PLD's never been to an all-star game, never received one of the NHL's awards (like Player of the Week, etc), and never been considered for a trophy outside of his rookie year, where he placed eighth in the Calder with 0 first place votes. Let me know what the criteria is for being a star, because it seems like your definition is a little broad.

I'm assuming English is not your first language, so I what I meant was I'd like you to show me (and gavinray) the statistics that indicate Brannstrom is a bust. You're making the claim and should be the one to back it up, because no one is agreeing with you.

you need medical attention. Brannstrom have a bigger chance to be a bust then a nhl star, this is a fact. there nothing to be confused about. Dubois is already a star and none of the three playrs or pick propose are close to be a star.

gfy:
" Brannstrom have a bigger chance to be a bust then a nhl star, this is a fact. there nothing to be confused about."

gfy literally 30 mins ago:
"How can a established players can be a bust. are you listening to yourself sometime? there no much logic and common sense in that. "

Flip flopping more than Barkov on the beach

Have you heard of Adam Foote or Bryan Rafalski. What about Igor larionov Milan Hedjuk. Ron francis, Rob Brind'amour, JOhn LeClair. Does players warent star i supposed since they didnt win their fair share of trophy.
and for the 10 times already Brannstrom have more chance of beiing a bust then to have a impact in NHL. Not once i have said that Brannstrom was a bust. you can read **** even if english is your first language.
2013 draft : there been on the 30 players selected 11 players that have had a impact when they where on their ELC. on the 19 remaining 5 of them have found success but none of them have turn into a star on their sexond contract and their 14 players that are in the minors, have no contract anymore or are support players.

2015draft : (one of the best draft ever) on 30 players 16 of these players have had a immediate impact on their ELC. on the 14 remaining 6 of them are now with the team and have a moderated impact.

2010draft : on 30 players 7 had established themselve into NHL on their ELC and on the 23 remaining only 2 have turn into a nhl regular and 4 more that have had a moderated career.

so yeah Brannstrom have more chance of beiing a bust then to turn into a NHL regular.

Some of the guys on your jumble of a list had some accolades I mentioned in my post. Hedjuk may have not won many trophies but he went to the All-Star game a few times, for example. PLD can absolutely be a star player in the NHL, but he hasn't hit that mark yet. You're putting the cart before the horse when talking about him.

Also, don't parse words with me when you can barely form a coherent sentence. You knew what I meant. If I can read through your obnoxiously arrogant word salads, you can give me the benefit of the doubt by knowing that I meant "provide proof that Brannstrom has a bigger chance to be bust".

And no, three drafts don't cut it as proof. "Immediate impact on their ELC" isn't quantifiable proof. "Moderated career" doesn't mean anything. Actually demonstrate that defenseman with the same trajectory as Brannstrom bust more often than make it.

le jour que tu pourras me répondre en Français dans une syntaxe et grammaire parfaite on en reparlera.

Maybe I'll learn french if you can make your point.

mon point est prouver depuis longtemps. mais il y a un petit con qui continue a obstiner sans apporter aucune preuve a ces propos et ca me fait assez rire