Van declines, others would accept.

R u dumb? Why would canucks decline this is a good trade

Glad you could come by to comment "this is enough" or "this is a good trade" on a bunch of stuff that it terrible.

Just in time for me to add someone else to the ignore list. Glad you could stop by.

LOL someones mad.
Im a canucks fan
this trade is great were getting TWO top 4 defencemen

Jake Debrusk isn't a defenceman lol.

No way BOS accepts that trade either. With a 27 goal season and no season with less than 16 goals (as a rookie), DeBrusk is better than Garland and significantly better Virtanen. Bjork has put up smaller numbers than Garland and Virtanen, but his development was delayed by a year because of a shoulder injury (which is now healed) and has .31 pts/gm compared to Virtanen's .34 pts/gm. Bjork still has a high ceiling. BOS doesn't improve by swapping out Bjork and DeBrusk for Garland and Virtanen, and there is absolutely no way they can afford to spend $3.3 mil on an AHL player in Sven Baertschi. As their core ages and their window of opportunity for a championship closes, BOS needs to free up cap space for a true top 6 winger, much less throw away $3.3 mil for absolutely nothing. Player for player, the Bruins become a worse team with this deal, they waste cap space they don't have, AND they lose a draft pick. This trade in no way makes sense for BOS.