SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

FUTUUUUURE updated

Créé par: JacobLyons
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 janv. 2021
Publié: 25 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is all just for fun.
If the Sharks make the playoffs, you give Seattle the 2021 first round draft pick. Also the names don’t have to be specifically those players. It’s just after Jones and Vlasic depart, and Patrick Marleau’s retirement, you need a new starting goalie, a few bottom six options, and a new bottom pairing option. To me, from what I’ve seen, Donato and Gambrell have looked great where they’re playing and you need to give the benefit of the doubt that they’ll continue somewhere near their current pace.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
3950 000 $
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
21 500 000 $
33 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
32 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
SJS
    Seattle Expansion Draft
    ANA
    1. Jones, Martin
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $66 532 029 $0 $1 575 000 $14 967 971 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 9
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 12,841
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
    They really should get rid of Burns before Jones. Burns' deal will not age well in the slightest. The second his moving ability declines so does his entire play. Plus Jones is easier to buyout
    JacobLyons a aimé ceci.
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 15
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 394
    Mentions "j'aime": 53
    Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
    They really should get rid of Burns before Jones. Burns' deal will not age well in the slightest. The second his moving ability declines so does his entire play. Plus Jones is easier to buyout


    It’s honestly a toss up who you want to give Seattle however my ONLY gripe with Jones is, would you rather 6 million for a goalie that’s analytically played like 1.5 million dollar goalie or keep a 8 million dollars defenseman who’s playing like a 4 million dollar defenseman? Also with Vlasic being bought out, I wanted to limit buyouts unless it was NECESSARY. Like Vlasic’s contact that’s only going to get worse.
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 18
    #3
    John Leonard Viewer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 444
    I think it's fair, but I'd rather not do that Jones trade, Shane Wright is very good at hockey. I have a lot of issues with this roster:

    Vlasic has a NMC which he wouldn't waive. That's 7 mil we can't use
    Hamonic is a luxury we wouldn't need with Merkley entering the league at this time
    Overpay for Raanta a little
    Timo wouldn't stay on the third line (he's just currently in the dog house, give it a few games to change)
    The way Donato is playing, he probably gets more like 3 mil (look what Labanc got for similar numbers, a 5x4 essentially)
    With the current status of cap, can probably offer less to Gambler and Gregor
    I'd personally go for a guy more like Armia Dzingel or Hyman instead of Hyman, but they would be pricier
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 24
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 394
    Mentions "j'aime": 53
    Quoting: jfrojelin
    I think it's fair, but I'd rather not do that Jones trade, Shane Wright is very good at hockey. I have a lot of issues with this roster:

    Vlasic has a NMC which he wouldn't waive. That's 7 mil we can't use
    Hamonic is a luxury we wouldn't need with Merkley entering the league at this time
    Overpay for Raanta a little
    Timo wouldn't stay on the third line (he's just currently in the dog house, give it a few games to change)
    The way Donato is playing, he probably gets more like 3 mil (look what Labanc got for similar numbers, a 5x4 essentially)
    With the current status of cap, can probably offer less to Gambler and Gregor
    I'd personally go for a guy more like Armia Dzingel or Hyman instead of Hyman, but they would be pricier


    I had no idea NMC included buyouts but fair enough.
    Something tells me Merkley won’t be ready for a top 6 role just yet. I’ve been the biggest backer of him but we’ll see.
    I honestly thought it was an underpay. Raanta is what the Sharks need to get into the playoffs.
    Again the contracts aren’t supposed to be exact, which is why I still left 4 million in cap space.
    Gregor for sure, but I feel like Gamby will get that type of contact to be the team’s third line center.
    I’d LOVE someone like Hyman, but with Kane, Hertl, and Meier, why get ANOTHER grinder like scoring option, I’d rather a shoot first guy. So Dzingle would be an interesting option. Also with that Jones trade, this is what would happen if the team doesn’t tank. (No pun intended)
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 25
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
    futureee.jpg
    JacobLyons et MJC13 a aimé ceci.
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 27
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 394
    Mentions "j'aime": 53
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    futureee.jpg

    Absolutely!
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    25 janv. 2021 à 22 h 28
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
    Quoting: JacobLyons
    Absolutely!


    I appreciate the reference haha
    25 janv. 2021 à 23 h 10
    #8
    John Leonard Viewer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 444
    Quoting: JacobLyons
    I had no idea NMC included buyouts but fair enough.
    Something tells me Merkley won’t be ready for a top 6 role just yet. I’ve been the biggest backer of him but we’ll see.
    I honestly thought it was an underpay. Raanta is what the Sharks need to get into the playoffs.
    Again the contracts aren’t supposed to be exact, which is why I still left 4 million in cap space.
    Gregor for sure, but I feel like Gamby will get that type of contact to be the team’s third line center.
    I’d LOVE someone like Hyman, but with Kane, Hertl, and Meier, why get ANOTHER grinder like scoring option, I’d rather a shoot first guy. So Dzingle would be an interesting option. Also with that Jones trade, this is what would happen if the team doesn’t tank. (No pun intended)


    OOPS I read "buried" not "buyout" sorry
    JacobLyons et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    26 janv. 2021 à 11 h 41
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,383
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
    Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
    They really should get rid of Burns before Jones. Burns' deal will not age well in the slightest. The second his moving ability declines so does his entire play. Plus Jones is easier to buyout


    Burns is clearly still a top 2 D man on almost any team and he is a physical specimen, I see no reason he doesn’t age like a Blake or Charra so I say we keep him, Jones has looked much better this season so far and his numbers will reflect that before the end of this season. Vlasic IMO is the weakest link on this team right now.
    26 janv. 2021 à 11 h 46
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,383
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
    Quoting: JacobLyons
    It’s honestly a toss up who you want to give Seattle however my ONLY gripe with Jones is, would you rather 6 million for a goalie that’s analytically played like 1.5 million dollar goalie or keep a 8 million dollars defenseman who’s playing like a 4 million dollar defenseman? Also with Vlasic being bought out, I wanted to limit buyouts unless it was NECESSARY. Like Vlasic’s contact that’s only going to get worse.


    Who is the 8 mill D man who plays like a 4 mil D man?
    Vlasic buyout won’t happen for 2-3 more years, personally I’d rather bury him in the minors or force his retirement rather than have him on the books for 10 more years
    26 janv. 2021 à 11 h 49
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,383
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
    Modifié 26 janv. 2021 à 12 h 5
    Quoting: JacobLyons
    I had no idea NMC included buyouts but fair enough.
    Something tells me Merkley won’t be ready for a top 6 role just yet. I’ve been the biggest backer of him but we’ll see.
    I honestly thought it was an underpay. Raanta is what the Sharks need to get into the playoffs.
    Again the contracts aren’t supposed to be exact, which is why I still left 4 million in cap space.
    Gregor for sure, but I feel like Gamby will get that type of contact to be the team’s third line center.
    I’d LOVE someone like Hyman, but with Kane, Hertl, and Meier, why get ANOTHER grinder like scoring option, I’d rather a shoot first guy. So Dzingle would be an interesting option. Also with that Jones trade, this is what would happen if the team doesn’t tank. (No pun intended)


    Merkely is a great talent but he needed a year in the AHL and both Boughner and Wilson seem to agree with time! Bringing him up slowly is smart as he is an undersized D man and is a boom/ Bust prospect so rushing him could destroy him mentally.
    I’ve really liked Gambrell’s game the last two games and Gregor and Leonard so far. I’m hoping that continues. Ferraro has been a huge grab and knuzohv has had solid flashes and I have high hopes! All and all this team looks a lot stronger than last year and has potential

    Vlasic is our biggest problem, he’s serviceable D man so I don’t want to bash him, but a 7 mill a year serviceable player is a problem to our cap. I don’t want to buy him out so I’m hoping for a better option but I don’t see one.
    JacobLyons a aimé ceci.
    26 janv. 2021 à 20 h 5
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 394
    Mentions "j'aime": 53
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    Who is the 8 mill D man who plays like a 4 mil D man?
    Vlasic buyout won’t happen for 2-3 more years, personally I’d rather bury him in the minors or force his retirement rather than have him on the books for 10 more years

    Analytically, Burns is playing like a 4.5 million dollar defenseman but I still love him.
    27 janv. 2021 à 15 h 30
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,383
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,745
    Quoting: JacobLyons
    Analytically, Burns is playing like a 4.5 million dollar defenseman but I still love him.

    I highly disagree with that but ok.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage