30 points in 61 games was last year, and 53 points in 68 games was this year. If Vegas doesn’t need Tony D because of his lack of defense, then so be it. But the prize for him should be a 1st and a little more, and we won’t trade him until the value is met.

Then it looks like he'll be a Ranger for life.

no, the value of a 1st rounder plus a little more is reasonable. Perhaps a 2nd rounder in addition to the first may be a little steep, but a 1st + a 3rd, or a 1st + a B prospect should definitely do it.

TDA is a PP specialist and an offensive defenseman. He plays minimal defense, and I’m sure a lot of teams don’t like his attitude, since it’s been an issue since he was drafted and has continued during his tenure with the Rangers. He’s probably the most over rated player value wise on this site.

Tony D doesn’t have “attitude problems”. He shares his political opinions and gets hate for it because they differ from the status quo. All his teammates love him and he’s a good guy. The fact that he is a powerplay quarterback and elite offensively is where he gains his value.

Oh he doesn't? I guess he was traded twice before the age of 23 because he's such a great guy who endears himself to management. You're so biased- here's what Rick Carpinello had to say about TDA's trade value in a Q&A on The Athletic.

"It's still not great, I would think. He doesn't defend well, has a personality that some coaches might not want. I think he's worth more to the Rangers at the moment than he would be to another team. Now if he has another good season, or good start to the season, that changes."

So a guy who covers the team for a living says his trade value isn't great, and he may have attitude issues, but you, a random guy on ACGM, says he is worth a 1st and 3rd and acts like an angel. Got it.