SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers 2021 Offseason Proving a Point to Haipho

Créé par: younggreybeard
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 30 juin 2021
Publié: 30 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What I hope the Oilers do this offseason. Mainly to prove a point to my friend.

Buyout Koski.
Resign Larsson to $4Mx4.
Sign Oleksiak to $2.5Mx2.
Resign Khaira to $1Mx2.
Sign Ullmark or trade for Kuemper.
Sign Saad to $5Mx3.
Sign Yamamoto to $3Mx2 bridge deal.

Bring up Holloway.
Bring up Benson.
Bring up Broberg for the first 9.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
11 800 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
14 000 000 $
33 500 000 $
35 000 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $73 190 172 $669 339 $2 157 500 $8 309 828 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juin 2021 à 17 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,616
Mentions "j'aime": 748
I think the value of your contracts are a little off and with that much cap room we definitely need to go after a better 3C
younggreybeard et CD282 a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 17 h 58
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Smokingun71
I think the value of your contracts are a little off and with that much cap room we definitely need to go after a better 3C


Yeah probably! I mostly made this to argue with my friend and know literally almost nothing about GM stuff. Any contract in particular you think is off?
30 juin 2021 à 18 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Why didn't you protect Jones in the expansion draft?
younggreybeard a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 18 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CD282
Why didn't you protect Jones in the expansion draft?


I like Jones, but I figured he was a likely candidate for Seattle to take and Nurse&Bear, Larsson&Oleksiak, Russell&Bouchard would be a good d-core to run with. With Lagesson and Broberg (hopefully) coming up I figured we could afford to take the hit on losing Jones.
30 juin 2021 à 18 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: younggreybeard
I like Jones, but I figured he was a likely candidate for Seattle to take and Nurse&Bear, Larsson&Oleksiak, Russell&Bouchard would be a good d-core to run with. With Lagesson and Broberg (hopefully) coming up I figured we could afford to take the hit on losing Jones.


Who did you protect though? I'm not seeing a logical protection plan that leaves out Jones.
younggreybeard a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 18 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CD282
Who did you protect though? I'm not seeing a logical protection plan that leaves out Jones.


Oh! I actually just took it from a projected protected list from Bob Stauffer. Which may or may not have been a bad idea haha.

https://twitter.com/Bob_Stauffer/status/1409525726198472707

Edit: When I say I don't know much about GM stuff I'm being very, very serious.
30 juin 2021 à 19 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: younggreybeard
Oh! I actually just took it from a projected protected list from Bob Stauffer. Which may or may not have been a bad idea haha.

https://twitter.com/Bob_Stauffer/status/1409525726198472707

Edit: When I say I don't know much about GM stuff I'm being very, very serious.


Yeah, as Stauffer points out you could hold off the Larsson signing until July 18 and protect Jones. He's better than Russell IMO and would strengthen your bottom pairing. But if Larsson is signed ahead of the expansion draft then it makes sense to protect him.
younggreybeard a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 19 h 18
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CD282
Yeah, as Stauffer points out you could hold off the Larsson signing until July 18 and protect Jones. He's better than Russell IMO and would strengthen your bottom pairing. But if Larsson is signed ahead of the expansion draft then it makes sense to protect him.


Yeah that's a very good point. It seemed like the organization and the coaching staff had zero faith in Jones last season, which was disappointing to see. So Jones and Bouchard for the 3rd pairing? Would we still sign another D for our second pairing, or run Russell-Larsson? Or would you want Russell to be our 7th d-man?

Thanks for commenting! It seems like you're very knowledgeable and it's cool to get feedback and learn more about armchair gm-ing smile
30 juin 2021 à 21 h 43
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,616
Mentions "j'aime": 748
Quoting: younggreybeard
Yeah probably! I mostly made this to argue with my friend and know literally almost nothing about GM stuff. Any contract in particular you think is off?


I would say that you overpaid Yamamoto and Benson by about 1M each, they have no arbitration rights and will have to take a small bridge deal to prove themselves more. Both Oleksiak and Ullmark are about 500k-1M low. Other then that you did a fairly good job.
younggreybeard a aimé ceci.
30 juin 2021 à 22 h 41
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Smokingun71
I would say that you overpaid Yamamoto and Benson by about 1M each, they have no arbitration rights and will have to take a small bridge deal to prove themselves more. Both Oleksiak and Ullmark are about 500k-1M low. Other then that you did a fairly good job.


That's definitely a fair point! I had a tough time figuring out Yamo's contract as he was so good in his rookie year, but definitely hit a sophomore slump. $2M bridge sounds more likely. Benson as well sounds about right.

Take ~1M from Yamo and Benson, give 1M to Ullmark and Oleksiak. and my mistakes cancel each other out. Thanks for your input and positivity!
2 juill. 2021 à 8 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: younggreybeard
Yeah that's a very good point. It seemed like the organization and the coaching staff had zero faith in Jones last season, which was disappointing to see. So Jones and Bouchard for the 3rd pairing? Would we still sign another D for our second pairing, or run Russell-Larsson? Or would you want Russell to be our 7th d-man?

Thanks for commenting! It seems like you're very knowledgeable and it's cool to get feedback and learn more about armchair gm-ing smile


Yeah, for sure this team needs a 2nd pairing LHD. A short-term solution is fine (1-2 years) as Broberg and Samorukov are pushing for a job this fall and one of them may be ready for a top-4 job as soon as 2022.

Russell should be the 7th man at this point.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage