SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff setup

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Only big change I have in my lines is on defense. I honestly don’t care if seabrook is healthy. The only way I’d play him is if he proves beyond ANY doubt he can actually keep up with the playoff pace. Otherwise, let’s give koekkoek a chance. I’d say he’s earned it in so far as he’s done everything asked of him. The hawks are playing with house money this year considering they didn’t earn this playoff birth. Take a chance with him.

The top 4 D are pretty standard. The top 6 F are the best we got offensively. That first line should never be separated. The second line to me just runs on chemistry. Say what you will about their defensive liability, but there’s just no great alternative that I see with cat and strome. You take cat and strome away from Kane, they just don’t produce the same way. The third line is a bit of a dark horse for depth scoring hopefully. Caggs provides grit and nylander provides a shot for the line. They shouldn’t be a problem defensively either. The fourth line is pretty self explanatory, shut down straight up.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $67 720 019 $0 $7 797 500 $13 779 981 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juill. 2020 à 0 h 22
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
I'm going off of what Scott Powers also said about Dach, he could easily end up being the best or 2nd best in the draft class. Never said Mitchell was going to be better then Boqvist, don't think that's true but he will be damn good 2nd liner.

Lundell is a weaker but very similar player to Dach, Dach is simply better in every department and has much better hands and IQ. Both are big two way defensive minded players but Dach has more offense. Shocked you like Lundell and dislike dach.

Um Toronto has plenty of puck movers and speed on their defense, they just don't have players that play actual defense. 2009/2010 Cup team was not considered fast, it was physical and a possession game, but not one of the fastest teams in the league.


Lundell looks and plays a lot like a Patrice Bergeron. I freakin love Bergeron. Him and Dach share very little in comparison outside of being two way forwards. That’s why I like lundell and not Dach. Lundell is a lot like Bergeron. I love Bergeron. Dach is compared to getzlaf. I DO NOT IN ANY WAY LIKE GETZLAF.

Toronto has Reilly and Barrie as puck movers, maybe dermott. The hawks had Keith, seabrook, oduya, hjalmarsson, leddy, and even rosival on a good night. Not a chance Toronto has the defense to play a possession and speed style. Sandin and maybe liljegren could change that. As for playing actual defense, well, of course they suck at that, lol.

Chicago’s 2010 team, for that time, was very fast. Kinda goes back to what I said earlier about adapting with the speed of the times. Go back to 2010 and find me a team that played faster than Chicago. It isn’t easy.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage