SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Laine off-season is this playoff team

Créé par: RC333
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2021
Publié: 16 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
How does this team do?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
11 000 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
35 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
37 000 000 $
46 900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Laine, Patrik [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Roussel, Antoine
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Using mantha as a comparable
1st = vrana
1st= 1st
2nd = 2nd
+ Capdump
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 400 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $3 099 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 900 000 $6 900 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 875 000 $$5M4 875 000 $$5M)
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
786 111 $786 111 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 11
#1
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Using "comparables" for trades makes close to no sense...every trade is different. VAN is in no position to be giving up 1st rounders (especially not 2), WSH is.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 31
#2
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: redw1n9s
Using "comparables" for trades makes close to no sense...every trade is different. VAN is in no position to be giving up 1st rounders (especially not 2), WSH is.


Actually I think this trade makes sense for Vancouver. They're a top 6 winger and top 4 defender away from competing. Laine fills one of those gaps, and you hope either Juolevi or rathbone can eventually fill it too. Not to mention the canucks would have drafted a stud in the first round in 2020.

This trade makes perfect sense as Laine is similar age to the core and has played with Juolevi before so it adds cohesion.

Canucks will also have a better schedule next season and play in an easier division (pacific), this is a great move. Also using comparables makes complete sense...
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 36
#3
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: RC333
Actually I think this trade makes sense for Vancouver. They're a top 6 winger and top 4 defender away from competing. Laine fills one of those gaps, and you hope either Juolevi or rathbone can eventually fill it too. Not to mention the canucks would have drafted a stud in the first round in 2020.

This trade makes perfect sense as Laine is similar age to the core and has played with Juolevi before so it adds cohesion.

Canucks will also have a better schedule next season and play in an easier division (pacific), this is a great move. Also using comparables makes complete sense...


"would have drafted a stud in 2020"...what does that mean? I think they are much farther way than that - after the first line it's pretty weak and the D core is suspect, at best. Not to mention they're basically at the cap
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 41
#4
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Modifié 16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 55
Quoting: redw1n9s
"would have drafted a stud in 2020"...what does that mean? I think they are much farther way than that - after the first line it's pretty weak and the D core is suspect, at best. Not to mention they're basically at the cap


Do you not understand English? After the canucks 2021 draft they will most likely draft another top 10 pick. By that time they need to be adding to their roster and this move does that.

The only reason you think the canucks are farther away is because you aren't knowledgeable with the prospects and players on their team. Miller Petey Boeser horvat hoglander podkolzin are all good. Not to mention if u put Miller at 3C and spread out the depth the team can be much better.

In regards to the cap, I made it work with realistic contracts. I used comparables like Mcavoy and barzal.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,836
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
To compare roussel and vrana
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 47
#6
Canucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,221
Mentions "j'aime": 1,054
Quoting: RC333
Do you not understand English? After the canucks 2020 draft they will most likely draft another top 10 pick. By that time they need to be adding to their roster and this move does that.

The only reason you think the canucks are farther away is because you aren't knowledgeable with the prospects and players on their team. Miller Petey Boeser horvat hoglander podkolzin are all good. Not to mention if u put Miller at 3C and spread out the depth the team can be much better.

In regards to the cap, I made it work with realistic contracts. I used comparables like Mcavoy and barzal.


Agreed!
RC333 a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,836
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Quoting: RC333
Do you not understand English? After the canucks 2020 draft they will most likely draft another top 10 pick. By that time they need to be adding to their roster and this move does that.

The only reason you think the canucks are farther away is because you aren't knowledgeable with the prospects and players on their team. Miller Petey Boeser horvat hoglander podkolzin are all good. Not to mention if u put Miller at 3C and spread out the depth the team can be much better.

In regards to the cap, I made it work with realistic contracts. I used comparables like Mcavoy and barzal.

If you’re trying to insult someone, at least get the year right. Cause I’m assuming you’re talking about this years draft which is 2021
redw1n9s a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 52
#8
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Modifié 16 avr. 2021 à 16 h 16 par F50marco
Quoting: KINGS67
To compare roussel and vrana


I'm comparing Roussel to the cap dump that the caps sent over.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 53
#9
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: KINGS67
If you’re trying to insult someone, at least get the year right. Cause I’m assuming you’re talking about this years draft which is 2021


Wow what a huge mistake?? As long as you know what I'm saying we're good. If that's all u can say in regards to what I mentioned then I did a good job
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 57
#10
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: KINGS67
Not guy, guy. Wtf is your problem.


Lets just move on from the banter, it's not going anywhere. What do you think of the thread?
F50marco a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,836
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Quoting: RC333
Lets just move on from the banter, it's not going anywhere. What do you think of the thread?

It’s awful as I’ve mentioned
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 59
#12
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: KINGS67
It’s awful as I’ve mentioned


How so
Quoting: KINGS67
It’s awful as I’ve mentioned


How so? What needs to be added/subtracted?
16 avr. 2021 à 15 h 59
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,836
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Quoting: RC333
How so

How so? What needs to be added/subtracted?


They want a top 6 center
16 avr. 2021 à 16 h 1
#14
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: KINGS67
They want a top 6 center


Tbh I don't think they'll get that because Laine is underperforming and he's very 1 dimensional. Maybe if another center becomes available but otherwise i think they should commit to the rebuild and take prospects and picks
KINGS67 a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 16 h 33
#15
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: RC333
Do you not understand English? After the canucks 2021 draft they will most likely draft another top 10 pick. By that time they need to be adding to their roster and this move does that.

The only reason you think the canucks are farther away is because you aren't knowledgeable with the prospects and players on their team. Miller Petey Boeser horvat hoglander podkolzin are all good. Not to mention if u put Miller at 3C and spread out the depth the team can be much better.

In regards to the cap, I made it work with realistic contracts. I used comparables like Mcavoy and barzal.


I understand English perfectly well, which is why what you said made no sense. Everyone thinks their teams' prospects are "studs" but more often than not they are not. In fact, usually they are not even close. Pod is barely an NHL caliber player right now. Hoglander is decent, at best. You haven't even touched upon the lackluster D. As I've said, this team is in no position to be giving up multiple 1sts.

You're clearly out of your element here.
16 avr. 2021 à 16 h 53
#16
Démarrer sujet
Sexiest in the world
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Quoting: redw1n9s
I understand English perfectly well, which is why what you said made no sense. Everyone thinks their teams' prospects are "studs" but more often than not they are not. In fact, usually they are not even close. Pod is barely an NHL caliber player right now. Hoglander is decent, at best. You haven't even touched upon the lackluster D. As I've said, this team is in no position to be giving up multiple 1sts.

You're clearly out of your element here.


Podkolzin could have played in the canucks bottom 6 this year. He has a great defensive game that allows him to be at minimum a bottom 6 player. Its whether or not his offensive game develops that will signify if he can be a top 6 forward. His current production in the playoffs gives hope as he's still not getting a ton of ice time. But he's showing he can put up numbers in limited minutes.

Hoglander has produced at a 3rd line level this year which is fairly good considering he has been in matchup roles with horvat and Pearson against the top lines in hockey. His defensive zone time is about 55% due to this. If he gets more offensive zone time I can see him progressing with a higher production rate.

As to the defense, Juolevi is very good defensively. He was kept out of the lineup because green likes a veteran presence but Juolevi is phenomenal at passing the puck out of the zone. He has the tools to be a top 4 defenceman. He was another player getting mostly defensive zone ice time, and he actually formed a solid pairing with Myers who is terrible defensively.

As for rathbone, you may not be aware of him? But a quick scouting report and history on him is that he has good upside. His strengths are his skating and playmaking. He dominated in college by putting up just over a ppg, and currently that offence has transferred to the AHL where he's put up 9 points in 8 AHL games. He dominated the games too, he's not a floater, he had 7 shots on goal last game. He has good offensive instincts and so far he's also showing that he can be a force defensively as well. Not a physical player but relies on his positioning to retrieve pucks.

Im very knowledgeable on prospects. In fact I'm very knowledgeable on some wings prospects too If u ever wanna talk prospects.

With another top 10 pick this year the canucks will have all the youth they need. Its about filling in the gaps after that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage