SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Salvaging our bad offseason

Créé par: AdnacOil
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 31 oct. 2020
Publié: 31 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1) Larsson shouldn't make the team, but I don't want to speculate on what he can and can't be traded for. If he can be traded for picks, then use that money to sign Ethan Bear longer term. If he must be moved in a hockey trade (Tanner Pearson?), then play the acquired player 3LW, move Ennis to 3RW, then look to trade preferably Kassian if possible, Chiasson if not.

2) Mike Smith isn't an NHL caliber goalie. I don't have the exact list of goalies that need to go on waivers, but I'd bet my life savings that a lot of them will be better than Smith. Claim one of them and move Smith to the minors.

3) I got a lot of high earners in the minors. They aren't NHL level players, and they don't have clauses that force them to stay in the NHL. The NMC is there for a reason, if they don't have it, then they can be moved down for any reason.

Edit:

4) I see the Adam Larsson hive is alive and well. Keep in mind, he has not been traded yet. If everyone insists that a dman who's been outscored 162-121 in the last 3 seasons is a vital part of our team, then we will be fully cap compliant playing him and sending Bouchard to the minors
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $80 389 032 $341 534 $1 230 000 $1 110 968 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 oct. 2020 à 19 h 33
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 43
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
While I no longer advocate the extension of Adam Larsson, to discount the role he plays on this team is disingenuous at best: he is Edmonton's strongest defensive option on the blueline and eats a myriad of minutes. There's value in having him paired with Jones for this season: Edmonton's going to be running a very young blueline for the foreseeable future and maximizing how much Adam can pass onto guys like Jones and Bear before he leaves has value. If you trade Larsson, the structure of the blueline as a whole crumbles: you either end up with Bear playing 24+ minutes a night or Russell playing more than 16. I don't think he's by far the most optimal name Edmonton could be employing, but given that there's but a year left on his deal, he's far from being the primary issue this team had last year. A healthy Larsson is a legitimate top-4 option. The only caveat is that he needs to be healthy.

Burying Neal makes no sense at all, short or long-term. You only gain a hair over a million dollars in cap flexibility: fundamentally it makes more sense to bite the bullet on a buyout and take on more cap savings for success now despite the three extra years of his $2M buyout hit. You appear to have tried to find a middle ground, but only found an inferior option. The play is to pay another team to take (at minimum) 50% of his deal or buy him out. Maybe this season, maybe next, but burying him shouldn't be the primary option. Even Montreal saw the light in an Alzner buyout.

Bouchard doesn't need to be in the NHL this season. An extra year of development isn't hurting him.


I advocate for Bouchard to play, but Larsson hasn't been moved. If you all insist that a 30% 5v5 GF% dman needs to play, he will fit under the cap with Bouchard in the minors.

Burying Neal makes a lot of sense. We can fit him under the cap this season, so by burying him this season, we shave 1 year off his eventual buyout if we choose to do so. Buying him out next season has us on the hook until 2025 instead of 2026. But yes, I agree that paying another team to take him at 50% retention is the best move. I just didn't want to speculate too much on trades. I wanted this to be centralized around what we can do on our own account.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage