SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fix Sharks Take 2

Créé par: DReedy14
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2020
Publié: 27 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
-Trade Dillon for Dzingel at the upcoming trade deadline (fair one for one swap, or should mid-lower picks be added?)
-Sign R. Grimaldi
-Sign P. Francouz
-Buyout Jones
-Trade Melker Karlsson and Gambrell for picks
-Resign Labanc, Dell and Simek
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
    B. Dillion in 2019-20 at deadline
    2.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
    NSH
    1. Gambrell, Dylan
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
    3.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
    PHI
      M. Karlsson at the deadline
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de WSH
      2021
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      2022
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2383 000 000 $74 314 998 $0 $750 000 $8 685 002 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 1
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      950 000 $950 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      950 000 $950 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      27 janv. 2020 à 16 h 11
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2019
      Messages: 391
      Mentions "j'aime": 143
      there's absolutely no chance labanc takes another "prove it" deal after agreeing to a $1m sweetheart in 2019. he's arbitration eligible and he's going to come for that timo meier money.

      in other thoughts--how is this roster any more likely to compete than the roster iced today? it has all the same problems that the sharks have today. weak goaltending, three declining goaltenders eating up $30m of cap space, mediocre depth, no true top-minutes play-driving forwards. These changes are all horizontal.
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      27 janv. 2020 à 17 h 43
      #2
      Once a Kings Fan Too
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 40,620
      Mentions "j'aime": 25,465
      Quoting: grok
      there's absolutely no chance labanc takes another "prove it" deal after agreeing to a $1m sweetheart in 2019. he's arbitration eligible and he's going to come for that timo meier money.

      in other thoughts--how is this roster any more likely to compete than the roster iced today? it has all the same problems that the sharks have today. weak goaltending, three declining goaltenders eating up $30m of cap space, mediocre depth, no true top-minutes play-driving forwards. These changes are all horizontal.


      We know you meant "three declining defenders eating up $26.5m" of cap space, but you're entirely accurate.
      28 janv. 2020 à 16 h 58
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      D. Reedy
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2020
      Messages: 173
      Mentions "j'aime": 39
      Quoting: OldNYIfan
      We know you meant "three declining defenders eating up $26.5m" of cap space, but you're entirely accurate.


      Depends on how you evaluate the current core. I think the team's awful play this year is the result of many factors but the lack of skating/speed is an issue (resulting in more high-danger chances against and taking more penalties), which is why I think the Sharks should go after speedy middle-6 wingers.

      I also don't think the Sharks are as bad as the record shows. I still think a core of Hertl, Couture, Meier and Kane can be a good team, but they need support.

      The Sharks will need youngsters such as Sasha, Gregor, and Blichfield to step up if they are to be competitive.

      While Labanc could probably get closer to Hertl/Meier money, he won't from the Sharks (at least I hope not). He is a defensive liability, takes too many penalties and just doesn't produce enough offense to warrant a $5-6 mil/year contract. Also, I left almost $1.5 in cap space in case he or the FA signings needed more money.

      The aging defensemen is an issue, but I think Burns could bounce back and I actually haven't minded Vlasic's play since he improved after the first few weeks. He's not what he was, but he's not bad. I love Ferraro, he could be the heir to Vlasic.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage