SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Selling

Créé par: Koekkoek_Clock
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 30 janv. 2020
Publié: 30 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $63 471 686 $0 $7 665 000 $18 028 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 55
#1
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 498
Need a little salary retention but CGY might consider that!
30 janv. 2020 à 14 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: InTreWeTrust
Need a little salary retention but CGY might consider that!


Yeah maybe. 1.5M at most
BlastyRocks a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2020 à 19 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
We should be able to get a 1st + prospect from someone so I wouldn't take it unless we got that due to Saad's play for the team.
30 janv. 2020 à 20 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
nah
30 janv. 2020 à 20 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
nah


How
30 janv. 2020 à 20 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
We should be able to get a 1st + prospect from someone so I wouldn't take it unless we got that due to Saad's play for the team.

Depends how good the first is
30 janv. 2020 à 22 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
Depends how good the first is


Likely between 22-31 so I think it depends on the prospect.
Koekkoek_Clock a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2020 à 1 h 18
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
How


Not tryna trade Saad
31 janv. 2020 à 9 h 3
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
Not tryna trade Saad


I don’t think you understand the meaning of “selling”
We have no other ideal assets we’d trade
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
I don’t think you understand the meaning of “selling”
We have no other ideal assets we’d trade


What I'm saying is that we shouldn't be doing a fire sale. Saad isn't a UFA, so there is no impetus to trade him at the moment unless a really good deal presents itself, which this is not. What Bowman should be doing is trading the UFA's (Gus and Crow) and getting back a top 4 defenseman and/or picks/prospects. This team is on the upswing, and I think Saad is more valuable to its future than a late 1st.
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 20
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
What I'm saying is that we shouldn't be doing a fire sale. Saad isn't a UFA, so there is no impetus to trade him at the moment unless a really good deal presents itself, which this is not. What Bowman should be doing is trading the UFA's (Gus and Crow) and getting back a top 4 defenseman and/or picks/prospects. This team is on the upswing, and I think Saad is more valuable to its future than a late 1st.


I guess, but if I’m bowman I keep crow and let him retire
Try to trade maatta (that trade was stupid)
Try to get a defenseman that’s locked up on a good contract for Gus
And call up beaudin next year
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
I guess, but if I’m bowman I keep crow and let him retire
Try to trade maatta (that trade was stupid)
Try to get a defenseman that’s locked up on a good contract for Gus
And call up beaudin next year


Maatta > Beaudin, at least this year and probably next, so I think that, if we do trade him, it should be this summer. It will all depend on the future of De Haan/Seabs.
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
Maatta > Beaudin, at least this year and probably next, so I think that, if we do trade him, it should be this summer. It will all depend on the future of De Haan/Seabs.


Don’t know what drugs you’re on, but I can tell you I’d rather have a rock than Maatta
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 34
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
Don’t know what drugs you’re on, but I can tell you I’d rather have a rock than Maatta


What? Maatta obviously hasn't been our best defenseman, but he has been solid, especially more recently, and he has been playing with a rotating cast of 7th defenseman. He's definitely slow, but he has consistently good positioning, not to mention Stanley Cup experience. Definitely better than Beaudin, who is doing very little in the AHL.
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 36
#15
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
What? Maatta obviously hasn't been our best defenseman, but he has been solid, especially more recently, and he has been playing with a rotating cast of 7th defenseman. He's definitely slow, but he has consistently good positioning, not to mention Stanley Cup experience. Definitely better than Beaudin, who is doing very little in the AHL.


He seems like he lacks.... a LOT
Sometimes it looks like he’s having a brain malfunction on the ice
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 24
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
He seems like he lacks.... a LOT
Sometimes it looks like he’s having a brain malfunction on the ice


He definitely isn't perfect, but he is definitely better than your original assessment.
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 32
#17
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 416
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: Petrock83
He definitely isn't perfect, but he is definitely better than your original assessment.


You’re the only blackhawks fan I’ve heard that likes maatta
31 janv. 2020 à 15 h 59
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
You’re the only blackhawks fan I’ve heard that likes maatta


Don’t like him, don’t hate him. Just think he’s better than any other option we have.
1 févr. 2020 à 17 h 54
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Koekkoek_Clock
You’re the only blackhawks fan I’ve heard that likes maatta


I gotta say I agree with Petrock, he has been particularly good recently on a line with Koekkoek (your namesake).

Not saying he is not tradable at any stretch I just don't think we move him right now, he has a relatively low buyout so risk is negligent and his ability is not all that bad, good stay at home defencemen who can block shots.

I do however understand the scenario of this ACGM as us being sellers so can understand selling him though would only do so before TDL if we get an offer we can't refuse. 3rd or better (i.e. a prospect or part of a package)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage