SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

In The Event Of A Playoff Failure

Créé par: CWGS
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 mai 2021
Publié: 26 mai 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
As Leafs fans, we're conditioned to assume the worst, always. So, this is what I came up with/thought could be considered this offseason if the Leafs catastrophically fail to reach their goals in the playoffs. *knock on wood*

I'm curious for your takes as well. If the Leafs blow it, what do you think is the most likely outcome? Who is most at risk of getting moved and what is the return? Do you think deals like what I came up with would make sense or do you see something else being more likely and enticing for the Leafs?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 750 000 $
1750 000 $
22 500 000 $
1750 000 $
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Marner, Mitchell
Détails additionnels:
By no means do I think this would be anywhere close to 1 for 1, but in the event of a catastrophic outcome for the Leafs, the player they move is Marner to really reset the locker room. With the Flames also likely looking at a retool, Tkachuk (while unlikely to be moved) could be someone who really creates some change, and getting someone like Marner is tough to say no to.
2.
VAN
  1. Amirov, Rodion
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Rielly, Morgan
Détails additionnels:
Again, while this trade isn't particularly close and would need a lot of work, trading a guy like Reilly would be a massive culture change for the Leafs and using these kinds of assets (while taking on money and an unhappy player in Schmidt) could be really beneficial to the Leafs, even if they have to give up Amirov to do it.
3.
TOR
SEA
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Engvall, Pierre
Détails additionnels:
Who cares what pick it is, but it's a pick.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 151 783 $0 $400 000 $348 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
825 000 $825 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mai 2021 à 2 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,931
Mentions "j'aime": 19,960
If not a 1 for 1 what do you think it would be because Flames probably wont be adding more than a 3rd at most. Calgary already has a soft perimeter winger in Gaudreau
26 mai 2021 à 5 h 11
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,435
Mentions "j'aime": 10,744
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
If not a 1 for 1 what do you think it would be because Flames probably wont be adding more than a 3rd at most. Calgary already has a soft perimeter winger in Gaudreau


And doesn't Marner make a AVG of 10+ a year
26 mai 2021 à 5 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,931
Mentions "j'aime": 19,960
Quoting: Gmonwy
And doesn't Marner make a AVG of 10+ a year


just shy of 11 actually
26 mai 2021 à 7 h 33
#4
Hockey Expert
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 256
Mentions "j'aime": 47
If we have a major failure this postseason I believe Rielly is the first to go. He is not as much of an offensive threat as he was a few years ago and his defensive play can be horendous at times. As for the big 4, if anyone should go I think it should be Marner. He has a large cap hit, high trade value and he just never performs in the playoffs the way we need him to.
CWGS a aimé ceci.
26 mai 2021 à 7 h 38
#5
Zach Johnston
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 27
Damn would it be weird to see Marner in Calgary.
26 mai 2021 à 7 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,355
Mentions "j'aime": 136
You would really piss of AM34 if you moved Marner too. They love playing together. I don't think Marner is the one to go he is a complete player. Look at him on the penalty kill and in the last few minutes of each game throwing his body on the line as a PPG player.
26 mai 2021 à 10 h 39
#7
Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 583
Mentions "j'aime": 254
Canucks decline. Boeser is basically untouchable for us
26 mai 2021 à 12 h 46
#8
Démarrer sujet
Connor
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
If not a 1 for 1 what do you think it would be because Flames probably wont be adding more than a 3rd at most. Calgary already has a soft perimeter winger in Gaudreau


I just don't think it would be 1 for 1 because of the salaries, and the fact that Tkachuk is expiring relatively soon with a high QO. I don't know what would need to be added, but I think 1 for 1 just doesn't make a ton of sense for either team.
26 mai 2021 à 12 h 49
#9
Démarrer sujet
Connor
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: BadBadgers
Canucks decline. Boeser is basically untouchable for us


Again, I don't think these are perfectly fair trades, but something along those lines is what I was thinking. I also wouldn't rule out Boeser given last offseason's rumours and his cap hit. You also have Jim Benning as a GM, so I don't think you can rule anything out and getting a BC boy in Reilly could be very enticing for him. Oh, and you get a Boeser replacement in Amirov for a couple of years down the road in the trade.
26 mai 2021 à 12 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,931
Mentions "j'aime": 19,960
Quoting: CWGS
I just don't think it would be 1 for 1 because of the salaries, and the fact that Tkachuk is expiring relatively soon with a high QO. I don't know what would need to be added, but I think 1 for 1 just doesn't make a ton of sense for either team.


His "high QO" is still nearly 2M less than Marner for similar caliber players
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage