SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

McJesus Support

Créé par: MauriceArthur15
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2021
Publié: 2 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
66 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
24 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
    Expansion draft
    2.
    EDM
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
    CHI
    1. Neal, James
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2023
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $78 707 172 $669 339 $2 157 500 $2 792 828 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    785 000 $785 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    2 juill. 2021 à 2 h 29
    #1
    JaceRing
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 22
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Do not give up the 19th overall pick just to dump James Neal. That's too much. Also, I wouldn't give Driedger 5 years, I would give him 3 just because how risky goalies can be. And instead of Savard, just bring back Adam Larsson, who is a very similar player but could sign for almost a million dollars less per year. Glendening isn't a good enough third line center and finally if Holloway is going to be in the lineup, he needs to be playing a significant amount of time. Same thing goes for Broberg, if they aren't going to play (or barely going to play) put them down in Bakersfield where they can play top line minutes.
    2 juill. 2021 à 12 h 20
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    TopDawgReese
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 253
    Quoting: JaceRing
    Do not give up the 19th overall pick just to dump James Neal. That's too much. Also, I wouldn't give Driedger 5 years, I would give him 3 just because how risky goalies can be. And instead of Savard, just bring back Adam Larsson, who is a very similar player but could sign for almost a million dollars less per year. Glendening isn't a good enough third line center and finally if Holloway is going to be in the lineup, he needs to be playing a significant amount of time. Same thing goes for Broberg, if they aren't going to play (or barely going to play) put them down in Bakersfield where they can play top line minutes.


    I can agree with the rest as those are shots in the dark. You can I upgrade certain parts and area as I did leave cap space behind to do so. I disagree with the Neal contract and conception.

    This my reasoning and hopefully it sheds some of my insight as to why I think it’s smart to trade your 1st this year. This years draft is probably the weakest draft since 2012 and has the potential to be even worse than 2012. The quality of prospects just isn’t there and the projection of top end talent is there. Unless the plan is to take a goalie at 19 which is reach as Sebastian Cossa is more of later 1st rounder and would be a reach at 19. That’s just my 2 cents as you’re in a win now mode and it makes zero sense to bank on futures rn when you have 2 top 10 players in the NHL on your roster.
    2 juill. 2021 à 23 h 11
    #3
    JaceRing
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 22
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: MauriceArthur15
    I can agree with the rest as those are shots in the dark. You can I upgrade certain parts and area as I did leave cap space behind to do so. I disagree with the Neal contract and conception.

    This my reasoning and hopefully it sheds some of my insight as to why I think it’s smart to trade your 1st this year. This years draft is probably the weakest draft since 2012 and has the potential to be even worse than 2012. The quality of prospects just isn’t there and the projection of top end talent is there. Unless the plan is to take a goalie at 19 which is reach as Sebastian Cossa is more of later 1st rounder and would be a reach at 19. That’s just my 2 cents as you’re in a win now mode and it makes zero sense to bank on futures rn when you have 2 top 10 players in the NHL on your roster.


    I do want the Oilers to trade their first round pick but only if they can get something valuable in return for it.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage