SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff Push

Créé par: KPasty
Équipe: 2016-17 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2017
Publié: 6 févr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Calgary gets a goalie at a relatively inexpensive price. Pittsburgh gets a solid veteran netminder for the playoffs.

Sharp can be that veteran guy who can slot from line 1-3 and has the experience of 3 cups. His value based off this year should be relatively low. Pouliot and a pair of 3rd round picks should do it I would think. Dallas could use the defensive prospect.

Finally seidenberg is a dirt cheap option for a future 3rd round pick and another prospect in Percy.

Is this good value? And do you think this helps Pittsburgh in the playoffs?
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Elliott, Brian
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (CGY)
2.
PIT
  1. Sharp, Patrick (2 250 000 $ retained)
DAL
  1. Pouliot, Derrick
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (CGY)
3.
NYI
  1. Percy, Stuart
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2017 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2018
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $69 616 975 $0 $772 500 $3 383 025 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
667 500 $667 500 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 9
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
640 000 $640 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
625 000 $625 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 6
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
628 333 $628 333 $ (Bonis de performance257 500 $$258K)
G
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 févr. 2017 à 14 h 7
#1
IslesFan9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 326
Mentions "j'aime": 53
You could probably get Seidenberg for some signed Crosby pucks. As an Islanders fan that is a gross overpay. A 5th probably does it.
6 févr. 2017 à 14 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
like everything but the seidenberg trade, make it a fifth. other then that, very good team. (lines need some work)
6 févr. 2017 à 14 h 13
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,162
Mentions "j'aime": 366
Change made, wasn't exactly sure on his value. Hard to judge sometimes when it's picks.
6 févr. 2017 à 16 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Moving Fleury won't be this easy . Why would the Flames want a 32 years old mediocre goalie who has posted 90.6 save % behind one of the best teams in the league, on a hefty cap hit signed for 2 more years AND on top of that send a 3rd rounder to the Pens. He's not even an upgrade over Elliott. Pens would have to be the team to add for this to work. Flames have all the leverage. It's not like anyone is licking their chops trying to get their hands on Fleury. It would be more like one of those "we'll i guess we could see what he can do" type of situations if you add something valuable to make it worth their while to give Fleury a shot.
7 févr. 2017 à 8 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 5
I do not agree with Sharp or Seidenberg. Sharp would be a rental and pouliot plus 2 thirds is a no go. Also, Seidenberg is being paid 4M a year and has one more after this. That would be wasting the cap space we would get in Fleury and have no use for him when we have 6 + capable defenseman.
7 févr. 2017 à 12 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: Blunder
Moving Fleury won't be this easy . Why would the Flames want a 32 years old mediocre goalie who has posted 90.6 save % behind one of the best teams in the league, on a hefty cap hit signed for 2 more years AND on top of that send a 3rd rounder to the Pens. He's not even an upgrade over Elliott. Pens would have to be the team to add for this to work. Flames have all the leverage. It's not like anyone is licking their chops trying to get their hands on Fleury. It would be more like one of those "we'll i guess we could see what he can do" type of situations if you add something valuable to make it worth their while to give Fleury a shot.


So wrong it hurts
7 févr. 2017 à 13 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Quoting: mhockey91
Quoting: Blunder
Moving Fleury won't be this easy . Why would the Flames want a 32 years old mediocre goalie who has posted 90.6 save % behind one of the best teams in the league, on a hefty cap hit signed for 2 more years AND on top of that send a 3rd rounder to the Pens. He's not even an upgrade over Elliott. Pens would have to be the team to add for this to work. Flames have all the leverage. It's not like anyone is licking their chops trying to get their hands on Fleury. It would be more like one of those "we'll i guess we could see what he can do" type of situations if you add something valuable to make it worth their while to give Fleury a shot.


So wrong it hurts


He's not tho. I'm a Pens fan, and even I see that Fleury has next to no trade value right now. I think he can be moved, but we can't be expecting to get any kind of high picks or retained salary when trading him. It will likely be player for player if it is done, maybe some lower round picks or slight draft movement involved.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage