SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade with Rangers - Read Description

Créé par: BA791
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 août 2020
Publié: 19 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hey Flames fans, should you lose to Dallas, I have heard rumblings of potentially blowing the team up. Is that accurate from what you want or hear as well? Aside from 1OA, Kakko, Zbad, and Shesty, what would you need from the Rangers to trade Monahan? I added some cost controlled pieces to start the conversation, but I’m curious to hear what you would want.
Transactions
CGY
  1. Chytil, Filip
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
What else??
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $67 523 791 $0 $1 947 500 $13 976 209 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
715 000 $715 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 893 750 $1 893 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 août 2020 à 20 h 0
#26
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: saysthemachine
He's younger than Mika and Panarin...


The point is you trade away two pieces with the same/if not higher ceiling AND a 1st to get a guy who’s production has been on a decline. Rushing this is going to put us right back in mediocrity to ruin Shesty’s career just like we did Hank’s. We have to be patient...

Not to mention this does nothing for Calgary now. They are in win now mode. Trading Monahan leaves a huge hole on their roster that Chytil can’t quite fill yet...
19 août 2020 à 20 h 5
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
Quoting: buchiegang
The point is you trade away two pieces with the same/if not higher ceiling AND a 1st to get a guy who’s production has been on a decline. Rushing this is going to put us right back in mediocrity to ruin Shesty’s career just like we did Hank’s. We have to be patient...

Not to mention this does nothing for Calgary now. They are in win now mode. Trading Monahan leaves a huge hole on their roster that Chytil can’t quite fill yet...


We're undervaluing Monahan pretty severely here. But I agree, the Flames don't want this deal, regardless of what it looks like to us. To them it looks like a lot of lottery tickets, and one might even just be a scratcher.
BA791 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 13
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: buchiegang
This reverses half the rebuild in one, Sather-esque move...


I strongly disagree. If monahan was like 31-32, I would agree. The dude is 25 and could potentially help us contend next year. Also, look at Calgary’s forward core, it’s pretty average aside from him and Gaudreau.

I also only asked this only if they decide to blow the team up.
saysthemachine a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 17
#29
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: BA791
I strongly disagree. If monahan was like 31-32, I would agree. The dude is 25 and could potentially help us contend next year.


Maybe so, but from my perspective the Rangers are not a Monahan away from contending. The defense group still needs a lot of work (good prospects coming but can’t rush them). My point is rushing the window is a bad idea. Trading away prospects that could have a longer term impact is a bad move, especially after getting so many of them over the last few years. If in 1 to 2 years we’re one piece away from contending and their are quality prospects blocked on the depth chart by other good players, that’s when you pull the trigger. It’s too early in the process to be making this kind of move...
BA791 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 20
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: buchiegang
Maybe so, but from my perspective the Rangers are not a Monahan away from contending. The defense group still needs a lot of work (good prospects coming but can’t rush them). My point is rushing the window is a bad idea. Trading away prospects that could have a longer term impact is a bad move, especially after getting so many of them over the last few years. If in 1 to 2 years we’re one piece away from contending and their are quality prospects blocked on the depth chart by other good players, that’s when you pull the trigger. It’s too early in the process to be making this kind of move...


I can get behind this. I just want that number 2 center sooner than later. I don’t want to waste time and money with strome when he’s just simply not the answer, no matter how well he plays with Panarin. God forbid Panarin goes down, he wouldn’t be able to keep up with good teams 2C’s.

I would also look to make another move for a shutdown LHD. I think that would put us right there with contending for a solid 5+ years.
buchiegang a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 21
#31
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: saysthemachine
Agreed. Those things do happen in hockey. However, I still think you're too high on Chytil. I've watched pretty much every game of his and it just doesn't seem like he has the presence of mind to be as important as Monahan. Granted, I'm not diving deep into analytics or anything. It's important to remember that for every Martin St. Louis there are thousands of 1st rounders that never turned into anything. I'll be glad if he's eventually tuned his abilities enough to be as impactful as Blake Coleman.


If youve read any of my posts about Chytil, youd know Im not high on the kid and think he belongs on the wing, but with 2 years left as a RFA... hes a cost controlled 3C and we got nothing to lose really. However, by no means is he untouchable in my eyes.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 24
#32
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: BA791
I can get behind this. I just want that number 2 center sooner than later. I don’t want to waste time and money with strome when he’s just simply not the answer, no matter how well he plays with Panarin. God forbid Panarin goes down, he wouldn’t be able to keep up with good teams 2C’s.

I would also look to make another move for a shutdown LHD. I think that would put us right there with contending for a solid 5+ years.


Theres been plenty of hypothetical moves for Hampus Lindholm and Vince Dunn to shore up the LHD. I like the idea of Hampus + Trouba/Fox as the top pair.
BA791 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 26
#33
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: aecliptic
Theres been plenty of hypothetical moves for Hampus Lindholm and Vince Dunn to shore up the LHD. I like the idea of Hampus + Trouba/Fox as the top pair.

ADA+ for Lindholm is a compelling move, noting our LHD deficiency and their RHD deficiency...
19 août 2020 à 20 h 29
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 17
As a Flames fan, I would like to see Buchnevich coming back. If you subbed him in for Chytil would this still be appealing?
BA791 a aimé ceci.
19 août 2020 à 20 h 30
#35
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: The_Gaudfather
As a Flames fan, I would like to see Buchnevich coming back. If you subbed him in for Chytil would this still be appealing?


Take my money now! Lol. I figured chytil would have more value than buch. You can have him haha
19 août 2020 à 22 h 42
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: BA791
Take my money now! Lol. I figured chytil would have more value than buch. You can have him haha


I don't understand why NY fans don't like Buch, seems like a really good player to me. Monahan can't really drive a line on his own. Isn't great outside of his shot. Chytil is also good, but I feel like people really underrate Buchnevich. If you'd part with both of them, we'd probably do that too haha
20 août 2020 à 1 h 58
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
oops.
20 août 2020 à 10 h 49
#38
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: The_Gaudfather
I don't understand why NY fans don't like Buch, seems like a really good player to me. Monahan can't really drive a line on his own. Isn't great outside of his shot. Chytil is also good, but I feel like people really underrate Buchnevich. If you'd part with both of them, we'd probably do that too haha


I think it’s because we watch buch every day. buch is soft on the puck, makes boneheaded plays all the time, and has a knack for not finishing and getting VERY frustrated with himself. With our plethora of wings and lack of centers, moving him in a package for a high end 2C is ideal.

As for monahan fitting in with the rangers, he could be on Panarin’s line. Monahan could shoot to his hearts desire with Bread’s ability to pass the puck. Then you can put either laf or kakko with them. Top line would be laf zbad kreids or Kreids zbad kakko. Second line would then be laf monahan bread or bread monahan kakko.

End result would be 2 top lines that could be very deadly.
The_Gaudfather a aimé ceci.
20 août 2020 à 22 h 30
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 67
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Strome, Rykov, Carolina pick, Non blue chip prospect/pick?
21 août 2020 à 0 h 17
#40
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Liam052497
Strome, Rykov, Carolina pick, Non blue chip prospect/pick?


You think that would be enough? i feel like we may have to overpay a bit for a young player thats still under contract.
21 août 2020 à 9 h 36
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 67
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: BA791
You think that would be enough? i feel like we may have to overpay a bit for a young player thats still under contract.


Eh, I don’t think that’d be enough if I was Calgary, wouldn’t be the first time NYR got a great deal from a desperate team tho
BA791 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage