SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

15-16 Hawks Blockbuster (plz comment)

Créé par: trammelt
Équipe: 2015-16 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2015
Publié: 13 juill. 2015
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Please comment!!!! especially fans of trade partner teams, do you you think the trades are fair?
-Ehlers would be great fit on 1LW, would have to give up a lot and take back salary.
-Oduya, and Kruger are resignable at that price.

-Would perhaps have to give up more to move bickell. Although higher pic and Ross should be able to do it.
-Pavelec would be a good, veteran backup, if Darling cannot take on role.

-Anisimov is more of a 3C than a 2C

-deepest Defense since 2010?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Crawford, Corey
  2. Kero, Tanner
  3. Versteeg, Kris
Détails additionnels:
2017 2nd round pick
2016 3rd round pick
2.
CHI
    2016 4th round pick
    TOR
    1. Bickell, Bryan
    2. Ross, Garret
    Détails additionnels:
    2017 3rd round pick
    Rachats de contrats
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2371 400 000 $63 450 129 $750 000 $4 225 000 $7 949 871 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance575 000 $$575K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    812 500 $812 500 $ (Bonis de performance2 800 000 $$3M)
    AG
    UFA - 2
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    3 283 333 $3 283 333 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    1 040 000 $1 040 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    587 500 $587 500 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juill. 2015 à 16 h 19
    #1
    The Savior Foretold
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 43
    Mentions "j'aime": 3
    I doubt the leafs do that trade. The 2016 4th rounder will be very early with the 2017 3rd from Chicago being very late. Essentially these picks are close in value so I doubt toronto does Chicago the favor of taking two contracts back one of which people consider a dump
    Also I don't think you will get Ehlers, the Jets (and particularly their fans) are very high on him
    13 juill. 2015 à 16 h 32
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 25
    Mentions "j'aime": 4
    I think that the Winnipeg deal is more than fair, but like McJesus said above, the Jets are very high on Ehlers.

    Im kinda on the fence about the Toronto deal.... I truly doubt Bickel will be traded for that little, and the Leafs have an abundance of cap space so taking his contract shouldn't be a problem

    Very solid roster though, especially considering that you have one extra player and 800k in cap space.
    RabbleRabble668 a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2015 à 17 h 11
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 6
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    I can understand the Jets trade but we have Ehlers on the nearly untouchable list. There's no doubt he'll be one of our franchise players, it would take a lot more than Versteeg and Crawford to entice CHevy to trade him.

    The Toronto trade seems a bit lopsided. That's an increidbly low return for those two players together.
    13 juill. 2015 à 18 h 28
    #4
    scarchelli
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 51
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Waste of time making this since theres a 0% chance crawford goes anywhere. He has a NMC he definitely isnt waiving anytime soon.
    13 juill. 2015 à 19 h 17
    #5
    SJsharksBlogger
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 80
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Absurd.

    Crawford laughed at the idea of waiving his FULL NO MOVEMENT CLAUSE.

    AND

    The Jets have the goalie of the future in Hellebuyck in the minors 1 more year, another year of legitimate starter Hutchinson on an ELC and another little bit with Pavelec platooning.
    13 juill. 2015 à 20 h 33
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 397
    Mentions "j'aime": 32
    Leafs just don't have room for Bickell at this point. Also wouldn't do the Ehlers trade if I'm Winnipeg regardless of any NMCs. The Jets are not the kind of organization that will trade premium prospects for goalies making $6m a season.
    14 juill. 2015 à 10 h 24
    #7
    SJsharksBlogger
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 80
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Quoting: Jarett18
    Leafs just don't have room for Bickell at this point. Also wouldn't do the Ehlers trade if I'm Winnipeg regardless of any NMCs. The Jets are not the kind of organization that will trade premium prospects for goalies making $6m a season.

    And they flat do not need him. They have 3 legit goalies

    Try Keith, Seabrook, Kane or Toews
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage