SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Making a team based on others posts

Créé par: Gmonwy
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 28 févr. 2021
Publié: 28 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Credit to
Systems
Justaboss
assuming Johnson waives
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Colton, Ross [Droits de RFA]
  2. Goncalves, Gage
  3. Johnson, Tyler (900 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Bennett, Sam [Droits de RFA]
3.
CGY
ANA
  1. Giordano, Mark
Détails additionnels:
Seattle
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de TBL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $69 097 499 $0 $147 500 $12 402 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,528
Mentions "j'aime": 295
It's a lot to take Johnson? I dont know if tampa is that desperate to get rid of him?
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,590
Mentions "j'aime": 19,712
Loosing Tanev would be a mistake
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 9
#3
Démarrer sujet
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,683
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Loosing Tanev would be a mistake


Who do I replace him with? Remove the Boston trade ans do Bennett?
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 11
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 927
Mentions "j'aime": 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who do I replace him with? Remove the Boston trade ans do Bennett?


Giordano.
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 13
#5
Démarrer sujet
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,683
Quoting: PhatRas
Giordano.


This good?
PhatRas a aimé ceci.
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 15
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 25
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I think the Johnson trade is one that can benefit both teams. Hes a solid top 9 forward and although that is a hefty package, Tampa will have to do what it takes to get rid of him.
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 23
#7
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 971
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Twins1568
It's a lot to take Johnson? I dont know if tampa is that desperate to get rid of him?


Agreed, johnson with retention could actually have value, if they retain say $600k more I think johnson a 3.5 is an attractive piece
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 32
#8
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 427
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Flames will expose Giordano over Tanev, and Im fairly confident Gio will give the green light to being exposed, as it's highly unlikely Seattle wants a declining 36 year old that has only 1 year left at 6.75M.

Valimaki doesn't require protection at the draft since he didn't play at all last season.

This means either Dube or Mangiapane are going to be the likely players Seattle will go after. However, Lucic should waive his NMC to also be exposed, meaning a protection spot won't be required for him, as again Seattle probably won't want to use their selection to take on his contract, relative to earnings and where he is in his career.

Protection should be this (assuming there is no scoring winger added during this season requiring protection)

F- Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Backlund, Lindholm, Mangiapane, Dube
D - Andersson, Tanev, Hanifin
G - Markstrom
28 févr. 2021 à 11 h 36
#9
Démarrer sujet
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,683
Quoting: DerpNation
Flames will expose Giordano over Tanev, and Im fairly confident Gio will give the green light to being exposed, as it's highly unlikely Seattle wants a declining 36 year old that has only 1 year left at 6.75M.

Valimaki doesn't require protection at the draft since he didn't play at all last season.

This means either Dube or Mangiapane are going to be the likely players Seattle will go after. However, Lucic should waive his NMC to also be exposed, meaning a protection spot won't be required for him, as again Seattle probably won't want to use their selection to take on his contract, relative to earnings and where he is in his career.

Protection should be this (assuming there is no scoring winger added during this season requiring protection)

F- Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Backlund, Lindholm, Mangiapane, Dube
D - Andersson, Tanev, Hanifin
G - Markstrom


Who do you think they take?
28 févr. 2021 à 12 h 23
#10
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 427
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who do you think they take?


Bennett or Kylington if Treliving doesn't add that scoring winger, and Gio and Lucic are OK with being exposed.

If Tre does add that scoring winger and it's not a rental, then Mangiapane or Dube will likely be taken.

This is also why I could see Treliving contemplating packaging Dube or Mangiapane in a trade to acquire that proven scoring winger, as he will lose a protection spot for one of them, risking losing them for nothing anyways.
28 févr. 2021 à 12 h 25
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Either Gonclaves or Colton? Not both
28 févr. 2021 à 12 h 25
#12
Démarrer sujet
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,683
Quoting: DerpNation
Bennett or Kylington if Treliving doesn't add that scoring winger, and Gio and Lucic are OK with being exposed.

If Tre does add that scoring winger and it's not a rental, then Mangiapane or Dube will likely be taken.

This is also why I could see Treliving contemplating packaging Dube or Mangiapane in a trade to acquire that proven scoring winger, as he will lose a protection spot for one of them, risking losing them for nothing anyways.


I can see Tre giving a puck or prospect not to take Dube or Mangiapane. Bennett has been packaged in this ACGM so Kylington?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage