SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A trade

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2021
Publié: 5 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Roslovic, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Suomela, Antti
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 840 000 $0 $277 500 $7 660 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 janv. 2021 à 2 h 19
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 23
would have to think that Roslovic would cost more
5 janv. 2021 à 3 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,229
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Seems fair. If the Sharks were legitimately interested in Roslovic, I wouldn't mind paying this price.
5 janv. 2021 à 3 h 29
#3
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
So for starters even as a Sharks fan I think a more legit prospect than Gallant would be needed. More importantly, with Donato and Roslovic you put patty on the 2nd lmaoooo
5 janv. 2021 à 11 h 27
#4
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: jfrojelin
So for starters even as a Sharks fan I think a more legit prospect than Gallant would be needed. More importantly, with Donato and Roslovic you put patty on the 2nd lmaoooo


Why not? Leafs put Thornton to first line LW. Give the guy every help he can get and he's a beneficial asset for you.
5 janv. 2021 à 18 h 20
#5
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Seems fair. If the Sharks were legitimately interested in Roslovic, I wouldn't mind paying this price.


really?

Gallant doesn't really have any value imo and Suomela is probably a 3rd line forward at best. So really the 2nd is the only real thing with value and Roslovic is worth more than that I think.
5 janv. 2021 à 18 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: SalVulcano
really?

Gallant doesn't really have any value imo and Suomela is probably a 3rd line forward at best. So really the 2nd is the only real thing with value and Roslovic is worth more than that I think.


Point taken. I'll change the prospect.
5 janv. 2021 à 18 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,240
Mentions "j'aime": 4,673
Blichfeld is a talented guy who's ceiling is right around that of Roslovick IMO, and I don't want to give up a single pick in 2022 we need that draft to recoup top end talent.
with Roslo demanding a trade his value has plummeted, meaning we should be able to get him for a steal.
Blich 2021 3rd and one of our LD prospects should be more than enough.
otherwise I say we pass, Roslo wont be the difference between top 5 pick and playoffs
5 janv. 2021 à 19 h 29
#8
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Blichfeld is a talented guy who's ceiling is right around that of Roslovick IMO, and I don't want to give up a single pick in 2022 we need that draft to recoup top end talent.
with Roslo demanding a trade his value has plummeted, meaning we should be able to get him for a steal.
Blich 2021 3rd and one of our LD prospects should be more than enough.
otherwise I say we pass, Roslo wont be the difference between top 5 pick and playoffs


I do agree. Hence it was originally Suomela+Gallant+2nd, but I got told that it's not enough, so I changed it to a better prospect.
5 janv. 2021 à 20 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,240
Mentions "j'aime": 4,673
Quoting: justaBoss
I do agree. Hence it was originally Suomela+Gallant+2nd, but I got told that it's not enough, so I changed it to a better prospect.

None of this prospects concern me as much as the 2nd.
I just don’t think he’s worth that haul. If I’m trading a first or 2nd I’d rather go after a guy like Strome in Chicago
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage