SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Opening Roster

Créé par: qazzwy1
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2021
Publié: 5 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Jim tries to save his job.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 500 000 $
37 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
1875 000 $
1875 000 $
66 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
ANA
  1. Virtanen, Jake
Détails additionnels:
Contract Termination
2.
VAN
    Expansion Draft
    SEA
    1. Holtby, Braden
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
    3.
    VAN
    1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
    BUF
    1. Lind, Kole
    2. Persson, Viktor [Liste de réserve]
    3. Schmidt, Nate
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
    Détails additionnels:
    Jim is aggressive and trades his 1st next season plus a prospect to acquire another top forward
    4.
    TBL
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
    Détails additionnels:
    Take advantage of a team that can't protect all their dmen.
    Rachats de contrats
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2023
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $80 008 993 $648 780 $1 900 000 $1 491 007 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $$5M4 875 000 $$5M)
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    783 333 $783 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 juin 2021 à 0 h 8
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 5,062
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
    Doubt Francis wants to lose his job helping Jim save his.

    The TB dmen Van would have their choice of is McDonagh and Rutta...
    TheThunder a aimé ceci.
    5 juin 2021 à 0 h 13
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 22
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: Riley816
    Doubt Francis wants to lose his job helping Jim save his.

    The TB dmen Van would have their choice of is McDonagh and Rutta...


    I am pretty sure Tampa has to protect McDonagh. They may have to give Seattle a pick or trade one of Cal Foote or Cernak
    5 juin 2021 à 0 h 42
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 4,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
    Modifié 5 juin 2021 à 0 h 49
    Quoting: qazzwy1
    I am pretty sure Tampa has to protect McDonagh. They may have to give Seattle a pick or trade one of Cal Foote or Cernak


    They don't have to protect McDonagh. The might lose Foote.

    Also, the logic "don't wanna lose them for nothing/cheap" doesn't really hold water because now (in this scenario) not only is Tampa down a player they lost for nothing they're down a player the lost well below value.

    So team with multiple good assets available to Seattle are probably more likely to just take the hit and only lose one player from their lineup.
    Riley816 a aimé ceci.
    5 juin 2021 à 2 h 50
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 3,618
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
    Quoting: Rangsey
    They don't have to protect McDonagh. The might lose Foote.

    Also, the logic "don't wanna lose them for nothing/cheap" doesn't really hold water because now (in this scenario) not only is Tampa down a player they lost for nothing they're down a player the lost well below value.

    So team with multiple good assets available to Seattle are probably more likely to just take the hit and only lose one player from their lineup.


    Ya it really only makes sense to trade a player rather than lose them for nothing if there is a huge dropoff from that player and the next player that would be taken.

    For example: (for the sake of this example let's pretend Logan Stanley wasn't eligible) Winnipeg would protect Morrisey, Demelo, Pionk, Schiefle, Ehlers, Dubois, Wheeler, Lowry, Copp, Connor.

    This would leave Appleton exposed. The next best player would be like Nathan Beaulieu maybe? In a situation like that it would make sense to move Appleton for assets.

    Now of course Stanley is eligible so this wouldn't make sense in reality as then they lose both Appleton and Stanley
    Rangsey et BadBadgers a aimé ceci.
    5 juin 2021 à 4 h 15
    #5
    PULL A TAMPA IGNORE
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 2,563
    Mentions "j'aime": 690
    No Chance Cernak is available Mcdonagh is definitely not protected even going 4x4 Foote is protected over Mcdonagh.
    Mcdonagh only has a NTC not NMC so they aren't required to protect him
    5 juin 2021 à 7 h 52
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 4,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
    Quoting: Mediumyeet
    Ya it really only makes sense to trade a player rather than lose them for nothing if there is a huge dropoff from that player and the next player that would be taken.

    For example: (for the sake of this example let's pretend Logan Stanley wasn't eligible) Winnipeg would protect Morrisey, Demelo, Pionk, Schiefle, Ehlers, Dubois, Wheeler, Lowry, Copp, Connor.

    This would leave Appleton exposed. The next best player would be like Nathan Beaulieu maybe? In a situation like that it would make sense to move Appleton for assets.

    Now of course Stanley is eligible so this wouldn't make sense in reality as then they lose both Appleton and Stanley


    If Minnesota trade Dumba they can protect their entire core group. They're really the only example I can think of.
    BadBadgers et Mediumyeet a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage