SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not the leafs

Créé par: Ragsandbluesfan
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 31 mai 2021
Publié: 1 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
37 500 000 $
47 500 000 $
1874 125 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
2750 000 $
35 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $73 174 784 $648 780 $1 900 000 $8 325 216 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $$5M4 875 000 $$5M)
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juin 2021 à 0 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Hey man! Nice trades!
Hockey_Soul a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 0 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 4,003
I would rather Schmidt on his contract than Savard and Robinson as replacements. Robinson was elevated by Tortz and I doubt many other coaches would see him as much more than a 4th liner. The trade alone is a CBJ fleece.

I also think moving Holl is a rash decision for Toronto and that we aren't paying them enough.

Signing Bozak would be a nice add though
Hockey_Soul et MirandaGemini a aimé ceci.
1 juin 2021 à 0 h 52
#3
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,915
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
CBJ is all over that deal. Seems heavily lopsided to me.
1 juin 2021 à 0 h 59
#4
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Wqrrior
I would rather Schmidt on his contract than Savard and Robinson as replacements. Robinson was elevated by Tortz and I doubt many other coaches would see him as much more than a 4th liner. The trade alone is a CBJ fleece.

I also think moving Holl is a rash decision for Toronto and that we aren't paying them enough.

Signing Bozak would be a nice add though


Quoting: Hockey_Mind
CBJ is all over that deal. Seems heavily lopsided to me.


I would have taken the lightning 1st but that seemed to favor vancouver a bit much for me
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 0
#5
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,915
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
I would have taken the lightning 1st but that seemed to favor vancouver a bit much for me


A first is too much, but maybe a 3rd or a 2nd depending on what the return for Jones is.
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Modifié 1 juin 2021 à 1 h 7
Quoting: Hockey_Mind
A first is too much, but maybe a 3rd or a 2nd depending on what the return for Jones is.


You don't have a 2021 2nd and I doubt they'd want to move another one, and tampas pick will be 27, 29-32 anyway
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 4,003
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
I would have taken the lightning 1st but that seemed to favor vancouver a bit much for me


Savard has gotten overrated a fair bit this year, and management overrates him too. He's one of the slowest guys on the ice - and although I like his fit here, I think Schmidt will have more long term impact. They are different defensemen so it's hard to compare, but I'm saying I would rather keep what we have than go this route because I think Robinson is just another one of what we already have plenty of.
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 23
#8
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Wqrrior
Savard has gotten overrated a fair bit this year, and management overrates him too. He's one of the slowest guys on the ice - and although I like his fit here, I think Schmidt will have more long term impact. They are different defensemen so it's hard to compare, but I'm saying I would rather keep what we have than go this route because I think Robinson is just another one of what we already have plenty of.


Hes motte-like but I love those guys
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 25
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 4,003
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Hes motte-like but I love those guys


I love them too, but we already have 5 of them (Motte, Roussel, Hawryluk, Highmore, Gadjovich). Teams should only have one or two. This is part of why our bottom six is perhaps the worst in the league.

Getting a NHL level 3rd line has got to be #1 priority.
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 27
#10
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Wqrrior
I love them too, but we already have 5 of them (Motte, Roussel, Hawryluk, Highmore, Gadjovich). Teams should only have one or two. This is part of why our bottom six is perhaps the worst in the league.

Getting a NHL level 3rd line has got to be #1 priority.


Bozak and Podkolzin are 2 right there, I've never been comfortbale with Pearson in the top 6 but hes been paid so you can't go back anymore
1 juin 2021 à 1 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 4,003
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Bozak and Podkolzin are 2 right there, I've never been comfortbale with Pearson in the top 6 but hes been paid so you can't go back anymore


Pearson is a transitional piece. When he's on his game, he's definitely a 2nd line player. His issue is consistency. He was one of the better canuck forwards after returning from the pause but was also a bit invisible before it.

He allows Hoglander and Podkolzin to find their roles before rushing them to top 6 minutes. After they do, he makes for one of the best third liners we have had in a while. I'm comfortable with the contract and think its better than most people say.

Podkolzin is the direct Toffoli hole replacement. I think we still need two third line pieces: Bozak as one, and perhaps one other. My main target the last while has been Jason Dickinson. I would also be happy with Tierney or Barbashev. Then the fourth line can focus on being a fourth line as opposed to a 3rd line B line.
1 juin 2021 à 9 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,174
Quoting: Rixy17
Hey man! Nice trades!


i also like your post nice balance and cap room plus our picks. good read.
1 juin 2021 à 11 h 0
#13
Démarrer sujet
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Quoting: Wqrrior
Pearson is a transitional piece. When he's on his game, he's definitely a 2nd line player. His issue is consistency. He was one of the better canuck forwards after returning from the pause but was also a bit invisible before it.

He allows Hoglander and Podkolzin to find their roles before rushing them to top 6 minutes. After they do, he makes for one of the best third liners we have had in a while. I'm comfortable with the contract and think its better than most people say.

Podkolzin is the direct Toffoli hole replacement. I think we still need two third line pieces: Bozak as one, and perhaps one other. My main target the last while has been Jason Dickinson. I would also be happy with Tierney or Barbashev. Then the fourth line can focus on being a fourth line as opposed to a 3rd line B line.


Barbashev could be good for Pod, maybe Sanford for some physicality?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage