SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2020 Canucks - TBL OTT MIN deals

Créé par: chc16
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 12 oct. 2020
Publié: 12 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The TBL trade looks terrible for TB... but, they get 3 years of cap relief in the end... could swap any of Sutter, Beagle instead. OTT...gets a potential star goalie of the future for eating salary for 1 year that will also get them up to the floor. Could be any pick... spitballing a 3rd. Boeser is a tough deal, but it really addresses needs for both teams. UFA's are just filling gaps until Podkolzin and Lind are ready. Tryamkin… why not?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
11 100 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 700 000 $
16 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Eriksson, Loui (1 000 000 $ retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
3.
VAN
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 873 545 $1 700 000 $4 550 000 $2 626 455 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 43
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Lol Tampa Declines. They are trying to shed cap, Erikson will not help them
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
I need more of an explanation on your idea for the Tampa trade because it completely baffles me how it’s supposed to help the Bolts at all.

How does this help them shed cap for the upcoming season?
Pond_Duck a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,068
Mentions "j'aime": 12,075
None of that gets a 3rd from Ottawa. DiPietro is fine, but Ottawa is fully clogged up in the goalie pipeline. It's always nice to have more shots with goalies, but it's not worth the cost of blocking young players NHL roster spots next year.
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 51
#4
Démarrer sujet
Chc16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: NLidstrom
I need more of an explanation on your idea for the Tampa trade because it completely baffles me how it’s supposed to help the Bolts at all.

How does this help them shed cap for the upcoming season?


5 more years of TJ vs 2 years of LE. In the end its 25 million vs 12 million in salary. I know its a ****e deal, but better than giving up a 1st to get rid of TJ no?
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
Chc16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
None of that gets a 3rd from Ottawa. DiPietro is fine, but Ottawa is fully clogged up in the goalie pipeline. It's always nice to have more shots with goalies, but it's not worth the cost of blocking young players NHL roster spots next year.


It could be a 7th, or a bag of pucks, or futures that never get paid out. Cap relief and everyone else in deal has only 1 year left on their deals. Plus they are better than much of what OTT can play.
12 oct. 2020 à 23 h 54
#6
Démarrer sujet
Chc16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: chc16
5 more years of TJ vs 2 years of LE. In the end its 25 million vs 12 million in salary. I know its a ****e deal, but better than giving up a 1st to get rid of TJ no?


What about 1 year of Sutter or Beagle instead?
13 oct. 2020 à 0 h 1
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,068
Mentions "j'aime": 12,075
Quoting: chc16
It could be a 7th, or a bag of pucks, or futures that never get paid out. Cap relief and everyone else in deal has only 1 year left on their deals. Plus they are better than much of what OTT can play.


But my point is that Ottawa needs the roster spots for this one year more than they would need DiPietro going forward. It's a wasted season anyway in the sense that they're not going to be good, so why would they waste it further by playing Sven Baertschi instead of finding out what you have in a prospect like Rudolfs Balcers or Filip Chlapik ahead of the Seattle expansion draft. Also I don't think either player is better than the players can fill internally, there may be an argument they're better than the Zaitsevs or the Watsons, but they aren't pushing those guys out of a spot to begin with.
chc16 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2020 à 0 h 6
#8
Démarrer sujet
Chc16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
But my point is that Ottawa needs the roster spots for this one year more than they would need DiPietro going forward. It's a wasted season anyway in the sense that they're not going to be good, so why would they waste it further by playing Sven Baertschi instead of finding out what you have in a prospect like Rudolfs Balcers or Filip Chlapik ahead of the Seattle expansion draft. Also I don't think either player is better than the players can fill internally, there may be an argument they're better than the Zaitsevs or the Watsons, but they aren't pushing those guys out of a spot to begin with.


For what its worth... they may not even play a season because of Covid… but yes, I totally see your point. Just trying to creatively dump cap space on your team.
13 oct. 2020 à 11 h 1
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 1,244
OTT rejects in a heartbeat.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage