SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

OEL for Nate Schmidt

Créé par: GarthSnowsShoulderPads
Publié: 10 juin 2021 à 15 h 22
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 186/186 (100%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes ne rencontre pas l'exigence minimale de 24 patineurs

Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaCoyotes de l'Arizona

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Ekman-Larsson, OliverCoyotes de l'ArizonaLNH-8 250 000 $111---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Schmidt, NateCanucks de VancouverLNH-5 950 000 $111---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial31 608 334 $122565124
Variation2 300 000 $000000
Final33 908 334 $ (↑)122565124000

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Schmidt, NateCanucks de VancouverLNH-5 950 000 $111---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Ekman-Larsson, OliverCoyotes de l'ArizonaLNH-8 250 000 $111---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial14 980 621 $162362124
Variation-2 300 000 $000000
Final12 680 621 $ (↓)162362124000
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 27
#1
They were really big
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Revisting the Canucks interest in OEL last off-season... Not saying it's a great fit for Vancouver, but GMJB seems stubborn.

Arizona gets out from under OEL's contract—and the 10.5m/10.5m/10.5m in salary due in each of the next three seasons. They replace him with Nate Schmidt who can carry the same minutes at only 6.0m/6.0m/5.0m for the next three seasons.

Both players are the same age. Schmidt has four years left on his contract. OEL has six years.

Vancouver gets arguably the better player, but they will pay much more salary over the contract term, and assume the greater long-term cap risk.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 48
#2
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: GarthSnowsShoulderPads
Revisting the Canucks interest in OEL last off-season... Not saying it's a great fit for Vancouver, but GMJB seems stubborn.

Arizona gets out from under OEL's contract—and the 10.5m/10.5m/10.5m in salary due in each of the next three seasons. They replace him with Nate Schmidt who can carry the same minutes at only 6.0m/6.0m/5.0m for the next three seasons.

Both players are the same age. Schmidt has four years left on his contract. OEL has six years.

Vancouver gets arguably the better player, but they will pay much more salary over the contract term, and assume the greater long-term cap risk.


we get the worse defensive player on a bad defensive team.

We don't want his contract or his play and we happily pass.
Rhea et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 16 h 6
#3
Démarrer sujet
They were really big
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: reelkena
we get the worse defensive player on a bad defensive team.

We don't want his contract or his play and we happily pass.


I think there is some decent redemption value in OEL with Brad Shaw coming onboard. He’s done very well working with other top-pairing defensemen like Pieterangelo, Jones, and Werenski.

His cap hit is high, but the Canucks are only in a cap-crunch next season before their skies clear. His cap-hit is only $1-2mm more than what his UFA market value may be. Considering how hard it is to acquire defensemen of his profile it may be worth the cap hit given the potentially low acquisition cost.
10 juin 2021 à 16 h 26
#4
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 2,084
Quoting: GarthSnowsShoulderPads
I think there is some decent redemption value in OEL with Brad Shaw coming onboard. He’s done very well working with other top-pairing defensemen like Pieterangelo, Jones, and Werenski.

His cap hit is high, but the Canucks are only in a cap-crunch next season before their skies clear. His cap-hit is only $1-2mm more than what his UFA market value may be. Considering how hard it is to acquire defensemen of his profile it may be worth the cap hit given the potentially low acquisition cost.


if we were interested in that redemption value then we would wait a year until we could afford it. I know we can sign Quinn and Elias but we have no extra room.

Personally I would pass for all eternity on OEL but even if that wasn't the case it wouldn't be this offseason.
10 juin 2021 à 16 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 829
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Toss in the Canucks #2 and the Hawks #5 and the deal would be worthwhile for Arizona.
10 juin 2021 à 20 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Toss in a 2nd and 3rd and this would be good for both sides even though OEL has a big contract, he is more worth his money than Nate and a change of scenery will help him I think.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage