SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Run III

Créé par: canes2006
Équipe: 2019-20 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 17 févr. 2020
Publié: 17 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Heinen, Danton
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
2.
LAK
  1. Senyshyn, Zach
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
2021 3rd round pick AND 2022 4th round pick become a 2nd and 3rd (respectively) if Toffoli resigns or if Bruins make SCF
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Blidh, Anton
  2. Moore, John (1 250 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $84 119 167 $0 $2 490 000 $-2 619 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 févr. 2020 à 12 h 42
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,012
Mentions "j'aime": 7,235
Well, there’s a salary cap.
17 févr. 2020 à 12 h 47
#2
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 5,004
Mentions "j'aime": 2,711
Modifié 17 févr. 2020 à 13 h 12
Prefer Heinen over Kreider rental.
Too many pieces for Toffoli rental.
Moore's not my cup-o-tea but D-man injury depth for playoffs is Job-1. Better to keep him for a Cup run than get futures which could be had at the draft or during 'summer school'.
17 févr. 2020 à 15 h 52
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 326
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: McGruff
Prefer Heinen over Kreider rental.
Too many pieces for Toffoli rental.
Moore's not my cup-o-tea but D-man injury depth for playoffs is Job-1. Better to keep him for a Cup run than get futures which could be had at the draft or during 'summer school'.


Kreider >>>>>>> Heinen

This is the year for the bruins to go all in. This is the moment.
17 févr. 2020 à 15 h 57
#4
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 5,004
Mentions "j'aime": 2,711
Quoting: Rosatoa1367
Kreider >>>>>>> Heinen

This is the year for the bruins to go all in. This is the moment.


For sure it's all-in time agreed, so get Palmeri on line-1 please, that's the need - A 2nd RW SCORER - not rental CK and not for that pkg.
17 févr. 2020 à 17 h 41
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Not bad overall. Trades arent terrible (although I personally think kreider isnt worth it to the bruins who need a RW), but thats my opinion.
You are not right the the Moore deal. Why would they retain any salary at all? They are also giving up Blidh, and while blidh for the 4th is ok, I would rather just give up Moore for the 3rd with no retention, as that is a fair deal.


Quoting: Bcarlo25
Well, there’s a salary cap.

As it has been explained to me: The salary cap only accounts for the amount that is still owed. So if these both happen at the TDL, the cap wont be an issue as they are both only owed like 1.5 million (which means they will be far enough under that cap). ALSO; Kevan Miller should be on LTIR which save another 2.5 million
17 févr. 2020 à 18 h 53
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,012
Mentions "j'aime": 7,235
Quoting: bsilk18
Not bad overall. Trades arent terrible (although I personally think kreider isnt worth it to the bruins who need a RW), but thats my opinion.
You are not right the the Moore deal. Why would they retain any salary at all? They are also giving up Blidh, and while blidh for the 4th is ok, I would rather just give up Moore for the 3rd with no retention, as that is a fair deal.



As it has been explained to me: The salary cap only accounts for the amount that is still owed. So if these both happen at the TDL, the cap wont be an issue as they are both only owed like 1.5 million (which means they will be far enough under that cap). ALSO; Kevan Miller should be on LTIR which save another 2.5 million


The bruins have spent the majority of the season under the cap because of LTIR. You can’t bank LTIR room.
21 févr. 2020 à 20 h 57
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Bcarlo25
The bruins have spent the majority of the season under the cap because of LTIR. You can’t bank LTIR room.


Miller isnt coming off of LTIR, so I can.
22 févr. 2020 à 1 h 8
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 22,012
Mentions "j'aime": 7,235
Quoting: bsilk18
Miller isnt coming off of LTIR, so I can.


Sorry, you may have thought that i meant, “you can’t bank on LTIR room.” That is not what I meant. LTIR room cannot be, “banked.” In other words, it cannot be used as actual cap room. It cannot be saved. And you can’t take 2.5 million dollars thats been on LTIR all year, and replace it with a contract that, prorated, is 2.5 million at the deadline. LTIR simply means that you can replace that exact dollar amount. Let’s take a simple example. Player, “x,” is on LTIR for the entire season at 10 million dollars. At the half way point, a team wants to add two players, who prorated cap hit is 10 million. Can’t do it. In fact, you can’t even replace the 10 million prorated. What you can do, is replace that exact salary. So, 10 million dollar player is gone, and has been for the whole season. At the half way point of the season, you can replace that portion of his salary.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 17 h 11
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Sorry, you may have thought that i meant, “you can’t bank on LTIR room.” That is not what I meant. LTIR room cannot be, “banked.” In other words, it cannot be used as actual cap room. It cannot be saved. And you can’t take 2.5 million dollars thats been on LTIR all year, and replace it with a contract that, prorated, is 2.5 million at the deadline. LTIR simply means that you can replace that exact dollar amount. Let’s take a simple example. Player, “x,” is on LTIR for the entire season at 10 million dollars. At the half way point, a team wants to add two players, who prorated cap hit is 10 million. Can’t do it. In fact, you can’t even replace the 10 million prorated. What you can do, is replace that exact salary. So, 10 million dollar player is gone, and has been for the whole season. At the half way point of the season, you can replace that portion of his salary.


Lol no i get how it works.
Look closer:
You arent seeing the post then, Miller is a scratch IN THIS POST, meaning his 2.5 million is part of that -4.1 million. If you put him back on LTIR (Which is where he is), the cap of this team would actually be -1.6 because, like you said, once he is there, his cap is there, thats the "relief" that it provides. Thats what im saying.
So the cap should be -1.6, and then the fact that TT (even though he has already been traded lol) and CK only have like half of their caps count this season. (if its 1.5 mil each, thats -1.6 + 1.5 + 1.5 = +1.4)
So they are, in fact, not over the cap here.

To make is as clear as i can:

Team (2.5) -- LTIR (0)
Miller --- No miller

what it should be

Team (0) -- LTIR (2.5)
No Miller -- miller
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage