SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New Take

Créé par: KingBurns
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 20 mars 2021
Publié: 20 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
We are currently 7th place and 9 points out of a playoff spot with about half of the season left. The last thing you might think to do is buy, but here's why I think it makes sense.

I think we can be a strong, competitive team next season (my most recent team). I think if we buy players with term, then we could use them this season to potentially sneak into the playoffs. If we don't it's fine, and we'd have them for next season.

Also look at how easy our schedule is for the next month
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Jaros, Christian
  2. Sörensen, Marcus
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Järnkrok, Calle (1 000 000 $ retained)
NSH
  1. Gregor, Noah
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 628 334 $0 $445 000 $8 871 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
0 $0 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 mars 2021 à 16 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 501
Mentions "j'aime": 241
I actually get it. I actually wouldn’t be shocked if they bought a little too.

SJ is 11-13-4 but 5 of those regulation losses are to VGK. They are actually pretty decent against the 6 other teams at 11-8-4

ST Louis in their last 20 games, starting 4/2, play Vegas/Col/Minny 17 times combined. They could have a rough final 6 weeks.
20 mars 2021 à 16 h 33
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
The idea is decent, but the trades are incredibly meh.

CBJ gets nothing worthwhile for Jenner

Preds aren't retaining on multi year Jarnkrok.
20 mars 2021 à 16 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,219
Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
Quoting: Vegasloveforthebills
I actually get it. I actually wouldn’t be shocked if they bought a little too.

SJ is 11-13-4 but 5 of those regulation losses are to VGK. They are actually pretty decent against the 6 other teams at 11-8-4

ST Louis in their last 20 games, starting 4/2, play Vegas/Col/Minny 17 times combined. They could have a rough final 6 weeks.


The win/loss record suggests at the least an okay team and I agree we aren't horrible, but that stat line doesn't tell the full story. SJ has gotten somewhat lucky in those games that went to a shootout or they ended up winning. Like the Blues game last night, the score should have been like 4-1 STL at the end of the game but Jones was a brick wall back there. Sharks are undoubtedly way worse than MIN, STL, COL and VGK when those teams are mostly healthy. I'd say we're on par with ARI and LAK, ANA being the only team we're for sure better than. Even if we're better than the latter 3 I mentioned, the Sharks aren't making it into the playoffs (even if the Blues stink the last half of the year), so I don't think there's any reason to buy unless a totally irresistible offer comes up.
Vegasloveforthebills a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2021 à 17 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: justaBoss
The idea is decent, but the trades are incredibly meh.

CBJ gets nothing worthwhile for Jenner

Preds aren't retaining on multi year Jarnkrok.


Don't think Jenner has a ton of value though.

Jaros could be a future 2nd pair defenseman and a 3rd round pick in a great draft has decent value.


I did the retention with the idea that Nashville would rebuild to some extent.
20 mars 2021 à 17 h 14
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: KingBurns
Don't think Jenner has a ton of value though.

Jaros could be a future 2nd pair defenseman and a 3rd round pick in a great draft has decent value.


I did the retention with the idea that Nashville would rebuild to some extent.


Jenner's a fan favorite mid-6 F in CBJ who's played pretty well this year. He's the only proven asset here.

Jaros is a 25 year old AHL D who got traded recently for an AHL winger and a 7th round pick. He's never making the NHL, most likely KHL bound next year. Sörensen's nothing but a cap dump at this point.

3rd could be of decent value, but far from enough.

As for Preds, they might be in for a retool, but they never retain on contracts. Since 2010 they haven't done it once. And they have traded away some big salary guys like Weber, Erat, Subban...
20 mars 2021 à 18 h 48
#6
Démarrer sujet
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: justaBoss
Jenner's a fan favorite mid-6 F in CBJ who's played pretty well this year. He's the only proven asset here.

Jaros is a 25 year old AHL D who got traded recently for an AHL winger and a 7th round pick. He's never making the NHL, most likely KHL bound next year. Sörensen's nothing but a cap dump at this point.

3rd could be of decent value, but far from enough.

As for Preds, they might be in for a retool, but they never retain on contracts. Since 2010 they haven't done it once. And they have traded away some big salary guys like Weber, Erat, Subban...


He's played over 75 NHL games. I think he could possibly be a 7th defenseman next year for the sharks, maybe even a 3rd pairing guy.

Didn't know that stat about Nashville, I could change a few things around though if we don't get retention.
20 mars 2021 à 20 h 36
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: KingBurns
He's played over 75 NHL games. I think he could possibly be a 7th defenseman next year for the sharks, maybe even a 3rd pairing guy.

Didn't know that stat about Nashville, I could change a few things around though if we don't get retention.


Yeah in one of the weakest teams in the league who had no other realistic options. Today he'd fit to the lineup nowhere.
20 mars 2021 à 20 h 45
#8
Démarrer sujet
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 238
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: justaBoss
Yeah in one of the weakest teams in the league who had no other realistic options. Today he'd fit to the lineup nowhere.


not this season, no, but next season, especially if we can get Seattle to take Burns, he could slot in as the 3rd pairing RD
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage