SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool take 2 EDM CGY VGK TOR BUF PIT DET

Créé par: villenash
Équipe: 2020-21 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2020
Publié: 28 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2800 000 $
22 000 000 $
66 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
1725 000 $
1900 000 $
33 750 000 $
1725 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
EDM
    +grimaldi
    +smith (50% retained)
    2.
    NSH
    1. Bennett, Sam
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
    Détails additionnels:
    +Hamonic
    CGY
    1. Johansen, Ryan (800 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
    3.
    NSH
    1. Tuch, Alex
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
    4.
    NSH
    1. Engvall, Pierre [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    +ceci
    TOR
    1. Saros, Juuse
    2. Watson, Austin
    Détails additionnels:
    +hamonic
    5.
    NSH
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
    3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
    Détails additionnels:
    +bogosian
    BUF
      +granlund (50% retained)
      6.
      NSH
      1. Mantha, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
      DET
      1. Tolvanen, Eeli
      2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
      3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
      4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NSH)
      Détails additionnels:
      enough?
      7.
      NSH
      1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
      2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
      PIT
      1. Bonino, Nick (1 100 000 $ retained)
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de EDM
      2021
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de BUF
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      2022
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de BUF
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2383 500 000 $77 632 810 $0 $850 000 $5 867 190 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 6
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 4
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 1
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      UFA - 1
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      800 000 $800 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      850 000 $850 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      725 000 $725 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      725 000 $725 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      900 000 $900 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      28 janv. 2020 à 11 h 44
      #1
      bigZ
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 688
      Mentions "j'aime": 311
      Selling a little low there on Johanssen are ya?
      28 janv. 2020 à 11 h 46
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 10,323
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,160
      Quoting: bigZ98
      Selling a little low there on Johanssen are ya?


      I look at it as Johansen retained + 5th + Saros + Watson for 1st + 2nd + 4th + 4th + Engvall + Bennett (flipping Hamonic to TOR). I'm ok with that and it allows for more offense in the lineup with the majority of his $8m off the books
      28 janv. 2020 à 11 h 51
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 12,841
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
      Dude Saros is already as good if not slight;y better than Rinne (who's 37) and you trade him?
      28 janv. 2020 à 11 h 54
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 10,323
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,160
      Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
      Dude Saros is already as good if not slight;y better than Rinne (who's 37) and you trade him?


      I don't see him as a guy that will eventually be able to give you 60 games a year with consistency - so I'm ok with trading him to get some good picks, which the preds could definitely use. I think they just need some change and this is that.

      Ingram is playing very well - see how he does as a backup next year and then sign someone like Greiss or Halak (if available) to split time with him for a couple of years til he can be the starter. Just a different look at the goaltending situation.
      28 janv. 2020 à 12 h 30
      #5
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 33,053
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
      Detroit says Hell No Tolvanen hasn't proven a thing. Maybe add Tolvanen+Fabbro together to get the conversation started.
      28 janv. 2020 à 12 h 32
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 10,323
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,160
      Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
      Detroit says Hell No Tolvanen hasn't proven a thing. Maybe add Tolvanen+Fabbro together to get the conversation started.


      Fair enough - could swap him out for another prospect or something, but I would still think a former 1st, a 1st, a 2nd, and a 2nd starts some conversation. Fabbro would be a no-go, but getting 2 1sts and 2 2nds is a pretty good start I would think - no? What would it take other than Fabbro?
      28 janv. 2020 à 12 h 35
      #7
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 33,053
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
      Quoting: villenash
      Fair enough - could swap him out for another prospect or something, but I would still think a former 1st, a 1st, a 2nd, and a 2nd starts some conversation. Fabbro would be a no-go, but getting 2 1sts and 2 2nds is a pretty good start I would think - no? What would it take other than Fabbro?


      Yzerman would be at least wanting Ekholm in the deal. We need D help not more wingers that we already have an over-abundance of.
      28 janv. 2020 à 12 h 37
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 10,323
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,160
      Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
      Yzerman would be at least wanting Ekholm in the deal. We need D help not more wingers that we already have an over-abundance of.


      But would a 29 year old D really be what you're looking for? I actually think Carrier could be a good fit in DET as a PP guy - he's doing really well in the AHL this year and looks like he should be in the show next year. Maybe in another kind of deal, but I have thought he would fit well with DET.
      28 janv. 2020 à 12 h 54
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2020
      Messages: 2
      Mentions "j'aime": 0
      Can you explain your logic on the Buffalo trade?

      Buffalo would not be looking for rentals at the moment. They are well out of the wild card race in a tight Eastern Conference. So it would seem extremely foolish to give up 3 picks for a UFA only to save $2.5M in cap space for the rest of this year. Bogosian is a UFA and his $5M is coming off the books at the end of the year. Now if Granlund had 2 more years of term, this would be a different conversation.
      28 janv. 2020 à 13 h 0
      #10
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 10,323
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,160
      Quoting: TheRival
      Can you explain your logic on the Buffalo trade?

      Buffalo would not be looking for rentals at the moment. They are well out of the wild card race in a tight Eastern Conference. So it would seem extremely foolish to give up 3 picks for a UFA only to save $2.5M in cap space for the rest of this year. Bogosian is a UFA and his $5M is coming off the books at the end of the year. Now if Granlund had 2 more years of term, this would be a different conversation.


      I have seen numerous BUF trades on here where they go after Granlund with a mixture of bogosian/sheary/rodrigues/picks -- It may be a little late in the season now (considering whether or not they want to still push for playoffs). But Granlund with 50% retention could get a 2021 2nd and 2022 7th from a team making a push and then the extra 2020 4th is for taking the full Bogosian contract - gives BUF even more room to add more pieces if they want to (~$5m in cap space after this deal). And the picks are spaced over 3 seasons, so not as bad as if they were all the same year. But as you seem to be implying, maybe this deal is a little too late for BUF and another team could be slotted in their place.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage