Forums/Armchair-GM

Solidification

Créé par: Blynasty
Date de création initiale: fév 20, 2020
Publié: Feb 20 at 10:09 am
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Transactions
PIT
  1. Granlund, Mikael
NSH
  1. Hållander, Filip
  2. 2020 3e round pick (PIT)
Enfoui
  • Casey DeSmith: 175 000 $ (1 250 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
PIT
PIT
PIT
2021
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
ANA
2022
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 174 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $1 325 875 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
PIT
Zucker, Jason
5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
PIT
Crosby, Sidney
8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
NSH
Granlund, Mikael
5 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
PIT
Kahun, Dominik
925 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Malkin, Evgeni
9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
PIT
Rust, Bryan
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
PIT
Bjugstad, Nick
4 100 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
PIT
McCann, Jared
1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Simon, Dominik
750 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
PIT
Tanev, Brandon
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
PIT
Blueger, Teddy
750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
PIT
Hörnqvist, Patric
5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
PIT
Lafferty, Sam
767 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
PIT
Johnson, Jack
3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
PIT
Letang, Kris
7 250 000 $
DD
NMC NTC
UFA - 3
PIT
Murray, Matt
3 750 000 $
G
RFA - 1
PIT
Pettersson, Marcus
874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
PIT
Schultz, Justin
5 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
PIT
Jarry, Tristan
675 000 $
G
RFA - 1
PIT
Riikola, Juuso
850 000 $
D
RFA - 1
PIT
Ruhwedel, Chad
700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
PIT
Trotman, Zach
700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
PIT
Marino, John
925 000 $
D
RFA - 2
PIT
Guentzel, Jake
6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
PIT
Dumoulin, Brian
4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
PIT
Aston-Reese, Zach
1 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Hörnqvist, P.
Crosby, S.
Zucker, J.
Letang, K.
Malkin, E.
Avantage numérique 2
Rust, B.
McCann, J.
Granlund, M.
Schultz, J.
Pettersson, M.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 fév à 10 h 43
#1
jimmmyg
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 684
Mentions "j'aime": 172
Personally I love it. Zucker and Granlund had their best seasons playing together and the Pens can afford him as a rental. I don't think they would even have to give up a prospect depending on Nashville's position. They are only 2 games out of the WC with quite a few games in hand, so I can see them sticking with Granlund, but boy would it be sweet to have crosby center him and Zucker
20 fév à 10 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2016
Messages: 1,083
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: jimmmyg
Personally I love it. Zucker and Granlund had their best seasons playing together and the Pens can afford him as a rental. I don't think they would even have to give up a prospect depending on Nashville's position. They are only 2 games out of the WC with quite a few games in hand, so I can see them sticking with Granlund, but boy would it be sweet to have crosby center him and Zucker


You have the chemistry of Zucker and Granlund, you have the puck support skill set that Simon brings to the table but then you add in the scoring that Granlund has demonstrated in his career. His hockey IQ is up there as feel. I feel like he would be a tremendous fit. I think the Preds would want to get something a bit more than just a pick out of him since they did ship out Fiala for him, who they had contract control over, but who knows.
20 fév à 10 h 49
#3
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 880
Interesting offer. I'm not especially high on Hallander, but I think he has potential - I'd maybe want a 2nd instead of the 3rd - maybe turns into a conditional 1st if Granlund resigns or NSH also gets another pick next year. However, I don't think the Preds will make a decision on their UFAs until right up to the deadline, so not sure if they even trade Granlund since he is playing very well right now. The Granlund/Zucker connection could be interesting for PIT and that may mean that they would be willing to overpay a bit to get it - who knows.
20 fév à 10 h 55
#4
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2016
Messages: 1,083
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: villenash
Interesting offer. I'm not especially high on Hallander, but I think he has potential - I'd maybe want a 2nd instead of the 3rd - maybe turns into a conditional 1st if Granlund resigns or NSH also gets another pick next year. However, I don't think the Preds will make a decision on their UFAs until right up to the deadline, so not sure if they even trade Granlund since he is playing very well right now. The Granlund/Zucker connection could be interesting for PIT and that may mean that they would be willing to overpay a bit to get it - who knows.


I suppose the pick could be made to a 2nd, conditional 1st if he resigns but the chances of that are fairly slim. He could have to excel, which would likely mean getting paid at his current level or better, which the Penguins wouldn't be able to afford. So it would essentially be a 2nd round pick. Prospect probably gets lower as Hallander is likely the 3rd best regarded offensive prospect in the Penguins system. Granlund fits that age range the Penguins could get the most use out of in the Crosby/Malkin era, but the move-out requirements would be pretty heavy.
villenash a aimé ceci.
20 fév à 11 h 11
#5
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,965
Mentions "j'aime": 880
Quoting: Blynasty
I suppose the pick could be made to a 2nd, conditional 1st if he resigns but the chances of that are fairly slim. He could have to excel, which would likely mean getting paid at his current level or better, which the Penguins wouldn't be able to afford. So it would essentially be a 2nd round pick. Prospect probably gets lower as Hallander is likely the 3rd best regarded offensive prospect in the Penguins system. Granlund fits that age range the Penguins could get the most use out of in the Crosby/Malkin era, but the move-out requirements would be pretty heavy.


Maybe performance-based condition as opposed to a re-signing condition then. But I think that you're right though on your initial thoughts of what Poile would want out of a Granlund trade considering he gave up Fiala to get him. I have the feeling that if he doesn't see something he likes then he will just sit on Granlund and try to sign him in the off-season. That would be a big miss for Poile if he doesn't either re-sign Granlund or get a good return for him in a trade. Luckily Granlund is playing much better since Hynes has been head coach, so maybe that is upping his trade value.
Blynasty a aimé ceci.
20 fév à 12 h 34
#6
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jui 2016
Messages: 1,083
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: villenash
Maybe performance-based condition as opposed to a re-signing condition then. But I think that you're right though on your initial thoughts of what Poile would want out of a Granlund trade considering he gave up Fiala to get him. I have the feeling that if he doesn't see something he likes then he will just sit on Granlund and try to sign him in the off-season. That would be a big miss for Poile if he doesn't either re-sign Granlund or get a good return for him in a trade. Luckily Granlund is playing much better since Hynes has been head coach, so maybe that is upping his trade value.


It's not unheard of to go back to a team who traded you at a deadline, especially in a situation like this. Penguins explain they simply don't have the cap room and Poile leaves the door open on the way out. You're right though, sitting on him to miss the playoffs only to have him test free agency would be a big miss especially if he is peaking towards the end of the year. Plenty of the teams have cap and will be looking for scoring.
villenash a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage