusk is going to bounce back for reasons I stated earlier. I have also used and seen these exact trades used with no problem at all. All these have fair value you can't tell me otherwise.
10 juill. 2021 à 10 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 941
Mentions "j'aime": 606
I think you're definitely in the ballpark for Garland.

Ekholm is definitely a discount but not super brutal as he's a rental (but probably still a small piece light as this gets outbid).

The Lindholm deal doesn't work mainly because it is far too easy to outbid. I wouldn't call Vaakanainen an A or A+ piece anymore so there no centerpiece for that deal.

Like what you were trying to do though. Would love to see it happen.
pastrnak_is_my_dad a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2021 à 10 h 26
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 217
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Preds reject that trade
10 juill. 2021 à 22 h 54
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: dcavery1972
Preds reject that trade


lmao no
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage